Biden tells the liberals what everyone else has for months - “Looting is not a protest, it is a crime; draws away attention from real tragedies”

[Tears of the Cows 1,236]

5 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, there are not "plenty" saying that.

There are plenty. You can see videos of them... looting.  Thousands. 

[jehurey 3,299]

Just now, ghostz life matters said:

There are plenty. You can see videos of them... looting.  Thousands. 

no there isn't.

 

and you're clearly trying to hint at racial overtones, again

 

@-GD-X notice how he's claiming stuff and isn't providing proof. Its obvious what he's trying to stoke.

[Tears of the Cows 1,236]

Just now, jehurey said:

no there isn't.

 

and you're clearly trying to hint at racial overtones, again

 

@-GD-X notice how he's claiming stuff and isn't providing proof. Its obvious what he's trying to stoke.

Here’s a whole book defending it. the author is white. 
 

https://www.amazon.com/Defense-Looting-Riotous-History-Uncivil/dp/1645036693
 

[jehurey 3,299]

1 minute ago, ghostz life matters said:

Here’s a whole book defending it. the author is white. 
 

https://www.amazon.com/Defense-Looting-Riotous-History-Uncivil/dp/1645036693
 

Nope. Your post was clearly insinuating that there were 2020 Black Lives Matter protestors were saying that they approve of rioters committing violence.

 

I asked you for proof of that happening..........and you responded with a book from somebody who was not part of that.

 

Looks like you don't have proof of what you just claimed.

 

You're thread is looking more and more discrediting.

[Tears of the Cows 1,236]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Nope. Your post was clearly insinuating that there were 2020 Black Lives Matter protestors were saying that they approve of rioters committing violence.

 

I asked you for proof of that happening..........and you responded with a book from somebody who was not part of that.

 

Looks like you don't have proof of what you just claimed.

 

You're thread is looking more and more discrediting.

That book was released... this year. 
 

here, another article by time, this year saying the looters of today are no different than the Boston tea party looters, justifying it along the way. 
 

https://time.com/5851111/protests-looting/
 

I’m actually starting to wonder why you won’t condemn it, seems a bit odd. So I until you do, safe to say you’re for looting too. 

Edited October 29, 2020 by ghostz life matters

[jehurey 3,299]

2 minutes ago, ghostz life matters said:

That book was released... this year. 
 

here, another article by time, this year saying the looters of today are no different than the Boston tea party looters, justifying it along the way. 
 

https://time.com/5851111/protests-looting/
 

I’m actually starting to wonder why you won’t condemn it, seems a bit odd. So I until you do, safe to say you’re for looting too. 

Nope............you said ACTUAL PROTESTORS  were saying that they are for rioting and violence.

 

and you have yet to provide any evidence.

 

@-GD-X Notice how he is now trying to turn the argument directly towards me, and make it a personal remark. He's trolling (not to mention stalling since he can't back up the very specific claims he just made).

[-GD-X★ 7,822]

locked because i hate getting tagged.