Why is Twitter trying so hard to prevent Elon Musk from taking it over?

[Goukosan 2,326]

3 hours ago, Twinblade said:

 
Absolutely disgusting. They put popular right wing commentators on black lists so their tweets wouldn’t be exposed to as many users. Anyone who defends this shit is no democracy loving American.

 

1 hour ago, Cooke said:

Twitter saying they don't shadow ban while actively shadow banning. 

 

Twitter followed their TOS.  Spam, hate speech or abusive behavior etc will get less reach on Twitter.

 

 

 

 

Fast Forward to the present, Mr free speech himself... Has implemented a "NEW" policy of reducing reach of hate speech and abusive behavior.   

 

For the slow ones, that's the same thing as what the Twitter files part 2 showed. That Twitter has been doing all along. 

 

 

 

 

Musk - "Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of reach, negative speech will get less reach"   

 

Edited December 9, 2022 by Goukosan

[Cooke 2,043]

Just now, Mr. Impossible said:

Link is dead. 

Lol probably because it was a fucking lie 

[Mr. Impossible 459]

2 minutes ago, Cooke said:

Like Fauci redefining what gain of function and vaccines are, twitter just redefines what shadow banning is. I fucking hate these stupid little games.  

Yes, shadow banning on the internet, the sky is falling and the oceans are evaporating. Lol fucking snowflakes. 

[Cooke 2,043]

Just now, Goukosan said:

 

 

Twitter following their TOS.  Spam, hate speech or abusive behavioretc will get less reach on Twitter.

 

 

 

 

Fasf Forward to the present, Mr free speech himself... Has implemented a "NEW" policy of reducing reach of hate speech and abusive behavior.   

 

For the slow ones, that's the same thing as what the Twitter field part 2 showed. 

 

 

 

 

Musk - "Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of reach, negative speech will get less reach"   

 

This doesn't explain the Stanford epidemiologist. 

[Mr. Impossible 459]

1 minute ago, Cooke said:

Lol probably because it was a fucking lie 

I mean don't they still shadowban? How else would they purge bots, spam, hate speech, CP... Etc? 

[Goukosan 2,326]

1 minute ago, Cooke said:

This doesn't explain the Stanford epidemiologist. 

 

The guy who was critical of the lockdowns that she claimed his impressions were reduced kn 2020?

 

Lock downs were in 2020, the screen shots in Twitter files part 2 showed that his impressions were reduced in late 2021.

 

Funny how she didn't post why it was reduced in 2021 but tried to imply it was reduced in 2020 but didn't realize the screen shot had a date of the modding in late 2021

 

 

Another nothing burger 🍔 

[Cooke 2,043]

54 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

The guy who was critical of the lockdowns that she claimed his impressions were reduced kn 2020?

 

Lock downs were in 2020, the screen shots in Twitter files part 2 showed that his impressions were reduced in late 2021.

 

Funny how she didn't post why it was reduced in 2021 but tried to imply it was reduced in 2020 but didn't realize the screen shot had a date of the modding in late 2021

 

 

Another nothing burger 🍔 

Wow you lie hard dude. 

 

He was against continued school closures that were still going on in 2021. And yes he was part of the Great Barrington Declaration that was also shut down by shady fucking people you pretend to like like Lord Fauci. 

 

Where did he say his impressions were reduced in 2020 gouk? Fucking lying sack of shit every time. The constant gaslighting you do is quite pathetic. You pretend to create a scenario then say "see?! It didn't happen!" No shit fucktard 

Edited December 9, 2022 by Cooke

[Cooke 2,043]

59 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said:

I mean don't they still shadowban? How else would they purge bots, spam, hate speech, CP... Etc? 

By banning. You don't need to shadow ban if what they did was actually against the rules. It's when someone says something you don't like but is not breaking the rules that shadow bans are used. 

[Mr. Impossible 459]

21 minutes ago, Cooke said:

By banning. You don't need to shadow ban if what they did was actually against the rules. It's when someone says something you don't like but is not breaking the rules that shadow bans are used. 

 

Well Cocke, obviously Instagram and Twitter need you to tell them how to run their companies based on all of your experience being the worst admin this site ever had.

[Goukosan 2,326]

1 hour ago, Cooke said:

Wow you lie hard dude. 

 

He was against continued school closures that were still going on in 2021. And yes he was part of the Great Barrington Declaration that was also shut down by shady fucking people you pretend to like like Lord Fauci. 

 

Where did he say his impressions were reduced in 2020 gouk? Fucking lying sack of shit every time. The constant gaslighting you do is quite pathetic. You pretend to create a scenario then say "see?! It didn't happen!" No shit fucktard 

 

I never said he said that.... I said SHE (the person who posted the Twitter files part 2) implied he was shadow banned for his 2020 criticisms of school lockdowns. 

 

Schools were locked down in 2020 doofus.  

 

Schools in America came off lockdown for the 2021 Term. 

 

 

[Goukosan 2,326]

1 hour ago, Cooke said:

By banning. You don't need to shadow ban if what they did was actually against the rules. It's when someone says something you don't like but is not breaking the rules that shadow bans are used. 

 

Musk disagrees with you, he is keeping.. Oops.. I mean implementing a "new" feature to shadow ban users

[Cooke 2,043]

1 hour ago, Mr. Impossible said:

 

Well Cocke, obviously Instagram and Twitter need you to tell them how to run their companies based on all of your experience being the worst admin this site ever had.

lol im the admin that brought this place back from the death. Should i have banned more people? what did i do that was so egregious?  And comparing sw to multibillion dollar corporations with thousands of staff lol

[Mr. Impossible 459]

5 minutes ago, Cooke said:

lol im the admin that brought this place back from the death. Should i have banned more people? what did i do that was so egregious?  And comparing sw to multibillion dollar corporations with thousands of staff lol

 

lol you just suck in general.

[jehurey 3,308]

6 hours ago, Cooke said:

Like Fauci redefining what gain of function and vaccines are, twitter just redefines what shadow banning is. I fucking hate these stupid little games.  

No, nobody redefined what a vaccine is.

 

Sorry, your whataboutisms aren't going to work here.

 

So, you're claim is about something a private company said FOUR YEARS AGO?

 

That isn't something that is a legal obligation of any sort? No it wasn't a contractual agreement of any sort?

 

So.............what exactly is the scandal here?

[jehurey 3,308]

Oh............so they didn't have secret rules because it was all clearly stated in their T.O.S.?

 

So..............there's literally no scandal at all?

[Cooke 2,043]

20 hours ago, jehurey said:

No, nobody redefined what a vaccine is.

 

Sorry, your whataboutisms aren't going to work here.

 

So, you're claim is about something a private company said FOUR YEARS AGO?

 

That isn't something that is a legal obligation of any sort? No it wasn't a contractual agreement of any sort?

 

So.............what exactly is the scandal here?

Lmao vaccine definition was changed in 2021

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html

 

You're so uninformed.

 

 

Also Vijaya Gadde was on Rogan with Jack Dorsey and they were saying the same thing years later. Bold faced lying. 

 

 

[Cooke 2,043]

More

[Mr. Impossible 459]

5 hours ago, Cooke said:

More

Lol propaganda for retards like yourself. 

[Cooke 2,043]

12 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said:

Lol propaganda for retards like yourself. 

uh huh.. 

[Mr. Impossible 459]

58 minutes ago, Cooke said:

uh huh.. 

Please tell us the informative revelations from Trump's last stand - from this very unbiased and fair minded view of how the sleazy Dems oppressed the honest patriotic conservative heroes of Twitter.