Jump to content

Open Club  ·  22 members  ·  Rules

All Things Politics

Parler shared Capitol Riot posts with Law Enforcement and then has to explain to its users the meaning of Free Speech.


Recommended Posts

Imagine this clowns ran from FB, IG and Twitter because conservatives were being "silenced" and free speech was under attack.   Only for them to go to Parler let their guard down and post how they really feel only to get arrested by the feds  :luff:

 

 

 

 

https://mashable.com/article/parler-first-amendment-fbi-users-outraged.amp?__twitter_impression=true

 

"Some users have raised questions about the practice of referring violent or inciting content to law enforcement," begins Parler's latest statement. "The First Amendment does not protect violence inciting speech, nor the planning of violent acts. Such content violates Parler's TOS. Any violent content shared with law enforcement was posted publicly and brought to our attention primarily via user reporting. And, as it is posted publicly, it can properly be referred to law enforcement by anyone. "

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's hilarious is the reaction from people who realized that Parler referred content about committing violent and/or criminal acts to the governments.

 

They're basically saying this:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...