Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Delita

Trump remains silent as evidence of Russia paying Afghan militants to murder US troops arises

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, RaniK_ said:

Must be so convenient that it happened on the same day.  

Lmao conspiracy theories. Also what does it have to do with you guys being wrong in this thread.

 

 

P.S. Russia interference to help Trump was real.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Substatic said:

Lmao conspiracy theories. Also what does it have to do with you guys being wrong in this thread.

 

 

P.S. Russia interference to help Trump was real.

 

 

Not disputing what, $6k in ads helped Trump. But by how much?

 

Clinton's unsuccessful campaign ($768 million in spending) outspent Trump's successful one ($398 million) by nearly 2 to 1. The Democratic National Committee and left-leaning outside groups also outspent their Republican counterparts by considerable margins.

 

Btw. :trump:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, RaniK_ said:

 , $6k in ads helped Trump 

 

 

 :mj2:

 

 

  • Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic.”[1]
  • Major attack avenues included a social media “information warfare” campaign that “favored” candidate Trump[2] and the hacking of Clinton campaign-related databases and release of stolen materials through Russian-created entities and Wikileaks.[3]
  • Russia also targeted databases in many states related to administering elections gaining access to information for millions of registered voters.[4]
  • A notorious Russian "troll factory" had a $1.25 million budget in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election to interfere in the US political system, according to charges filed by the Department of Justice.

 

 

This was fake, just like the Russia bounty story.

Edited by Substatic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, RaniK_ said:

The fucking military.

Post a link.

 

Is the military saying that there was no bounty or are they saying that Trump didn't know about it?

 

Because yesterday the CIA said that they wouldn't tolerate leaks. Implying that the information was indeed leaked.

Edited by Kitad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

 

American officials intercepted electronic data showing large financial transfers from a bank account controlled by Russia’s military intelligence agency to a Taliban-linked account, which was among the evidence that supported their conclusion that Russia covertly offered bounties for killing U.S. and coalition troops in Afghanistan, according to three officials familiar with the intelligence.
Though the United States has accused Russia of providing general support to the Taliban before, analysts concluded from other intelligence that the transfers were most likely part of a bounty program that detainees described during interrogations. Investigators also identified by name numerous Afghans in a network linked to the suspected Russian operation, the officials said — including, two of them added, a man believed to have served as an intermediary for distributing some of the funds and who is now thought to be in Russia.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice how everyone in here as posted sources with news and all the racist hillbilly does is deny without any proof. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Kitad said:

 

The white house is in on it too?

Now he has. Can you imagine the amount of shit the military needs to sift through. Do you really think every amount of hearsay would be briefed? Let alone not even verified. lol.

 

Btw, thanks for confirming the NYT was wrong. gg qq no re

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RaniK_ said:

Now he has. Can you imagine the amount of shit the military needs to sift through. Do you really think every amount of hearsay would be briefed? Let alone not even verified. lol.

 

Btw, thanks for confirming the NYT was wrong. gg qq no re

 

Right. Why would the white house lie about Trump not knowing?

 

Also. We know from Pompeo's letters that high level advisers were in the know of this shit. Therefore, if Trump didn't know he looks incompetent and weak.

 

If Trump knew and still lobbied for Putin to get into the G8, well, then he is a outright treasonous.

 

Pick your poison

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Kitad said:

 

Right. Why would the white house lie about Trump not knowing?

 

Also. We know from Pompeo's letters that high level advisers were in the know of this shit. Therefore, if Trump didn't know he looks incompetent and weak.

 

If Trump knew and still lobbied for Putin to get into the G8, well, then he is a outright treasonous.

 

Pick your poison

Now you are making up bullshit to fulfil your fantasies. Trump would be briefed on verified intelligence only. NYT is still wrong, btw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, RaniK_ said:

Now you are making up bullshit to fulfil your fantasies. Trump would be briefed on verified intelligence only. NYT is still wrong, btw.

So "now" that he has been briefed. What do you think he should do a commander in chief?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you think happened faster? Trump hiding in his bunker and turning off the lights in response to protestors near the WH or tranik running away from this thread?


Imma go with Trump hittin the bunker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Kitad said:

 

So "now" that he has been briefed. What do you think he should do a commander in chief?

Confirm through all avenues to verify the intelligence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Newmanspwn said:

What do you think happened faster? Trump hiding in his bunker and turning off the lights in response to protestors near the WH or tranik running away from this thread?


Imma go with Trump hittin the bunker.

:mj:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×