Jump to content

Why is everyone freaking out over seeing more footage from Jan6th?


Recommended Posts

And why were the defendants not allowed access to it? Isn't that against constitutional rights? 

Edited by Cooke
Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it defeats their narrative, and their brain rejects it and they become angry. Brainwashing is a hell of a thing to recover from.

 

I remember the very people here posting some of these bullshit stories, which have now been PROVEN to be lies.

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, TLHBO said:

Because it defeats their narrative, and their brain rejects it and they become angry. Brainwashing is a hell of a thing to recover from.

 

I remember the very people here posting some of these bullshit stories, which have now been PROVEN to be lies.

 

Specifically what bullshit has been proven to be lies? 

 

Are you referring to the stolen election lies (which you believed) by Fox, which they admitted in court that it was a all lies? 

 

Or when multiple Fox Hosts got caught admitting via text that it was all lies and fake stories they were feeding to their audience?   Are you referring to that? 

 

 

I hope you don't get angry and your brain doesn't reject the facts that have come out about the proven lies from Fox News :umad:

Edited by Goukosan
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Cooke said:

And why were the defendants not allowed access to it? Isn't that against constitutional rights? 

 

Did you actually read the story? 

 

"U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg said he understood why Sara Carpenter — who is facing two felony charges for her actions at the Capitol — would like time to review the material. But he said she had failed to explain why any additional footage of her movements inside the building would be exculpatory, particularly when prosecutors had already turned over footage of the vast majority of Carpenter’s 34 minutes inside the building."

 

" At Friday’s hearing, prosecutors opposed Carpenter’s request, saying they had pieced together the “overwhelming” amount of her movements using CCTV footage, leaving only “a matter of seconds” unaccounted for. Carpenter already has access to a “massive” trove of CCTV footage, they noted, and defendants have the ability to request specific camera angles they would like to focus on if they believe they need additional material."

 

" several defendants have said they intend to access the materials, which House Republicans have agreed to facilitate. "

 

 

To summarize the one case that got rejected for the additional footage failed to prove in court that the extra few seconds would help her case.... Seeing as basically the entire 34 mins of her in the capitol ON TAPE was already presented in court. 

 

For others cases where the defendants actually have a case for the footage, they will get to access it. 

 

 

 

But realistically, all that will do is delay their cases a bit.  If you're already caught on tape breaking the law additional footage of you breaking the law won't help your case.... Lol

 

Edited by Goukosan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is freaking out? Why can you guys only counter the strawmen you create?

 

I assume that you are possibly talking about people stating that giving all of the information to a biased source is sus. It's hard to tell because you are so dumb and dishonest all of the time. 

 

Just like the Twitter files, it's one thing to release all information to all people, it's another to release it all to a person set to create a narrative. 

 

You do know the Tucker Carlson is a liar right? You might have heard of him calling for one of his coworkers to be fired for telling the truth? Or admitted multiple times that he makes stuff up in order to keep looking right,or downplayed Kanye's antisemitism so he could use his conservative switch for clout? Or that he doesn't believe any of the Trump shit he's been defending for years. 

 

So yeah, maybe some people are like don't give it all the most corrupt news agency, and the most dishonest man in news. It's fucking shocking right? 

Edited by Mr. Impossible
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, TLHBO said:

Because it defeats their narrative, and their brain rejects it and they become angry. Brainwashing is a hell of a thing to recover from.

 

I remember the very people here posting some of these bullshit stories, which have now been PROVEN to be lies.

And what was proven to be a lie? At this point its so easy to tell that you guys don't actually listen for facts or details or anything like that. You just listen for buzzwords and soundbites to quote. Y'all never actually can prove anything you said to be reality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Goukosan said:

 

Specifically what bullshit has been proven to be lies? 

 

Are you referring to the stolen election lies (which you believed) by Fox, which they admitted in court that it was a all lies? 

 

Or when multiple Fox Hosts got caught admitting via text that it was all lies and fake stories they were feeding to their audience?   Are you referring to that? 

 

 

I hope you don't get angry and your brain doesn't reject the facts that have come out about the proven lies from Fox News :umad:

probably that cop that was supposedly murdered when they entered the building but is shown walking around inside giving people a tour much later.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mr. Impossible said:

Who is freaking out? Why can you guys only counter the strawmen you create?

 

I assume that you are possibly talking about people stating that giving all of the information to a biased source is sus. It's hard to tell because you are so dumb and dishonest all of the time. 

 

Just like the Twitter files, it's one thing to release all information to all people, it's another to release it all to a person set to create a narrative. 

 

You do know the Tucker Carlson is a liar right? You might have heard of him calling for one of his coworkers to be fired for telling the truth? Or admitted multiple times that he makes stuff up in order to keep looking right,or downplayed Kanye's antisemitism so he could use his conservative switch for clout? Or that he doesn't believe any of the Trump shit he's been defending for years. 

 

So yeah, maybe some people are like don't give it all the most corrupt news agency, and the most dishonest man in news. It's fucking shocking right? 

serious? Did you not see Schumer? Did you not see MSNBC? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Cooke said:

probably that cop that was supposedly murdered when they entered the building but is shown walking around inside giving people a tour much later.. 

 

The cop that died, didn't die in the building.. He died the next day as a result of what he endured the day prior... Aka succumbed to his injuries. 

 

And post the video of him giving a "tour" much later

Edited by Goukosan
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

The cop that died, didn't die in the building.. He died the next day as a result of what he endured the day prior... Aka succumbed to his injuries. 

 

And post the video of him giving a "tour" much later

What injury did he sustain? Who murdered him?

Edited by Cooke
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cooke said:

serious? Did you not see Schumer? Did you not see MSNBC? 

No I didn't motherfucker. Again, I explained the perfectly logical stance that it's very unlikely that Tucker Carlson or Fox will report on the footage honestly. Funny how you don't have an issue with that. You never seem to find anything nefarious on the right despite being a moderate centrist. 

 

Funny how that works out... Every. Single. Time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...