jehurey 3,230 Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 Just now, JONBpc said: Its ranked higher . And has a higher score than botw . Get over it. You dont even own a switch . Cucktendo idiot LOL No it doesn't have a higher score. its got a 97 metacritic score. Just like BoTW and SMO, except those two games have more reviews while still maintaining such a high score. So it should go: SMO - 97 BoTW - 97 RDR4 (PS4) - 97 RDR2 (XBO) - 97 Hot dog!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted August 23, 2019 Author Share Posted August 23, 2019 21 minutes ago, JONBpc said: Its ranked higher . And has a higher score than botw . Get over it. You dont even own a switch . Cucktendo idiot LOL 17 minutes ago, jehurey said: No it doesn't have a higher score. its got a 97 metacritic score. Just like BoTW and SMO, except those two games have more reviews while still maintaining such a high score. So it should go: SMO - 97 BoTW - 97 RDR4 (PS4) - 97 RDR2 (XBO) - 97 Hot dog!!!!!!!!!!!! Slow Jonny caught lying again Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted August 23, 2019 Author Share Posted August 23, 2019 31 minutes ago, bhytre said: Could be worse, like becoming a handheld gamer could be worse... could be a dead console like Xbox1 Switch gets YET ANOTHER BANGER NEXT WEEK Jeeez Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,622 Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 It's funny how you guys try to discredit metacritic now . MetaCritic doesnt have tie for X place . Rdr beats Mario and zelda . Get over it . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 41 minutes ago, JONBpc said: It's funny how you guys try to discredit metacritic now . MetaCritic doesnt have tie for X place . Rdr beats Mario and zelda . Get over it . How did we discredit metacritic? If you notice on their "All Time" best games list......it doesn't have numerical rankings on the left side. They're not ranking the games. Therefore, its only common sense that a game that has maintained a 97 metacritic score across 113 reviews is more impressive than a game that has a 97 metacritic score that only had 33 reviews. Don't get mad because we're using COMMON SENSE that you can't argue against. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,622 Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 Hmm Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, JONBpc said: Hmm Instead of viewing it on your phone, you should visit the real, full website, as it was meant to be displayed. No ranking numbers, whatsoever. Thanks for playing. Edited August 23, 2019 by jehurey Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,622 Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 You lost , you're wrong , get over it . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 58 minutes ago, JONBpc said: You lost , you're wrong , get over it . Nope, metacritic has no rankings when the metacritic score is exactly the same. and, by common sense.......a game that has more reviews while having the same metacritic score is logically the more criticially acclaimed game. that's not really up for debate. thanks for playing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,622 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 Nope . They are clearly numbered. And even without numbers, in order. In order, in ranking, rdr wins . You . Lost . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 Just now, JONBpc said: Nope . They are clearly numbered. And even without numbers, in order. In order, in ranking, rdr wins . You . Lost . nope they aren't. visit the actual website, like i did. BOTW and SMO are more critically acclaimed, and thus logically better than RDR2. Deal with it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,622 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 Doesnt matter anyway. Rdr being rated higher means nothing . Switch misses 90 percent of AAA 3rd party. You can pretend to be goober and play zelda for 10 months , but you didn't play it at all . You play budget PC games , and dont even own a ditch LOL Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Teh_Diplomat 2,054 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, JONBpc said: Doesnt matter anyway. Argues for 5 pages, and 40% of their overall post count with Jehurey; then forfeits and goes back to the original point. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,622 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 9 minutes ago, Teh_Diplomat said: Argues for 5 pages, and 40% of their overall post count with Jehurey; then forfeits and goes back to the original point. Jerry argues that switch is a better standalone console while talking about pc games not even tou would play Stfu Laundromat Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 20 minutes ago, JONBpc said: Doesnt matter anyway. Rdr being rated higher means nothing . Switch misses 90 percent of AAA 3rd party. You can pretend to be goober and play zelda for 10 months , but you didn't play it at all . You play budget PC games , and dont even own a ditch LOL well, for starters, rdr2 isn't rated higher and, like i said before, rdr2 failed to win many gotys, where SMO and BoTW won many. So we already have two switch games that , at minimum, meet the very best game on XBO. and probably exceed it. so from there on out, top 10 xbox one games, any combination of microsoft-developed or multiplat........simply aren't as good as top 10 switch games. this is based on your original conditions: judging each platform in vacuum as the only platform you would own. Switch beats XBO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 9 minutes ago, JONBpc said: Jerry argues that switch is a better standalone console while talking about pc games not even tou would play Stfu Laundromat actually i said that you play those multiplats on PC, while trying to advocate for xbox against the switch. really undermines your credibility there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,622 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 (edited) I play xbox more than pc . You play pc more than switch , cause you dont own one . Rdr is rated higher . Switch misses 90 percent of AAA 3rd party . You'd play xbox more than switch , if you owned either of them . You dont , so you play 10 dollar games on PC and whatever free games ps4 gives you. On your 970 lol junk Oh, you don't play ps4 either . Probably your nephews as well LOL Edited August 24, 2019 by JONBpc Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 1 minute ago, JONBpc said: I play xbox more than pc . You play pc more than switch , cause you dont own one . Rdr is rated higher . Switch misses 90 percent of AAA 3rd party . You'd play xbox more than switch , if you owned either of them . You dont , so you play 10 games on PC and whatever free games ps4 gives you. Oh, you don't play par either . Probably your nephews as well LOL sorry, its not rated higher. top 10 switch games beat top 10 xbox one games, even if they mostly consist of multiplat. SMO and BoTW have more reviews, and are therefore more critically acclaimed..........that's simply not up for discussion, that a numerical fact. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 20 hours ago, Goukosan said: Two bitter battered lemmings speaking on an Xcluded game Don't worry. I get the detail you're describing. They prolly look very similar. Interesting it runs fine on switch, being a ps4 game. My brother will probably cop this, as I bought the import version like a hella jap Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.