JonDnD 2,816 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 6 minutes ago, Twinblade said: Always a good sign when a PC game auto defaults to low settings on your computer Its demanding for sure lol. Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,282 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 Damn, graphics are unreal on series x. Interesting you can go into photo mode on cutscenes too, and freely move the camera. I wonder if the games limitations are due to the graphics or if they could whip out a linear style game with a little open world elements and other physics in it while still maintaining this level of quality. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,816 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 7 minutes ago, Remij said: Game is running incredibly well for me. No Unreal Engine stuttering at all so far in this game It does run good. Only have a few small stutters here and there probably streaming in or auto saving saving. Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,816 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 And just like that, the game that nobody will play is being played by half the forum if not more LOL Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,823 Posted May 21 Author Share Posted May 21 1 minute ago, JonDnD said: It does run good. Only have a few small stutters here and there probably streaming in or auto saving saving. Yeah, I had one stutter when I think it autosaved moving between areas. Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,823 Posted May 21 Author Share Posted May 21 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Tears of the Cows said: Damn, graphics are unreal on series x. Interesting you can go into photo mode on cutscenes too, and freely move the camera. I wonder if the games limitations are due to the graphics or if they could whip out a linear style game with a little open world elements and other physics in it while still maintaining this level of quality. Yea, the photomode in this game is quite possibly one of the best I've ever seen. Cutscenes or whatever, you can freely move the camera around and add lighting and rotate/move the characters. It's crazy in depth. Probably more depth than the actual gameplay Edited May 21 by Remij Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,823 Posted May 21 Author Share Posted May 21 Meta jumped up to 82. Officially better than Stellar Blade 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,816 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 Are you playing this at 4k? Im averaging around 80-90fps but there were a couple times it dipped under 60 at 1440p with DLSSQ. Im using FG tho so its typically locked at 120 but some parts hit. Prob need a 4080 just to stay above 60fps 100 percent of the time. Link to post Share on other sites
Twinblade★ 4,061 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 27 minutes ago, JonDnD said: Its demanding for sure lol. Its actually running surprisingly well for me. 3440 x 1440, DLSS, and everything on high (except shadows on medium because there's rarely a noticeable difference) im getting 35-40FPS on average. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,823 Posted May 21 Author Share Posted May 21 1 minute ago, JonDnD said: Are you playing this at 4k? Im averaging around 80-90fps but there were a couple times it dipped under 60 at 1440p with DLSSQ. Im using FG tho so its typically locked at 120 but some parts hit. Prob need a 4080 just to stay above 60fps 100 percent of the time. I forget what the resolution it was exactly when I first started playing last night, but it was around 4K. Game was running silky smooth I think ~100fps. Today when I got home from work I switched it to 7680x3200 and was getting ~40-45fps. I'll check everything when I play it again later tonight. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,282 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 23 minutes ago, Remij said: Meta jumped up to 82. Officially better than Stellar Blade Update the title Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 464 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 I'm still confused on why they chose to have such a restriction on gaming reviews if the game is at least decent. It's like they wanted the game to fail or something. Even if you don't have confidence it will be commercially successful, you then hope positive word of mouth will help raise awareness. This was a retarded move by MS. If fucking cheech and Chong can afford ad buys I'm sure fucking Xbox can. Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,816 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 I guess i should update my drivers forgot about that. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,816 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 1 minute ago, Mr. Impossible said: I'm still confused on why they chose to have such a restriction on gaming reviews if the game is at least decent. It's like they wanted the game to fail or something. Even if you don't have confidence it will be commercially successful, you then hope positive word of mouth will help raise awareness. This was a retarded move by MS. If fucking cheech and Chong can afford ad buys I'm sure fucking Xbox can. They said they wanted to avoid spoilers. Link to post Share on other sites
Twinblade★ 4,061 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 1 minute ago, JonDnD said: I guess i should update my drivers forgot about that. i actually forgot to do this as well. I played through the first part and the game seems serviceable so far. The constant voices in her head are actually pretty damn annoying. They were a neat gimmick in the original but now they don't add anything to the game and if anything they detract from the immersion and atmosphere. Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,823 Posted May 21 Author Share Posted May 21 2 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said: I'm still confused on why they chose to have such a restriction on gaming reviews if the game is at least decent. It's like they wanted the game to fail or something. Even if you don't have confidence it will be commercially successful, you then hope positive word of mouth will help raise awareness. This was a retarded move by MS. If fucking cheech and Chong can afford ad buys I'm sure fucking Xbox can. I think it really was due to just not wanting to have spoilers out there... because basically the story and environments is all the game has lol. They have a bunch of reviews out there with a bunch of different images, it basically spoils the locations and enemies and such. Like I said before though, it makes no difference. They didn't market this game and no matter what reviews it gets, it's not going to help its sales to any meaningful degree. Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,108 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 2 hours ago, FIREPOWER said: Yeah like this is unique or something you fucking troglodyte Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,816 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 Not surprised to hear you say that. I like it, its a war in her head. The part in the boat was unnerving lol. Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 464 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 2 minutes ago, JonDnD said: They said they wanted to avoid spoilers. That's a stupid reason. Ultimately if it's releasing on gamepass I guess they don't care. People will play it for free and they can just promote it on xbl or something. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now