King B1den should now a$$a$$in8 Truump and drone strike six SCOTUS members?

[Spicalicious 132]

Just now, DynamiteCop said:

 

Executed by who lol? The military would turn on Biden immediately.

nah, they are faithful to the current king. Not some fat orange fake jesus. they should also nuke the bible belt while they're at it.

[Spicalicious 132]

lmfao don't get me started on the religious bible thumper either.. believing shit from a 2000 year old book written by Arabs.. for fuck sake  Jesus was a brown Arab.. not that there's anything wrong with that either but the bible belt white christians and all religions need to be eradicated.

Edited July 1 by Spicalicious

[Chicano3000X 81]

17 minutes ago, DynamiteCop said:

You wouldn't have the chance, your joyous event would be short-lived as every gun toting conservative and libertarian would seize this country in a matter of days.

 

Everyone like you would be executed for treason.

Contrary to popular beliefe, gun ownership is a leftist ideal aswell. Difference is conservatives would fight "big gubment" on behalff of their corperate overlords.

[DynamiteCop 2,143]

2 minutes ago, Chicano3000X said:

Contrary to popular beliefe, gun ownership is a leftist ideal aswell. Difference is conservatives would fight "big gubment" on behalff of their corperate overlords.

Democrats own about half as many guns as Republicans, and what they do own is typically relegated to pistols and shotguns.

[Spicalicious 132]

3 minutes ago, DynamiteCop said:

Democrats own about half as many guns as Republicans, and what they do own is typically relegated to pistols and shotguns.

dont matter King Biden owns all the real guns.. you may as well have pea shooters or pellet guns  

[Spicalicious 132]

King Biden should really toss the whole shit up.  Give the Democrats 10 full years of power to get the country back on track. Executive orders to replace some of the cunt justices like alito and thomas.. put his own.. add a couple more.

 

In 10 years, if the cons find themselves to be moral enough to run the country then they may or may not be given a chance at power.. if they are still pieces of shit like dynocop then sign another executive order to mandate another 10 years of Democrat power.

 

edit: remove that fucking corrupt gorsuch too lmao

 

all these corrupt cons scotus justices should be held in guantanamo due to their lies to congress before being confirmed.

Edited July 2 by Spicalicious

[Mr. Impossible 567]

3 hours ago, DynamiteCop said:

You clearly didn't read the decision and have no fucking clue what you're talking about. You're literally just parroting extreme left nonsense not based in any form of fact or reality. This decision allows absolutely nothing you're talking about.

 

To be fair to him, that was an actual scenario given and Trump's lawyer did say that would be subject to immunity. So he's not being hyperbolic and how many Trump supporters would actually care if Trump killed a democrat? It's a cult. 

 

The decision didn't really specify any out of bounds actions. Simply putting it as official business, Trump trying to interfere with an election would be an official act. 

 

3 hours ago, DynamiteCop said:

That would be a complete violation of the 14th Amendment which would make the act entirely illegal.

 

So what? If he has presidential immunity and can also pardon himself (which they would allow) who is there to hold him accountable? Thats the entire point, pig fucker. 

[Mr. Impossible 567]

3 hours ago, DynamiteCop said:

 

Executed by who lol? The military would turn on Biden immediately.

The military is paid by the government. They are not going rogue. I know the neo nazi wet dream is white posse militias forming pocket governments but the police and military will do as they are told. 

[Substatic 482]

23 hours ago, DynamiteCop said:

Not even remotely how this ruling affects what a President can or cannot do. 

 

King Trump already hedging on you being wrong,

 

Donald Trump Says Fake Electors Scheme Was 'Official Act' - Newsweek

 

Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling (nbcnews.com)

 

Uhh lets hope to god that the courts agree these weren't official acts or we are fucked.

Edited July 2 by Substatic

[DynamiteCop 2,143]

This changes nothing, it's just affirmation of the existing. It's the same reason the President can't be sued for constitutionally backed official acts. This doesn't change any precedent, it merely reenforces it.

Edited July 2 by DynamiteCop

[Substatic 482]

50 minutes ago, DynamiteCop said:

This changes nothing, it's just affirmation of the existing. It's the same reason the President can't be sued for constitutionally backed official acts. This doesn't change any precedent, it merely reenforces it.

 

You should tell that to Trump's lawyers lol. They are literally trying this new ruling on 2 cases today. Specifically citing the new ruling.

Edited July 2 by Substatic

[poopy_butt 29]

On 2024-07-01 at 7:43 PM, DynamiteCop said:

 

Executed by who lol? The military would turn on Biden immediately.

This. Nobody has any respect or faith in this bumbling ol pedophile

[DynamiteCop 2,143]

1 hour ago, Substatic said:

 

You should tell that to Trump's lawyers lol. They are literally trying this new ruling on 2 cases today. Specifically citing the new ruling.

That's the point, it's all dictated by the courts as it has always been.

[Substatic 482]

1 hour ago, poopy_butt said:

This. Nobody has any respect or faith in this bumbling ol pedophile

 

TBH Trump is the only POTUS who was found liable for rape as far as I know. I would imagine they listen to him less if he tries crazy stunts. 

 

36 minutes ago, DynamiteCop said:

That's the point, it's all dictated by the courts as it has always been.

 

So the courts were already going to determine immunity before this case? Proof? I thought the lower courts already determined immunity was off the table until this was kicked up to the SCOTUS. Even though one of the cases was already completed, in which he was found guilty....they are staying the sentencing for that today due to this NEW ruling...

 

So you completely disagree with Trump that this is a huge victory and Jack Smith's cases will be delayed due to this specific and new ruling?

Edited July 3 by Substatic

[DynamiteCop 2,143]

2 hours ago, Substatic said:

 

TBH Trump is the only POTUS who was found liable for rape as far as I know. I would imagine they listen to him less if he tries crazy stunts. 

 

 

So the courts were already going to determine immunity before this case? Proof? I thought the lower courts already determined immunity was off the table until this was kicked up to the SCOTUS. Even though one of the cases was already completed, in which he was found guilty....they are staying the sentencing for that today due to this NEW ruling...

 

So you completely disagree with Trump that this is a huge victory and Jack Smith's cases will be delayed due to this specific and new ruling?

This has been something understood for a very, very long time which is the exact reason he cited immunity in the first place.

 

This isn't new, the court had to reaffirm it.

 

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-5-1/ALDE_00013392/

 

https://constitution.findlaw.com/article2/article-ii--presidential-immunity-to-criminal-and-civil-suits.html

[Mr. Impossible 567]

1 hour ago, DynamiteCop said:

This has been something understood for a very, very long time which is the exact reason he cited immunity in the first place.

 

This isn't new, the court had to reaffirm it.

 

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-5-1/ALDE_00013392/

 

https://constitution.findlaw.com/article2/article-ii--presidential-immunity-to-criminal-and-civil-suits.html

So why exactly did Nixon resign if this do-anything you want rule exist? 

Edited July 3 by Mr. Impossible

[Substatic 482]

9 hours ago, DynamiteCop said:

This has been something understood for a very, very long time which is the exact reason he cited immunity in the first place.

 

This isn't new, the court had to reaffirm it.

 

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-5-1/ALDE_00013392/

 

https://constitution.findlaw.com/article2/article-ii--presidential-immunity-to-criminal-and-civil-suits.html

 

Nope. Literally different language, ruling, and reasoning. This new SCOTUS immunity would've freed Richard Nixon to spy on opponents all he liked, according to legal experts.

 

Quote

 

As president, Richard Nixon used the FBI, the CIA, and White House "advisors" — the now notorious "plumbers" — to spy on and sabotage his political opponents.

Under Monday's Supreme Court decision — which confers the presumption of immunity on a president's "official" actions — Nixon could not have been charged for any of these abuses of power, one constitutional law expert told Business Insider.

"Most, if not all, of that conduct would fall on the 'presumptively-official' side of the line," said Michel Paradis, an attorney who teaches national security and constitutional law at Columbia Law School.

 

 

And, Watergate scandal would have spared Nixon under new ruling, says Dean (thehill.com)

 

The lower courts already completely disagreed with Trump's defense on the above and immunity, so this NEW ruling and reaffirmation literally does have effects. It's not business as usual, things are different now whether you want to call it an affirmation or not. Just look at the NY Case. The trial already went through and this argument failed, yet the sentencing just got delayed yesterday because of this Scotus ruling. People are having a reaction because it has real world impacts...your attempt to downplay it has failed by the words of Trump's own legal team filings, delays, and recent court actions. Trump is absolutely gleeful, don't bullshit us.

 

But more importantly Legal experts who know more than either of us (and not arm chair lawyers) completely disagree with you as well: 

 

Legal experts weigh in on Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity (cbs42.com)

Supreme Court immunity ruling is ‘a big win’ for Donald Trump, expert explains (fox10phoenix.com)

BU LAW Expert Says Supreme Court’s Immunity Decision Is a “Constitutional Embarrassment” | BU Today | Boston University

Donald Unchained: SCOTUS Would Let a President Trump 2.0 Run Rampant: Experts - Business Insider

Historians, legal experts express dismay at Trump immunity ruling - Roll Call

 

Quote

He can dispatch the military to break up protests or deport migrants; he can fire civil servants who disagree with him; he can disband agencies he doesn't like — including the Department of Education or the Environmental Protection Agency — and he can then pardon anyone who gets in trouble for carrying out his orders, Paradis said.

And by calling these acts "official," he can do all of the above without himself being prosecuted, Paradis said.

"Or take the subject matter of Trump's first impeachment," the law professor added. With his new Supreme Court-protected immunity, "He could have much more explicitly directed Rudy Giuliani to convey a threat to the Ukrainians demanding that they come out with dirt on Biden or that he would withhold all aid," he said. "And he can direct subordinates to not simply 'skirt' the law, but affirmatively break it with the promise of a pardon if they do," Paradis added. "And he can do so, knowing that it is extremely unlikely under the court's rule today that he could be successfully prosecuted."

 

To say it "changes nothing" as you did earlier is insanity. These weren't ever going to be things until this NEW ruling,

 

Donald Trump Says Fake Electors Scheme Was 'Official Act' - Newsweek

 

Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling (nbcnews.com)

Edited July 3 by Substatic

[Substatic 482]

Even Pedo-Enable Gym Jordan disagrees with you,

 

Quote

 

House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, reacting to the ruling, said “hyper-partisan prosecutors like Jack Smith cannot weaponize the rule of law to go after the Administration’s chief political rival.”

 

 

When your own god and kings say you're wrong 🤣. But I guess the GOP is gloating over nothing right?

Edited July 3 by Substatic

[poopy_butt 29]

More like King Diden. King Diden office amirite

 

President Diden his last debate. 

[Substatic 482]

Someone should have told the head of the Heritage Foundation that this new ruling changes nothing,

 

Project 2025 creator celebrates SCOTUS immunity ruling (lawandcrime.com)

 

Quote

Appearing on the newly-imprisoned Steve Bannon‘s “War Room” podcast, Kevin Roberts, president of The Heritage Foundation — the group behind the far-right policy agenda known as Project 2025 — heralded the Supreme Court’s recent immunity ruling in favor of Donald Trump as a signal that the U.S. is in the throes of its “second American Revolution.”

 

This is the group responsible for picking the (R) SCOTUS members since the 70s. Far right maniacs have been playing 5D Chess for decades and the results have been monumental. Meanwhile Democrats are stuck playing checkers in quicksand while giving handjobs to shit candidates.

Edited July 4 by Substatic