Remij 4,676 Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, DynamiteCop! said: Is that a fact? Disable the RT and run the benchmark again and let's see how much the ratio diverges. LOL ok. Go Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 16 minutes ago, Remij_ said: LOL ok. Go Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,676 Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 My CPU is still holding me back at 1080p resolution Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, Remij_ said: My CPU is still holding me back at 1080p resolution Go to 1440, we'll run both Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 Frames: 10174 Time: 177766ms Avg: 57.233 Min: 28 Max: 232 Frames: 19456 Time: 177219ms Avg: 109.785 Min: 70 Max: 290 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,676 Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) How are you getting the frame data? Edited October 15, 2019 by Remij_ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Remij_ said: How are you getting the frame data? Fraps, so at 1440p it seems like I gained on you a bit on the RT side but it's still basically 1/3, and the regular raster one is still around a little less than 1/2. So pretty much in this scenario your RT acceleration is helping you about 30%. Edited October 15, 2019 by DynamiteCop! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,676 Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, DynamiteCop! said: Fraps, so at 1440p it seems like I gained on you a bit on the RT side but it's still basically 1/3, and the regular raster one is still around 1/2. Yea. Pretty consistent. Still a very limited demo though. It's neat... but nothing on the level that it could be with real GPU hardware acceleration. They'll need DXR for that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,623 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 Does it say great results regardless ? Lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,078 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 @The Mother Fucker Your turn. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, lynux3 said: @The Mother Fucker Your turn. Spin up that 1080 Ti at 1440p, let's see where a non-RTX high end card lands. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,676 Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, DynamiteCop! said: Spin up that 1080 Ti at 1440p, let's see where a non-RTX high end card lands. It's gonna land high... because he has a CPU with 2x the cores that I do... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, Remij_ said: It's gonna land high... because he has a CPU with 2x the cores that I do... How much does that matter at 1440p? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,676 Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, DynamiteCop! said: How much does that matter at 1440p? It matters because the Ray tracing in this is using the extra cores of the CPU. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Remij_ said: It matters because the Ray tracing in this is using the extra cores of the CPU. Fuck it, test everything. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,676 Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: Fuck it, test everything. lol no matter the resolution, or even RT on or off... his PC should do favorable compared to mine.. The game is designed to scale with cores... and because the bench uses the extra cores/threads for RT as well. So not only will his GPU not be bottlenecked, he'll have cores to spare to throw at the RT. He'll still be GPU limited though. Edited October 15, 2019 by Remij_ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 1 minute ago, Remij_ said: lol no matter the resolution, or even RT on or off... his PC should do favorable compared to mine.. The game is designed to scale with cores... and because the bench uses the extra cores/threads for RT as well. So not only will his GPU not be bottlenecked, he'll have cores to spare to throw at the RT. He'll still be GPU limited though. Are you nervous lol? You kind of sound like it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,676 Posted October 16, 2019 Author Share Posted October 16, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: Are you nervous lol? You kind of sound like it. no Why would I be? I'm just explaining that the benchmark is using extra CPU cores for RT... so he SHOULD perform well, given his hardware. It's probably why I'm 3x faster than you with RT and only 2x without. My CPU has more threads than yours. Edited October 16, 2019 by Remij_ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Just now, Remij_ said: no Why would I be? I'm just explaining that the benchmark is using extra CPU cores for RT... so he SHOULD perform well, given his hardware. It's probably why I'm 3x faster than you with RT and only 2x without. My CPU has more threads than yours. Oh you're on a 6 core? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,676 Posted October 16, 2019 Author Share Posted October 16, 2019 Just now, DynamiteCop! said: Oh you're on a 6 core? 4 core 8 thread. Aren't you 4 core 4 thread? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.