Playstation Tablet 1,847 Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 Next Gen Console PC Concept Build CPU - Ryzen 7 3700X at 3.2GHz (Underclocked) Motherboard - Asus ROG Strix B450F GPU - RX 5700 XT Storage - NVME SSD Cinebench R15 Athlon 5370 at 1.6GHz (Jaguar CPU Core x 4) 1T (Single thread) - 35 MT (Multi thread) - 128 8 core (Projected, 100% scaling assumption) - 256 Athlon 5370 at 2.3GHz (Jaguar CPU Core x 4) 1T (Single thread) - 49 MT (Multi thread) - 183 8 core (Projected, 100% scaling assumption - 366 Richard makes a comparison with Intel's 2008 Quad-core CPU, the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600. Intel Q6600 Stock (2.4GHz Quad Core) MT (Multi-thread) - 245 Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 5,000 Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 The new CPUs are going to allow for so much more it's not even funny So yea, the most important takeaway here is that raw TF numbers aren't and never have been a good way to compare capabilities between GPUs. Especially when they are different architectures... Games can be bottlenecked in so many different ways. The number is essentially meaningless. Like as if Nvidia hasn't proven that time and time again. Richard seems intent on making that clear, so it's likely that the TF number would seem disappointing on it's own. That's why I think this talk that PS5 is more powerful than Scarlett comes down to the tools at this point. It seems doubtful that there will be any meaningful difference between them. It's likely they'll both be the same basic setup, GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD... with only minor custom changes/additions/functions/frequency to the hardware. Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,433 Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, Remij_ said: The new CPUs are going to allow for so much more it's not even funny So yea, the most important takeaway here is that raw TF numbers aren't and never have been a good way to compare capabilities between GPUs. Especially when they are different architectures... Games can be bottlenecked in so many different ways. The number is essentially meaningless. Like as if Nvidia hasn't proven that time and time again. Richard seems intent on making that clear, so it's likely that the TF number would seem disappointing on it's own. That's why I think this talk that PS5 is more powerful than Scarlett comes down to the tools at this point. It seems doubtful that there will be any meaningful difference between them. It's likely they'll both be the same basic setup, GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD... with only minor custom changes/additions/functions/frequency to the hardware. RTX flopped. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 5,000 Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 5700/xt is gonna be low end by late next year Link to post Share on other sites
Playstation Tablet 1,847 Posted October 21, 2019 Author Share Posted October 21, 2019 40 @ 1.8GHz = 9.2TF 44 @ 1.8GHz = 10.1TF 40 @ 2.0GHz = 10.2TF 44 @ 2.0GHz = 11.2TF Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 5,000 Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, Team 2019 said: 40 @ 1.8GHz = 9.2TF 44 @ 1.8GHz = 10.1TF 40 @ 2.0GHz = 10.2TF 44 @ 2.0GHz = 11.2TF It's NOT going to be no fucking 2GHz.. jesus christ people Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,433 Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 7 minutes ago, Remij_ said: It's NOT going to be no fucking 2GHz.. jesus christ people Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 5,000 Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 Just now, lynux3 said: Use your god damned head Link to post Share on other sites
-GD-X★ 8,280 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 I look forward to not having a CPU bottleneck. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now