The laptop that doesn't exist has evidence Hunter Biden was involved with the Ukrainian Bio Labs that don't exist

[jehurey 3,236]

Yup, I remembered that Twitter specifically said that they would be cracking down on intentionally misleading and misinformation tweets on public figures in the finaly weeks leading up to the election.

 

here is their official blog post in which they announce that.........ONE WEEK prior to your article:

 

_____________

 

Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

By

Vijaya Gadde

and

Kayvon Beykpour

Friday, 9 October 2020

This blog has been updated November 2, 2020, to reflect updated information on labeling election results.

Twitter plays a critical role around the globe by empowering democratic conversation, driving civic participation, facilitating meaningful political debate, and enabling people to hold those in power accountable. But we know that this cannot be achieved unless the integrity of this critical dialogue on Twitter is protected from attempts — both foreign and domestic — to undermine it.

 

Today, we're announcing additional, significant product and enforcement updates that will increase context and encourage more thoughtful consideration before Tweets are amplified.

 

How our Civic Integrity Policy applies on and around Election night

 

We do not allow anyone to use Twitter to manipulate or interfere in elections or other civic processes, and recently expanded our civic integrity policy to address how we’ll handle misleading information surrounding these events. Under this policy, we will label Tweets that falsely claim a win for any candidate and will remove Tweets that encourage violence or call for people to interfere with election results or the smooth operation of polling places. More specifically:

• People on Twitter, including candidates for office, may not claim an election win before it is authoritatively called. To determine the results of an election in the US, we require either an announcement from state election officials, or a public projection from at least two authoritative, national news outlets that make independent election calls. Tweets which include premature claims will be labeled and direct people to our official US election page.
• Tweets meant to incite interference with the election process or with the implementation of election results, such as through violent action, will be subject to removal. This covers all Congressional races and the Presidential Election.

New prompts and more warnings on misleading Tweets

We currently may label Tweets that violate our policies against misleading information about civic integrity, COVID-19, and synthetic and manipulated media. Starting next week, when people attempt to Retweet one of these Tweets with a misleading information label, they will see a prompt pointing them to credible information about the topic before they are able to amplify it.

 

Tweets with labels are already de-amplified through our own recommendation systems and these new prompts will give individuals more context on labeled Tweets so they can make more informed decisions on whether or not they want to amplify them to their followers.

 

In addition to these prompts, we will now add additional warnings and restrictions on Tweets with a misleading information label from US political figures (including candidates and campaign accounts), US-based accounts with more than 100,000 followers, or that obtain significant engagement. People must tap through a warning to see these Tweets, and then will only be able to Quote Tweet; likes, Retweets and replies will be turned off, and these Tweets won’t be algorithmically recommended by Twitter. We expect this will further reduce the visibility of misleading information, and will encourage people to reconsider if they want to amplify these Tweets.

[Mr. Impossible 409]

4 hours ago, Cooke said:

Did the media cover that up? Was talk about it not even allowed in direct messages on Twitter? Did Facebook ban people for discussing it? 

 

There you go being dishonest again. Like how many times are you going to be a skank on this subject? You've given like 3 different intentions in the last page. 

 

All of that actually doesn't matter because in over two years of hard hitting internet investigations you have never mentioned anything that isn't trying to take what you feel is leftist to task. 

 

You're so fair minded and not right wing yet nothing that the right has done seems to bother you. You legit are going on and giving multiple different reasons why you care about the hunter laptop even contradicting yourself along the way. 

 

[Goukosan 2,256]

13 hours ago, Mr. Impossible said:

Cooke JUST called him "the son of the most powerful man on the planet" when all of this supposedly happened between Biden’s terms. Cucke is just trying to tread water at this point. 

 

Meanwhile Ivanka was just racking up Chinese patents, millions upon millions in cash WHILE SHE WAS A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE and WHILE TRUMP was president. 

 

And then her husband, Trump's son in law got BILLIONS from the Saudis. 

 

@Cooke did not say a peep for four years about that.. On one word.

 

 

Fair and Balanced he says

[jehurey 3,236]

Then-White House senior adviser Jared Kushner stood among Saudi officials in the Oval Office at the White House on  March 20, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

'He's Cashing In': Kushner Firm Gets $2 Billion From Saudi Fund Run by Crown Prince

Watchdogs noted that the investment came after Kushner "used his position in the White House to advance Saudi interests"—and shield the regime from accountability for the Khashoggi murder.

Jake Johnson

April 11, 2022

A private equity firm created by former White House adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner has reportedly secured a $2 billion investment from a sovereign wealth fund directed by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, a deal that watchdog groups and lawmakers viewed as part of Kushner's effort to cash in on his favorable treatment of the brutal Saudi regime.

"Just because the breathtaking corruption occurs in public doesn't make it not breathtaking."

The New York Times reported Sunday that Kushner's new firm, Affinity Partners, netted the investment six months after the end of the Trump administration "despite objections from the [Saudi] fund's advisers about the merits of the deal," heightening suspicions that the money is payback for Kushner's defense of bin Salman in the wake of the gruesome 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

 

The United Nations and U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that bin Salman, the de facto leader of Saudi Arabia, likely approved the Khashoggi assassination.

 

"As a top aide to Donald Trump, Jared Kushner spent years building ties and currying favor with Saudi Arabia," said Noah Bookbinder, the president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, in response to the Times story. "It's no surprise that an investment fund tied to the Saudi crown prince invested billions in Kushner's fund even though advisers raised objections."

 

Journalist Judd Legum added on Twitter, "Let's be very clear: Jared Kushner used his position in the White House to advance Saudi interests, including making sure Saudi wouldn't be held accountable for the brutal murder of a U.S.-based journalist."

 

"And now he's cashing in," Legum wrote.

____________________

 

How much was cooke complaining about with the Hunter biden "scandal".

 

How much was Hunter Biden paid? Like $1.6 million?

 

Compared to two billion dollars being given to a Kushner investment firm in which the Saudi's own advisers said that it wasn't a good investment?

 

Which basically means its a straight cash payoff.

 

.............and do we hear a single peep out of Cooke and all the other right-wingers about this?

[Mr. Impossible 409]

14 hours ago, jehurey said:

Then-White House senior adviser Jared Kushner stood among Saudi officials in the Oval Office at the White House on  March 20, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

'He's Cashing In': Kushner Firm Gets $2 Billion From Saudi Fund Run by Crown Prince

Watchdogs noted that the investment came after Kushner "used his position in the White House to advance Saudi interests"—and shield the regime from accountability for the Khashoggi murder.

Jake Johnson

April 11, 2022

A private equity firm created by former White House adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner has reportedly secured a $2 billion investment from a sovereign wealth fund directed by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, a deal that watchdog groups and lawmakers viewed as part of Kushner's effort to cash in on his favorable treatment of the brutal Saudi regime.

"Just because the breathtaking corruption occurs in public doesn't make it not breathtaking."

The New York Times reported Sunday that Kushner's new firm, Affinity Partners, netted the investment six months after the end of the Trump administration "despite objections from the [Saudi] fund's advisers about the merits of the deal," heightening suspicions that the money is payback for Kushner's defense of bin Salman in the wake of the gruesome 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

 

The United Nations and U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that bin Salman, the de facto leader of Saudi Arabia, likely approved the Khashoggi assassination.

 

"As a top aide to Donald Trump, Jared Kushner spent years building ties and currying favor with Saudi Arabia," said Noah Bookbinder, the president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, in response to the Times story. "It's no surprise that an investment fund tied to the Saudi crown prince invested billions in Kushner's fund even though advisers raised objections."

 

Journalist Judd Legum added on Twitter, "Let's be very clear: Jared Kushner used his position in the White House to advance Saudi interests, including making sure Saudi wouldn't be held accountable for the brutal murder of a U.S.-based journalist."

 

"And now he's cashing in," Legum wrote.

____________________

 

How much was cooke complaining about with the Hunter biden "scandal".

 

How much was Hunter Biden paid? Like $1.6 million?

 

Compared to two billion dollars being given to a Kushner investment firm in which the Saudi's own advisers said that it wasn't a good investment?

 

Which basically means its a straight cash payoff.

 

.............and do we hear a single peep out of Cooke and all the other right-wingers about this?

This wasn't even what I was talking about. Kushners real estate companies was about to hit an ice berg due to his stupidity and miraculously got a billion dollar bail out by banks with Saudi backing when he was in the white house. 

 

That means this motherfucker made nearly 3 billion dollars of suspicious money while in office. 

[Goukosan 2,256]

3 hours ago, Mr. Impossible said:

This wasn't even what I was talking about. Kushners real estate companies was about to hit an ice berg due to his stupidity and miraculously got a billion dollar bail out by banks with Saudi backing when he was in the white house. 

 

That means this motherfucker made nearly 3 billion dollars of suspicious money while in office. 

At minimum 3 billion while holding a white house position. 

 

Not a peep was heard from @Cookeand @Twinbladeabout this for four years.   Fair and balanced they say 

[Twinblade★ 3,925]

5 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

At minimum 3 billion while holding a white house position. 

 

Not a peep was heard from @Cookeand @Twinbladeabout this for four years.   Fair and balanced they say 

 
The media buried the Hunter Biden story and now they’re going to investigate Kushner? Where is the fairness that you’re referring to. Regardless nothing I read in that article is as bad as the ‘big guy’ moment from Hunter’s laptop. The VP potentially using his power and influence to make money off of his son’s business dealings is far more malicious….

[Goukosan 2,256]

3 minutes ago, Twinblade said:

 
The media buried the Hunter Biden story and now they’re going to investigate Kushner? Where is the fairness that you’re referring to. Regardless nothing I read in that article is as bad as the ‘big guy’ moment from Hunter’s laptop. The VP potentially using his power and influence to make money off of his son’s business dealings is far more malicious….

 

Still not a peep from you on Trump's children who used their positions in the white house to make billions in shady deals with the Chinese and the Saudi's.... 

 

 

And let's not Forget Trump's own unregistered offshore Swiss accounts while he was president, not actually divesting any of his businesses while president and his Tax return that he refused to make public for 6 years running....and last but not least.. Taking classified documents with him after he was no longer president, destroying and tearing up many of them 

Edited April 12, 2022 by Goukosan

[Mr. Impossible 409]

4 minutes ago, Twinblade said:

 
The media buried the Hunter Biden story and now they’re going to investigate Kushner? Where is the fairness that you’re referring to. Regardless nothing I read in that article is as bad as the ‘big guy’ moment from Hunter’s laptop. The VP potentially using his power and influence to make money off of his son’s business dealings is far more malicious….

 

lol you lying piece of shit. 

[jehurey 3,236]

58 minutes ago, Twinblade said:

 
The media buried the Hunter Biden story and now they’re going to investigate Kushner?

No they didn't bury any story

 

Hunter Biden actually has a job.

 

Joe Biden was out of office.

 

How are you going to convince anybody that $1.6 million transaction in the fucking ENERGY INDUSTRY is a big thing we need to pay attention about?

[Cooke 2,030]

4 hours ago, jehurey said:

No they didn't bury any story

 

Hunter Biden actually has a job.

 

Joe Biden was out of office.

 

How are you going to convince anybody that $1.6 million transaction in the fucking ENERGY INDUSTRY is a big thing we need to pay attention about?

What's his job exactly?

[Goukosan 2,256]

36 minutes ago, Cooke said:

What's his job exactly?

 

He had a position in the white house while his father was the most powerful man in the world and used that influence to get hundreds of millions of money from China as well as a ton of Chinese patents.  

 

His spouse who also got a position in the white house also used the influence of his father again who was the most powerful man in the world, to get 3 billion dollars from the Saudis. 

 

Oh wait... That was Trump's children and their spouses 

[jehurey 3,236]

2 hours ago, Cooke said:

What's his job exactly?

So you've lost the argument, and are now trying to go off in any tangent you can find?

 

Sorry, that's not going to happen.

[Mr. Impossible 409]

On 2022-04-12 at 4:13 PM, Goukosan said:

At minimum 3 billion while holding a white house position. 

 

Not a peep was heard from @Cookeand @Twinbladeabout this for four years.   Fair and balanced they say 

 

So far they dont seem to have any issue with it lol. They gave Kushner money to start a company from scratch that he has no experience in. They dont have a single issue with this lol. 

[Cooke 2,030]

21 hours ago, Mr. Impossible said:

 

So far they dont seem to have any issue with it lol. They gave Kushner money to start a company from scratch that he has no experience in. They dont have a single issue with this lol. 

You guys are so fucking dense. My issue is with the media. What these sleazy sons of presidents do is not the issue im trying to convey. The media talked shit about kushner all the time, it wasn't a banned topic on Twitter, direct message's containing information about Kushner weren't blocked etc etc. Big tech and most of the MSM is HEAVILY biased toward one side. If you dont see this then you are dumber than you look. 

[Mr. Impossible 409]

1 hour ago, Cooke said:

You guys are so fucking dense. My issue is with the media. What these sleazy sons of presidents do is not the issue im trying to convey. The media talked shit about kushner all the time, it wasn't a banned topic on Twitter, direct message's containing information about Kushner weren't blocked etc etc. Big tech and most of the MSM is HEAVILY biased toward one side. If you dont see this then you are dumber than you look. 

Lol nigga you look like Charlie Brown, STFU. "i don't care about corruption, I care about how much press it gets." is as dishonest as it is stupid.

 

There's  kind of a bit of difference between reporting about a white house employee that basically oversaw every major platform of the administration and reporting some suspicious laptop of a candidate's son that was acquired by suspicious means. 

 

The only reason you have an issue here is because right wing media told you to. The real reason you don't have an issue with the Kushner stuff is you never even knew about it. 

 

For some reason you and Twincel have some complete media blind spot for anything critical of conversatives or the right. 

[jehurey 3,236]

1 hour ago, Cooke said:

You guys are so fucking dense. My issue is with the media.

Really...............cause I don't see "the media" as the topic of this thread

 

How many times have you referred to "the media" in your posts?

 

You have talked about Hunter Biden and Joe Biden..............not the media, as your main subject.

 

You're lying right now.

[Mr. Impossible 409]

On 2022-04-15 at 4:36 PM, jehurey said:

Really...............cause I don't see "the media" as the topic of this thread

 

How many times have you referred to "the media" in your posts?

 

You have talked about Hunter Biden and Joe Biden..............not the media, as your main subject.

 

You're lying right now.

lol He immediately jumped from this ship. Without ever actually talking about "the media"

[Cooke 2,030]

On 2022-04-15 at 1:36 PM, jehurey said:

Really...............cause I don't see "the media" as the topic of this thread

 

How many times have you referred to "the media" in your posts?

 

You have talked about Hunter Biden and Joe Biden..............not the media, as your main subject.

 

You're lying right now.

My title of the thread implies it dumbass. The laptop that doesn't exist? Who the fuck was saying it was Russian disinformation?  THE MEDIA. And stinky twats like you that just accept everything they say as fact without looking at biases and who is saying it. 

Edited April 29, 2022 by Cooke

[Mr. Impossible 409]

42 minutes ago, Cooke said:

My title of the thread implies it dumbass. The laptop that doesn't exist? Who the fuck was saying it was Russian disinformation?  THE MEDIA. And stinky twats like you that just accept everything they say as fact without looking at biases and who is saying it. 

Maybe he was confused because the OP had a clip of "the media" talking about the laptop embedded.