Mr. House 3,371 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Mortal Kombat: Shaolin Monks is the best MK game and the only one that doesn't completely suck. Obviously, it's not a fighting game, it just bear the name/setting of MK. :-* Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hot Sauce 2,730 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Mortal Kombat has never had an AAA game yet it outscored Street Fighter? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gamegenie 7 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Bu but teh flash movie...scorpion should have won I bet all the MK fankids got really angry about that. Too bad they can't make an counter video that is even close to the quality of MK vs SF, because they are all unskilled hicks that jerk off to pixelated blood in a shitty fighting game.Bu but teh street fighter fans should have let Scorpion win what is that crap doing in this DOA thread anyway...Gamegenie lmfao :D that crap outscored SF, /thread He's basing this all on some casuals review. :D:D:D:D:D:D:D Everyone with a little fighting game knowledge knows street fighter is the far superior fighter. Oh so GS score doesn't matter anymore, you sheep are pathetic Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sixbeat 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 MK is just a gimmick. Without that shitty blood effect, that game is nothing but a heaping steaming pile of pieces of shit. Not to mention its gimmicky replacement of "C" with "K". :cillzone: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kaptain0wnage 17 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 How times have changed. Back when MK was 2D and going head to head, everyone loved MK more and the SF fans were like a nerdy little minority. Too bad the shitty new MKs killed any nostalgia for the 2D classics while SF actually improved (SF3). Shitty flamebait from another random flopmerican. Flamebait where I told the truth about how SF improved and MK went to shit. Yeah, that makes sense. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilentSoldier 2 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Mortal Kombat died after Mortal Kombat 2, end of discussion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Eva 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 How times have changed. Back when MK was 2D and going head to head, everyone loved MK more and the SF fans were like a nerdy little minority. Too bad the shitty new MKs killed any nostalgia for the 2D classics while SF actually improved (SF3). Shitty flamebait from another random flopmerican.Actually, it's the DOA4 expert Oh ya, hahaha! He was the one that challenged me to a doa fight. :D:D:D:D Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gamegenie 7 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 MK is just a gimmick. Without that shitty blood effect, that game is nothing but a heaping steaming pile of pieces of shit. Not to mention its gimmicky replacement of "C" with "K". :cillzone: you say what ever you want about it, but it doesn't change the fact that. MK did better than SF in terms of sales, popularity, review scoring and longevity. MK > SF /thread or must you continue to damage control. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Eva 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Bu but teh flash movie...scorpion should have won I bet all the MK fankids got really angry about that. Too bad they can't make an counter video that is even close to the quality of MK vs SF, because they are all unskilled hicks that jerk off to pixelated blood in a shitty fighting game.Bu but teh street fighter fans should have let Scorpion win what is that crap doing in this DOA thread anyway...Gamegenie lmfao :D that crap outscored SF, /thread He's basing this all on some casuals review. :D:D:D:D:D:D:D Everyone with a little fighting game knowledge knows street fighter is the far superior fighter. Oh so GS score doesn't matter anymore, you sheep are pathetic They are fine for casuals that like games like MK. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bhytre 2,753 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 How times have changed. Back when MK was 2D and going head to head, everyone loved MK more and the SF fans were like a nerdy little minority. Too bad the shitty new MKs killed any nostalgia for the 2D classics while SF actually improved (SF3). Shitty flamebait from another random flopmerican.Actually, it's the DOA4 expert Oh ya, hahaha! He was the one that challenged me to a doa fight. :D:D:D:DBeware of the balerina kicks and PPPK combos at expert level Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sixbeat 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 MK is just a gimmick. Without that shitty blood effect, that game is nothing but a heaping steaming pile of pieces of shit. Not to mention its gimmicky replacement of "C" with "K". :cillzone: you say what ever you want about it, but it doesn't change the fact that. MK did better than SF in terms of sales, popularity, scoring and longevity. MK > SF /thread or must you continue to damage control. Well who gives a shit? This thread is about Tekken, DoA and dogs. If you want MK discussions, go make a thread about it, cunt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Eva 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 How times have changed. Back when MK was 2D and going head to head, everyone loved MK more and the SF fans were like a nerdy little minority. Too bad the shitty new MKs killed any nostalgia for the 2D classics while SF actually improved (SF3). Shitty flamebait from another random flopmerican. Flamebait where I told the truth about how SF improved and MK went to shit. Yeah, that makes sense. The truth is that MK never owned. It was the same shit then as it is now, but the only difference is that the blood thing was new then and all you nerds were humping it's dick for just that. It's ok though, casuals tend to like MK and DoA better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Eva 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Mortal Kombat died after Mortal Kombat 2, end of discussion.Yes, because the blood novelty wore off. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GrimmCalypso 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 95 pages of a bullshit argument involving Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bhytre 2,753 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 MK is just a gimmick. Without that shitty blood effect, that game is nothing but a heaping steaming pile of pieces of shit. Not to mention its gimmicky replacement of "C" with "K". :cillzone: you say what ever you want about it, but it doesn't change the fact that. MK did better than SF in terms of sales, popularity, review scoring and longevity. MK > SF /thread or must you continue to damage control. That's why they still play MK even in competitions today...oh wait...that's Street Fighter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gamegenie 7 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 MK is just a gimmick. Without that shitty blood effect, that game is nothing but a heaping steaming pile of pieces of shit. Not to mention its gimmicky replacement of "C" with "K". :cillzone: you say what ever you want about it, but it doesn't change the fact that. MK did better than SF in terms of sales, popularity, scoring and longevity. MK > SF /thread or must you continue to damage control. Well who gives a shit? This thread is about Tekken, DoA and dogs. If you want MK discussions, go make a thread about it, cunt. Eva & Bhyrte, they won't accept their rapage and so this discussion will continue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Eva 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 MK is just a gimmick. Without that shitty blood effect, that game is nothing but a heaping steaming pile of pieces of shit. Not to mention its gimmicky replacement of "C" with "K". :cillzone: you say what ever you want about it, but it doesn't change the fact that. MK did better than SF in terms of sales, popularity, review scoring and longevity. MK > SF /thread or must you continue to damage control. This is a thread about fighting games, so lets talk about them. What fighter is better as a fighting game? MK or SF? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
darkjacob. 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 This thread is proof, lemshits dont know shit about games. Didn't you used to be a cow? Yes, a really big one before the PS3. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Eva 0 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 How times have changed. Back when MK was 2D and going head to head, everyone loved MK more and the SF fans were like a nerdy little minority. Too bad the shitty new MKs killed any nostalgia for the 2D classics while SF actually improved (SF3). Shitty flamebait from another random flopmerican.Actually, it's the DOA4 expert Oh ya, hahaha! He was the one that challenged me to a doa fight. :D:D:D:DBeware of the balerina kicks and PPPK combos at expert level He just recently learned to mix up his high and low attacks and now he feels like some doa god. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
radicaldude 1 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 gamegenie doesn't know when to quit Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.