Starfield has framerate drops down to… wait for it.. 7 fps

[jehurey 3,238]

1 hour ago, Substatic said:

 

How was that even bait lol, I literally just called out hypocrisy. PS5 has so many 30 fps games.

No, there is no hypocrisy

 

Unless you point out to me which Playstation executive was talking about 60fps and 120fps games in their social media.

 

I'll wait for your evidence of this hypocrisy that you speak of.

 

Because what you just attempted was "whataboutism". You didn't actually FIND ANY hypocrisy, now did you?

[jehurey 3,238]

1 hour ago, Substatic said:

It literally is at Gamespot. Last I looked it was 71 vs 45. Last gen was 445 vs 298. And that's on top of having the far better version of most games that overlap and exponentially superior online.  There is a reason GS:SW stopped doing the meta game, the middle of last gen PC's lead was so big (biggest in any gen) they stopped caring. It was literally over. No shot. Same is happening this time. PC literally broke the concept of SW metagaming.

No, you already remember Gouko proving you wrong

 

This is established.

 

Little too late for you to attempt amnesia again.

 

Oh, and if you are now using gamespot......................then Starfield is a 7/10

Edited September 2, 2023 by jehurey

[TLHBO 2,162]

I skimmed someone playing this just to see how bad it was. Every planet was a barren fucking wasteland You didnt even need to explore the planets the game just loaded you next to the objective, making the whole "planet jumping space exploration" thing just a loading screen to the next area.

 

Game looks

[Substatic 421]

9 hours ago, jehurey said:

No, you already remember Gouko proving you wrong

 

 

He used Metacritic, and used only 1 year. When including the entire gen, PC won at both GS and MC. This gen too, so far (as I just checked and posted the numbers ITT last night). PC basically yeeted and deleted the SW metagame due to how far ahead it was/is.

 

9 hours ago, jehurey said:

 

 

Oh, and if you are now using gamespot......................then Starfield is a 7/10

 

I'm fine with that, as long as PC is winning by a good amount there. 

[jehurey 3,238]

6 hours ago, Substatic said:

 

He used Metacritic, and used only 1 year.

and you are running to open critic..........which nobody here uses

 

so, you are now FINALLY admitting that he's right, and accurate.

 

Thanks for the admission.

[Substatic 421]

20 hours ago, jehurey said:

and you are running to open critic. 

 

It's 88% at MC too. Doesn't matter MC or GS though, PC won at both places last gen and winning this gen at both places.

[Mr. House 3,371]

All my Starfield predictions are coming to life.  

 

 

 

[jehurey 3,238]

1 hour ago, Substatic said:

 

It's 88% at MC too. Doesn't matter MC or GS though, PC won at both places last gen

No they didn't
 

Like you already admitted to, gouko proved you wrong.

 

PC has less reviews than the Xbox version, so its less accurate.

 

Its 87 at metacritic.

 

Its pathetic that you are trying to lie to yourself so much, go do it privately, because it will get called out when you attempt it here, every time.

[Substatic 421]

4 hours ago, jehurey said:

 

 

PC has less reviews than the Xbox version, so its less accurate.

 

 

Nah, it's much better. 30fps vs 100+. Why cry about 88% lol.

 

4 hours ago, jehurey said:

 
 

Like you already admitted to, gouko proved you wrong.

 

 

He was discussing 1 year, I was discussing an entire gen. A red-herring and goal post move is hardly "being proven wrong". PC won last gen, and by a large margin. It's winning this gen by a large margin too. 

[jehurey 3,238]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

Nah, it's much better

No, we're talking about the review.

Don't attempt to change the subject, because what I said was correct.

 

Less review = Less accurate

 

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

 

He was discussing 1 year, I was discussing an entire gen.

No, you already know this he did a whole comparison of a period of a console generation, and proved your claim wrong.

 

Sorry, you attempting to retcon things isn't going to help you.

[Remij 4,686]

4 hours ago, jehurey said:

PC has less reviews than the Xbox version, so its less accurate.

Opencritic takes all reviews into account.. and the score is 88... so the PC version is actually MORE accurate.

[jehurey 3,238]

1 minute ago, Remij said:

Opencritic takes all reviews into account.. and the score is 88... so the PC version is actually MORE accurate.

So you just referred to a website that takes highly suspicious websites into its count.

 

...............to argue that its MORE accurate

Yeah...........naw that's not gonna work.

 

But you are telling me that

 

A) You've ran away from Gamespot, which is why you're to be made fun of

B.) You've now run away Metacritic, which means you're to be made even more fun of

[Remij 4,686]

5 minutes ago, jehurey said:

So you just referred to a website that takes highly suspicious websites into its count.

 

...............to argue that its MORE accurate

Yeah...........naw that's not gonna work.

 

But you are telling me that

 

A) You've ran away from Gamespot, which is why you're to be made fun of

B.) You've now run away Metacritic, which means you're to be made even more fun of

C.) PC wins at all of them.

 

Cry about it somewhere else.  Maybe go play an Xbox game or something..

[jehurey 3,238]

5 minutes ago, Remij said:

C.) PC wins at all of them.

 

No, a 7 at gamespot doesn't win at anything

 

And like I said, on Metacritic the PC review has less reviews, thus less accurate.

 

Which is correct.

 

I'm not the one crying about wanting to use OpenCriticYou are.

 

Moreso than Subtwatic, now.

[Remij 4,686]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

No, a 7 at gamespot doesn't win at anything

 

And like I said, on Metacritic the PC review has less reviews, thus less accurate.

 

Which is correct.

 

I'm not the one crying about wanting to use OpenCriticYou are.

 

Moreso than Subtwatic, now.

88 Meta

88 Open

 

Cry more.

[jehurey 3,238]

1 minute ago, Remij said:

88 Meta

 

that is less accurate

 

Its amazing, how I'm just explaining what you continually leave out

 

and then you try to reset, and PARTIALLY give out the truth

 

Sounds like something a crybaby would do

[Substatic 421]

23 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, we're talking about the review.

 

 

Starfield on PC currently has a 88%. I don't know why you're lying.

 

 

 

 

[Remij 4,686]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

that is less accurate

 

Its amazing, how I'm just explaining what you continually leave out

 

and then you try to reset, and PARTIALLY give out the truth

 

Sounds like something a crybaby would do

Nope, this is an 88 meta game as it stands.  No amount of you crying is going to change that as it stands right now.

 

88 Meta, 88 Open

 

PC version is better, and PC wins in both places.  

[jehurey 3,238]

2 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

Starfield on PC currently has a 88%. I don't know why you're lying.

 

 

 

 

How am I lying.

 

its has less reviews than the Xbox version, correct?

 

The moment you confirm this.............you've effectively proven that I'm not lying.

 

Go ahead, confirm it so that you can lose this new argument attempt that you are making.

2 minutes ago, Remij said:

Nope, this is an 88 meta game as it stands

as having less reviews as the Xbox version, thus being less accurate of a score.

 

I love how you clearly aren't discrediting anything that I have already said in the slightest.

[Remij 4,686]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

as having less reviews as the Xbox version, thus being less accurate of a score.

 

I love how you clearly aren't discrediting anything that I have already said in the slightest.

It's not less accurate... because when you take all those reviews from the Xbox and PC versions, and find the average, it's 88.

 

So THAT is the actual score.  88.