Social media is destroying children's lives

[Cooke 2,027]

 

[Mr. Impossible 408]

15 hours ago, Cooke said:

 

 

Yes, we know. You hate trans and queer people. You remind us of this almost daily. 

[Cooke 2,027]

8 hours ago, Mr. Impossible said:

 

Yes, we know. You hate trans and queer people. You remind us of this almost daily. 

Yeah cause it's just totally cool to have more people chopping off body parts cause it's the "in thing" these days. 

[Mr. Impossible 408]

27 minutes ago, Cooke said:

Yeah cause it's just totally cool to have more people chopping off body parts cause it's the "in thing" these days. 

In brief, Shrier’s book is a fear-filled screed, full of misinformation, biological and medical inaccuracies, logical fallacies, and propaganda. In it, she argues that young cisgender women are “seduced” into believing that they’re transgender by a predatory Internet and social environment.

 

The book is hardly a pillar of scientific inquiry, either. Rather, it is written in a journalistic style, as might be expected given that Shrier is a journalist with a Bachelor of Philosophy degree and a J.D. and does not claim any particular scientific or medical training. Where citations are provided for claims – a rare phenomenon in this book! – they usually reference newspaper articles, social media posts (usually Reddit or YouTube), or personal interviews or conversations. The book is published by Regnery publishing, a conservative and Christian publishing center which has previously published books from such bias-free authors as Dennis Prager and Ann Coulter

 

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/abigail-shriers-irreversible-damage-a-wealth-of-irreversible-misinformation/

__

Yeah, she sounds super credible. Lmfao @ "a wealth of misinformation."

 

Lol When your source uses Reddit. 

 

 

[Cooke 2,027]

7 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said:

In brief, Shrier’s book is a fear-filled screed, full of misinformation, biological and medical inaccuracies, logical fallacies, and propaganda. In it, she argues that young cisgender women are “seduced” into believing that they’re transgender by a predatory Internet and social environment.

 

The book is hardly a pillar of scientific inquiry, either. Rather, it is written in a journalistic style, as might be expected given that Shrier is a journalist with a Bachelor of Philosophy degree and a J.D. and does not claim any particular scientific or medical training. Where citations are provided for claims – a rare phenomenon in this book! – they usually reference newspaper articles, social media posts (usually Reddit or YouTube), or personal interviews or conversations. The book is published by Regnery publishing, a conservative and Christian publishing center which has previously published books from such bias-free authors as Dennis Prager and Ann Coulter

 

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/abigail-shriers-irreversible-damage-a-wealth-of-irreversible-misinformation/

__

Yeah, she sounds super credible. Lmfao @ "a wealth of misinformation."

 

Lol When your source uses Reddit. 

 

 

No Remy, this is not normal. 

 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202330

 

 

[Mr. Impossible 408]

12 minutes ago, Cooke said:

No Remy, this is not normal. 

 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202330

 

 

 

What does Bill Maher quoting one person have to do with you posting some video about a misinformed source? 

[Mr. House 3,371]

TikTok is probably the worst thing to happen to generation z. Mental illnesses are basically celebrated on TikTok, it goes beyond gender dysphoria, it's everything. You see all those troubled self diagnosed teenagers seeking attention through their mental illnesses. It's just sad. 

[Cooke 2,027]

1 hour ago, Ramza said:

TikTok is probably the worst thing to happen to generation z. Mental illnesses are basically celebrated on TikTok, it goes beyond gender dysphoria, it's everything. You see all those troubled self diagnosed teenagers seeking attention through their mental illnesses. It's just sad. 

No no. It's not celebration.  It's called "raising awareness". Every single issue and grievance GenZ has must have awareness campaigns to promote it in hopes of gaining millions of new mentally vulnerable followers. 

Edited September 15, 2022 by Cooke

[Mr. House 3,371]

4 minutes ago, Cooke said:

No no. It's not celebration.  It's called "raising awareness". Every single issue and grievance GenZ has must have awareness campaigns to promote it in hopes of gaining millions of new mentally vulnerable followers. 

Can't wait to have instruction on how to use the 'proper' pronouns at my job. 

[Mr. Impossible 408]

1 hour ago, Ramza said:

Can't wait to have instruction on how to use the 'proper' pronouns at my job. 

It's pretty simple, you call the person their preferred pronoun. It's actually not super hard. 

[Mr. House 3,371]

7 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said:

It's pretty simple, you call the person their preferred pronoun. It's actually not super hard. 

[Cooke 2,027]

 

And the pro obesity agenda 

[Mr. Impossible 408]

2 minutes ago, Cooke said:

 

And the pro obesity agenda 

Hey, what did Bill Maher have to do with you posting a video by a right wing hack? You never answered.

[Mr. Impossible 408]

4 minutes ago, Ramza said:

 

As someone who knows quite a few "theys" and is lazy, it's not as dramatic as bigots make it out to be. In fact youll realize you probably wont be addressing someone by their pronouns anyway and most people aren't offended by it as an accident. Most times its only an issue when someone is purposely using pronouns for a reaction. 

[Cooke 2,027]

3 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said:

Hey, what did Bill Maher have to do with you posting a video by a right wing hack? You never answered.

What right wing hack?

[Mr. Impossible 408]

3 minutes ago, Cooke said:

What right wing hack?

 

Who we were talking about in this very thread you fucking chud. To be fair, I did call her out of her name by calling her a right wing hack. Just because she contributes to and is mostly signal boosted by the right doesn't mean she creates content geared towards the right. She's more of an anti-trans hack.

[Cooke 2,027]

17 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said:

 

Who we were talking about in this very thread you fucking chud. To be fair, I did call her out of her name by calling her a right wing hack. Just because she contributes to and is mostly signal boosted by the right doesn't mean she creates content geared towards the right. She's more of an anti-trans hack.

Anti trans. More like Pro reasonable and thoughtful discussion about an agenda with far too much power over our words and action that harms children before they have the mental capacity to make such life altering and possibly life destroying decisions. But you don't give a shit. It's die be the sword for the trans agenda no matter how far it goes. 

Edited September 15, 2022 by Cooke

[Mr. Impossible 408]

1 hour ago, Cooke said:

Anti trans. More like Pro reasonable and thoughtful discussion about an agenda with far too much power over our words and action that harms children before they have the mental capacity to make such life altering and possibly life destroying decisions. But you don't give a shit. It's die be the sword for the trans agenda no matter how far it goes. 

 

Lol how far does it go? Two idiots going on about some nefarious agenda they can't describe. 

[Mr. Impossible 408]

Lol "die by the sword"

You motherfuckers are so fucking dramatic and dumb. Worse is, you actually don't give a fuck and projecting. Using kids as your cover for your bigotry. 

[Cooke 2,027]

1 hour ago, Mr. Impossible said:

Lol "die by the sword"

You motherfuckers are so fucking dramatic and dumb. Worse is, you actually don't give a fuck and projecting. Using kids as your cover for your bigotry. 

I hope your kid is trans and wants to chop off their genitals and you are suuuuuuper supportive of their wishes instead of actually getting them some therapy for their body dysmorphia.