JonDnD 2,644 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Lmao at all the work youre doing. Seems you get triggered when someone calls you out for writing love letters to dyno Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,243 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 We can tell who actually sounds butthurt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,644 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 ^^ sure can coming to rescue your other account? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,243 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 jonb is now making conspiracy theories? I understand, that way you get to say the number of times you got raped shrinks by half. lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,644 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Now other men are talking about raping other men . Something smells fishy here Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,258 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 On 2019-09-16 at 11:56 AM, Team 2019 said: Absolutely brutal. Getting back on topic.... Slow Jonny is trying to derail the thread because MS got obliterated in the video Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,644 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 I thought the video was hilarious. Not as hilarious as you clinging to dynos sack tho Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,258 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 22 hours ago, Goukosan said: Bbbut clickbait Basically, Jim has 5 main points (Chapters) to why he feels it's Microsoft's fault for games being bad in the industry due to MTXs. - Chapter 1 & 2: Think of this as the prologue and Microsoft setting the normalization of MTXs. Last generation started with MTXs with EA and Microsoft saw the opportunity for the future that games would have them, so they made their first party games towards them for XB1 launch. This in effect symbolizes their lack of good games because they needed those MTXs to sustain them instead of creating good, enticing games that Sony/Nintendo make without MTXs. Launch titles he touched on was Ryse, Forza 5, and Lococycle. - Chapter 3: Excuse for using MTXs. Basically quotes from executives of those launch games about MTXs being optional until it turns to "timesavers" to change wording. This makes third party publishers extremely happy. - Chapter 4: Microtransactionsoft. Basically, talks about MS' big AAA games having MTXs for no reason at all (Halo 5, Gears of War 4, Forza 7, etc.). Sony/Nintendo wasn't using them and MS just wanted to be greedy. Criticized Gears 5 for having MTX while stating "we have no loot boxes" and calling out the stroking of themselves by thinking they are the first to implement "no lootboxes" in games and moving the industry forward. - Chapter 5: Final Chapter. Brings up some praise for accessibility for all users due to hardware/accessories and Gamepass and opening up to other platforms. However, talks about how MS is the company that got into games other than the fact that they didn't like Sony's marketshare in the industry. This is also the company that brought us paying for online gaming with consoles and played a big part of normalizing MTXs in games, makes the most powerful console in the world, but has no launch games designed specifically to take advantage of it. Final point is that it was using its original DRM plans to help normalize MTXs in games from 2013 to present and to make the future worse for gamers. Summary of the Brutality Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,243 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 You know its bad when a lardass loser like Jim Sterling is laughing down at the Xbox. That video was only regarding ONE subject, can you imagine if he focused on the other MS failures? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,644 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Lmao , goobs is quoting himself. Escoose me , attentionzzz please !! Or did you get your accounts mixed up Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,258 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 On 2019-09-16 at 11:44 AM, Quad Damage said: It behooves first party publishers to provide top quality productions that make their consoles worth buying. Nintendo and Sony have both produced amazing games to sell us on the PS4 and Switch. Microsoft, however, is different. Microsoft has decided to act no better than a grasping third party "AAA" publisher. Even worse, it set the tone of a generation and contributed - perhaps more than any other company - to the nasty normalization of excessive monetization. It's Microsoft's fault that videogames are bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,644 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 What point are you trying to make here ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spicalicious 128 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) This guy is full of shit. Sure he talks nice about Zelda, God of War and spiderman but hates on Gears for having micro transactions in MULTI PLAYER modes of Gears. Read carefully: Zelda and God of War are primarily single player games. Adding micro transactions to single player games defeats the purpose of the actual game. That being said, since Zelda and God of War are inherently single player games, there are no openings for micro transactions otherwise Sony and Nintendo may partake if they had the opportunity. What hot online multiplayer games do Sony and Nintendo actually have? I mean for real, what popular multiplayer games do either of those companies own? They have pretty much none. Games like Gears and Halo are shooters and any other shooters from any third party will have those types of transactions.. It kind of adds to the multiplayer fun aspect for some people. Who gives a shit about that? His argument is invalid. If ya'll don't like shooters then eat poop. Edited September 17, 2019 by Spicalicious Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,243 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 11 minutes ago, Spicalicious said: This guy is full of shit. Sure he talks nice about Zelda, God of War and spiderman but hates on Gears for having micro transactions in MULTI PLAYER modes of Gears. Read carefully: Zelda and God of War are primarily single player games. Adding micro transactions to single player games defeats the purpose of the actual game. That being said, since Zelda and God of War are inherently single player games, there are no openings for micro transactions otherwise Sony and Nintendo may partake if they had the opportunity. What hot online multiplayer games do Sony and Nintendo actually have? I mean for real, what popular multiplayer games do either of those companies own? They have pretty much none. Games like Gears and Halo are shooters and any other shooters from any third party will have those types of transactions.. It kind of adds to the multiplayer fun aspect for some people. Who gives a shit about that? His argument is invalid. If ya'll don't like shooters then eat poop. Unlike Zelda and God of War.................Gears need multiplayer to extend the value of the game, because its a shitty ass 10 hour single player. And MS charges microtransactions for the very thing you need to even get any value out of the game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spicalicious 128 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, jehurey said: Unlike Zelda and God of War.................Gears need multiplayer to extend the value of the game, because its a shitty ass 10 hour single player. And MS charges microtransactions for the very thing you need to even get any value out of the game. What is this extra value you get in the game in the form of flags or skins for use in multiplayer? If you mean it adds extra fun to multiplayer and the community of gamers then it's fine. you might not like that type of game but many people do just for reasons like skins and flags. It's just another aspect of a fun shooter multi player style game. Not my fault sony and ninty got no shooters in their arsenal of games. Edited September 17, 2019 by Spicalicious Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,243 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 1 minute ago, Spicalicious said: What is this extra value you get in the game in the form of flags or skins for use in multiplayer? If you mean it adds extra fun to multiplayer and the community of gamers then it's fine. you might not like that type of game but many people do just for reasons like skins and flags. It's just another aspect of a fun shooter multi player style game. Not my fault sony and ninty got no shooter games in their arsenal of games. Neither does Microsoft..........Gears multiplayer is tired and nonexistant. First-party games are meant to show off AAA-quality...........SINGLE player content. Ninty and Sony have it. MS......? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spicalicious 128 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 13 minutes ago, jehurey said: Neither does Microsoft..........Gears multiplayer is tired and nonexistant. First-party games are meant to show off AAA-quality...........SINGLE player content. Ninty and Sony have it. MS......? nah you're wrong Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,243 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 1 minute ago, Spicalicious said: nah you're wrong Let me know when there's a good AAA quality long single player game from Microsoft. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.