Jump to content

Mr. House

Lemming
  • Content Count

    31,680
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    119

Posts posted by Mr. House

  1. 2 hours ago, madmaltese said:

    Please do tell us all what we are getting from Bend, Bluepoint, Housemarque, Team Asobi, Team Santa Monica, Media Molecule and London Studio since you seem to know everything. 

     

     

    Sony Bend - Wipeout VR (exclusive to PSVR2)

    Team Asobi - Astro Bot 2 (exclusive to PSVR2)

    Media Molecule - Some crappy ass game maker thing

    London Studio - Blood and Truth 2 (exclusive to PSVR2) 

    Bluepoint - Ico HD remaster with optional VR mode

    Santa Monica studio - New Twisted Metal with optional VR mode

     

     

    B) 

    • Haha 2
  2. 29 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

     

    The question was literally about his alleged concern for Ukraine/tanks over his concern for the US cities. 

     

    Pence addressed the two part question in two parts. 

     

    That tanks in Ukraine aren't his concern and then he expressed his concern for the US cities. 

     

    I'm not even a fan of Pence. His and Tucker's assessment of the state of the US are both way off. 

     

    But Im not letting my dislike of both get in the way of what was actually said. 

     

    The clip was purposely cut short to dupe folks and here you come being duped :kaz:

     

     

     

    I had seen the full interview pretty much the day it happened. I'm watching the video Mike Pence posted and I still get away with the same thing.

     

    I think I understand where you're coming from a bit more but as I've said, he should have phrased it in a different way or being more specific if he didn't want to be misinterpreted.

     

    It's hardly fake news because if you put the questions and the following answer it's sound really bad, even within context. It's not until he clarify his stance later on that it makes sense. And I have to say it was still really weak, formulaic responses. 

     

    Anyway, whatever. 

  3. 3 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

     

    You cannot be this dense :will: 

     

    Pence addressed the "tank concern" and then he literally agreed with Tuckers' assessment of the cities..

     

    "that not my concern, I've heard that

    routine from you before"  (This about the tanks) 

     

    "I'm running for President of the United States" (he goes on to agree that cities are failing and says his focus will be to improve that) 

     

    He then circles back to Ukraine and says America is so great we can do both, support Ukraine and improve our cities. 

     

     

    Mr. Short YouTube clips lmfao. 

    No matter how much you like to point out what he says after he fucked up is pretty irrelevant. The damage is already done.

     

    The question had nothing to do with tanks specifically, it was about supporting US cities first instead of supporting Ukraine.

     

    Call it a Freudian slip or whatever. If you can't admit his answer sounded really bad before he went in with most obvious, generic answers then I don't know to tell you. Keep defending some pos Republican who fucked up on stage if you want. It's not my concern, Goukosan. 

     

  4. 3 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

     

    My god you are stupid :kaz:

     

    "That's not my concern" was a response to Tucker saying his concern was about the tanks. 

     

    The rest of Pence's response answers the 2nd part of the question of Tucker's framing of the cities... In which Pence addresses that as well.

     

    The YouTube clip you posted cuts off his full answer to Tucker's multi level loaded question. 

     

     

    See this what happens when you dumb ass relies on short YouTube clips for news.. Fucking idiot :will:

    I literally quoted three following sentences from Pence video.

     

    I watched both videos twice. The answer came right after Tucker talked about US cities. I know he did answer after about that in more specific but as I've said, it was already passed the point of no return. 

  5. 30 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

     

    Mr. YouTube Easily duped Ramza strikes again :kaz:

     

     

     

    Here’s the full clip. 

     

     

    Tucker said" your concerned about tanks in Ukraine, that they don't have enough tanks" ... Pence responded that's not my concern

     

     

     

    See this is what happens when you get your news from YouTube clips you easily duped simpleton :umad:

     

    Literally the same clip that I posted with 30 seconds of Pence's answer cut short. Should have thought twice before phrasing it this way.

     

    ''Where's the concern for the United States?'' After blatantly telling him US cities are going to shit.

     

    ''That's not my concern, Tucker.'' 

     

    ''I hear this routine from you before Tucker and it's just not my concern.''

     

    Anything he says after that is already passed the point of no return. 

     

     

  6. 2 hours ago, Goukosan said:

     

    You were talking about America's support of Ukraine not Canada's..... Saying we as if you're American...delusional fuck :kaz:

     

    Again where are you getting that information from that the Russian GDP increased? The Kremlin and Random YouTube vids are credible sources. 

     

    The inflation rate in the west in DECREASING month by month while Russia's increase.  The top supporter of the Ukraine war (America) has the lowest inflation rate of the entire G7 :umad:

     

     

    Can you read? I said attempted coup... The Russian Army is literally infighting... Putin top Merc came out and said Russia is on the brink... Putin just allegedly killed his top Merc..... All of well.. No panic in the Russian ranks.. Nothing to see here. 

    We = the west. 

     

    To deny that these sanctions aren't hurting the west is well is just fucking ridiculous. Worst economy of my life time as far as I'm concerned. 

     

    Is there any moment in history when there wasn't infighting in Russia? Also Wagner PMC is not the regular Russian army, even if it's an extended branch in some ways. It is no way indicative of infighting in the army or bad morale or anything that indicates the Russian forces are about to self implode. 

     

     

  7. 2 hours ago, Mr. Impossible said:

     

    So without a NATO alliance, what exactly keeps Russia in line with any agreement they sign today? 

    You guys seem to think that only way to make an agreement is for a country to be part of NATO in case they are invaded. 

     

    This is above my knowledge of diplomacy and geopolitics, I can't in all good faith propose a sound plan that would work. Like I said, I'm not a diplomat. 

  8. 23 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

     

    What's with you and cooke with this "we" thing when you're talking about America?  You're not American you delusional fuck :kaz:

     

    Who told you the Russian GDP increased the Kremlin?  Lol

     

    Russian oil exports went from 33% of Europe down to 6%.... I know these pesky facts have a way shitting on your narrative :umad:

     

     

    Yevgeny saw the writing on the wall, why do you think he attempted the coup?  He couldn't stand to see his mother Russia being depleted for a useless war. 

     

    "You better kill me, but I won't lie.  I have to be honest, Russia is on the brink of disaster" 

     

     

     

    Canada is in this as well, you idiot. Anything the US does reflects on Canada in some shape or form.

     

    The GDP of Russia increased. This is an economic fact and no that didn't come from the Kremlin. Their economic situation is complex and challenging but hardly a disaster. I love how you brush off the fact the west is also experiencing high inflation and economic setbacks. 

     

    Going by Prigozhin butthurt, dude is mad at Shoigu for not properly supporting them in their assault of Bahkmut. 

     

    Oh yeah, the coup that never happened. Great indication of Russia's demise.  :D 

  9. Just now, Twinblade said:

     
    Can you at least elaborate on what kind of conditions Russia will agree to that will prevent them from invading Ukraine again? 
     

    or did you suddenly forget about the Budapest Memorandum, in which Russia agreed to give security assurances to Ukraine, just to stab them in the back and break the agreement just like they’ve done many others? 
     

    The ONLY agreement that could guarantee Ukraine’s security would be them joining NATO, but there is no chance of Russia letting that happen under the current conditions. 

    Do I look like a diplomat?

     

    I agree Russia will never accept to let Ukraine join NATO. That would be their first demand most likely to ensure it never happens. 

  10. 1 minute ago, Tears of the Cows said:


    The last two Mario games have been more different than the latest GOW and the first GOW. :D 

     

     

    It's clear you never played GoW before the reboot, or the reboot.

     

    Just another clueless Sheep who spew random nonsense about games he never played. Shocker. 

  11. 29 minutes ago, Tears of the Cows said:

    Lots on the way!

     

    Spider-Man 73

    wolverine (Spiderman clone)

    the last of us 3

    the last of us multiplayer

    god of war 692

     

    Mario 692

    Kirby 29

    Pikmin no one gives a fuck 4

    Mario Kart 16

    Mario Tennis 21

    Super Smash Bros with Mario!

    More Kirby ports! 

     

    :lul: 

  12. 9 minutes ago, Twinblade said:

     
    So if there was an immediate ceasefire and Russia held onto the land they currently have, what solution would you propose to ensure they couldn’t invade again to cause more war crimes and take more land? 

    It's usually called diplomacy. Ceasefire agreements, peace deals with conditions. 

     

    58 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

     

    Ukraine is a sovereign nation, it's their choice to defend themselves or surrender.  They chose to defend themselves. 

     

    What about Russia? They're loosing 10s of thousands of men, economy is crashing, inflation is through the roof, their oil export to Europe is dried up etc.   How come you're not suggesting that they retreat? :umad:

     

     

    If Ukraine wants to die miserably and have no future, that's their choice indeed but we don't have to enable them to do so. 

     

    Russia has more men, their GDP just increased, their oil productions are down and they have enough allies to keep selling their oil. Oil price increases also benefits Russia.

     

    You know who needs that oil the most? NATO nations actively fighting against their biggest energy provider through a proxy. Lmao. 

     

    Suggesting them to retreat? That's not in the realm of possibility. Just a delusional talking point.

     

    You haven't answered my question. Do you think Ukraine can win this conflict? Yes or no? This is vital because if you don't actively believe they can, then you're no better than a neo con warmonger. And if you think they can, it means you are delusional. 

     

     

  13. On 2023-08-27 at 12:20 AM, Goukosan said:

     

     

    What your retarded ass doesn't understand that is Ukraine surrendering 1/3 of its sovereign nation is not a negotiable end to the conflict. 

    Ukrainians dying in the tens of thousands and potentially losing even more territory is a better solution?

     

    Oh yea, that's right, you don't care as long as American blood is not being spilled. Great success! 

     

    Tell me, do you really think they stand a chance in defeating Russia in a complete military victory? This is a yes or no answer. 

     

     

  14. 9 hours ago, Goukosan said:

     

    What exactly is happening? 

     

    It's an energy efficient appliance rule applied to ceiling fans dipshit.... That's not a ban you easily duped idiot :kaz:

     

     

    Your TV, fridge, microwave, washer and dryer and other house hold appliances all are under energy efficient standards.... And are energy efficient appliances and have been for decades ...I guess you are outaged about that too lmfao :umad:

     

     

     

    The point I made was in 2020 when the bill passed the far right didn't make a fake outage about it because energy efficient rules being applied to house hold appliances are the norm and the administration was republican. 

     

    Now in 2023 because a democrat administration is applying that same rule.... They're creating a fake outage to rile up the easily duped.... And here you go being easily duped. 

     

    Over an ENERGY EFFICIENT RULE for house appliances. 

     

    How fucking stupid are you, really? 

     

     

    This is like when the right tried this same shit with gaming consoles "OMG they're coming for your Xbox... Its energy efficient now" :adhd:

     

    :will:

     

     

    P.S.

     

    I just bought an energy efficient deep freezer for my basement about 2 months ago... Basically saw no difference in my light bill :juggle:

     

     

    But anyways that neither here or there... I still can't believe you're getting riled up about energy efficient appliances... Lmfao. 

     

    I never said it was a ban. :kaz:  Good luck banning air fans with the summer heat with have now. 

     

    Inefficient rules that is going to bankrupt small companies and make zero change to energy consumption in the US. Amazing. 

     

    At least tackle heavy energy consumptions from air conditioning or something before bothering with stupid shit.  

×
×
  • Create New...