Jump to content

DynamiteCop

Hermits
  • Content Count

    26,874
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Posts posted by DynamiteCop

  1. 4 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

    It's actually out on Xbox first :bena:

    The game has a chibi art style and the opening is exactly the same as Final Fantasy XV's. Pocket Edition will be split over 10 episodes and has a chance of being ported to the Switch in the place of a Final Fantasy 15 port, which didn't run very well on the Switch because the console couldn't “bring out the most of the engine”.

     

     

    That doesn't mean it wasn't sparked on consoles because of it. Also it being released "soon" may have something to do with Nintendo just getting blasted by a typhoon, or there's issues, or a million other things. 

  2. 1 minute ago, Ike said:

    You say that it doesn’t have support and then laugh when game are being listed? It’s getting fine support from third parties. It’s not suited for the AAA games anyways and third parties know it’s underpowered and just tailor-make games playing to the systems strength. Disgea 1 is absolutely perfect for Switch and so is Diablo 3. 

    Yeah, last generation games and stuff that my SNES could render are suited for the Switch. What a revolutionary device.

     

    Switch already has issues handling Dead Cells for crying out loud...

  3. 8 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

    :snoop: 

     

    You can say Splinter Cell is better than any MGS game you want... I can't tell you no... It's completely understood that is YOUR opinion.  It's a SUBJECTIVE stance...

     

    When I state "ugh, no fucking thanks" as a response... and then say MGS 1,2, and 3 are better... I'm CLEARLY referring to my opinion and not trying to tell you what YOUR opinion is...

     

    You're being so fucking ridiculous :tom:  

    Subjectivity is based upon the credence of the opposing parties stance and them giving way to it. If I truly believe that Splinter Cell is better and I declare that it's better, I am presenting a statement that is objectively rooted unless otherwise stated. I'm not presenting it as an opinion, that is why properly applied context needs to be at the forefront of textually based discussion. Context cannot be derived from it solely without specificity, these are basic English and communication skills. You're implying that I know your context when you applied none.

     

    Are you from Quebec or something?

  4. Just now, Goukosan said:

    Bro... his "no thanks" sets the context for his next statement :cosby2:

     

    If you were talking about a Camaro and I came back with

     

    "Ugh... No fucking thanks

     

    The Mustang is better"

     

    That's not a subjectively structured response. It doesn't matter what you mean, all that matters is how you say it and the way it's structured. 

  5. Just now, Goukosan said:

    His "no thanks" obviously means he is talking about his own preference and not trying to dictate yours. 

     

    11 minutes ago, Legal US Citizen said:

    No, you leveraged two different things in your post. I don't care what you think you meant, it's how you structured your post.

     

    You saying "Ugh...  no fucking thanks" is subjective. However following that up with "MGS 1,2, and 3 are much better" turns the latter into an objectively made followup which is argumentative. 

     

    This is why text in any form needs contextual application, a simple "For me" or "I think" takes your objectively presented post and makes it subjective. You can call me a dumbass until the cows come home and I couldn't care less, structure your posts better. 

     

  6. 2 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

    No... it's implied that I'm speaking my opinion for myself because it's inherently a subjective subject... You're just retarded man.  LMAO

    Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory is better than any Metal Gear Solid.

     

    That's not a subjective sentence.

     

    I think Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory is better than any Metal Gear Solid.

     

    That is a subjective sentence.

     

    A statement is not inherently subjective.

  7. Just now, Remij_ said:

    I'm not arguing the fact that YOU'd rather play Splinter Cell dumbass... I'm responding that I wouldn't.  Jesus christ... :| 

     

    You told me I was trying to tell you what you'd rather or rather not play by that post... lmao.. that's a fucking misunderstanding.

    No, you leveraged two different things in your post. I don't care what you think you meant, it's how you structured your post.

     

    You saying "Ugh...  no fucking thanks" is subjective. However following that up with "MGS 1,2, and 3 are much better" turns the latter into an objectively made followup which is argumentative. 

     

    This is why text in any form needs contextual application, a simple "For me" or "I think" takes your objectively presented post and makes it subjective. You can call me a dumbass until the cows come home and I couldn't care less, structure your posts better. 

  8. 1 minute ago, Remij_ said:

    I never implied you were... :| 

     

    You said you would... and I said I wouldn't...  How do you misunderstand that?

    You presented your post as objective, I didn't misunderstand anything. 

     

    5 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

    Ugh... no fucking thanks :D 

     

    MGS 1,2, and 3 are much better :glad: 

     

  9. 2 minutes ago, TLHBO said:

    You just don't get it do you :mj:

    Apparently you don't. Repeating "it's over your head" or "you just don't get it" multiple times why failing to extrapolate how I supposedly am when repeatedly asked doesn't vindicate what you're saying. It's an easy way of talking shit to someone without actually holding a position.

     

    It's like saying "you're wrong" without explaining how, it's what dumb people do. 

×
×
  • Create New...