Remij 4,712 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Exactly like I said Quote Link to post Share on other sites
-GD-X★ 7,805 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 they were robbed on xbone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Playstation Tablet 1,746 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Took 8 years to be a semi functional game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,695 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Better than Binner Blade Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 1 hour ago, Remij said: Exactly like I said Based on 4 critic reviews Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted April 29 Author Share Posted April 29 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Goukosan said: Based on 4 critic reviews 4 new critic reviews which is entirely the point Edited April 29 by Remij Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Just now, Remij said: 4 new critic reviews It's only 4 reviews. Granted Sea of thieves is better now after 8 years of updates, but using meta for 4 reviews? Lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted April 29 Author Share Posted April 29 1 minute ago, Goukosan said: It's only 4 reviews. Granted Sea of thieves is better now after 8 years of updates, but using meta for 4 reviews? Lol It's not that serious... Clearly I'm making this thread because of how much I've argued for this game's gameplay loop over the years and how the game has improved. I've always maintained the game was always better than what the initial reviews would say. I'm simply confident we'll see now a better picture of what the game actually deserves today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 11 minutes ago, Remij said: It's not that serious... Clearly I'm making this thread because of how much I've argued for this game's gameplay loop over the years and how the game has improved. I've always maintained the game was always better than what the initial reviews would say. I'm simply confident we'll see now a better picture of what the game actually deserves today. Yes it's not serious at all.. But The game wasn't better than the initial reviews said. Rare over promised and under delivered at launch. Reviewers can't review a game on its potential to be a better game in 8 to 10 years time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted April 29 Author Share Posted April 29 Just now, Goukosan said: Yes it's not serious at all.. But The game wasn't better than the initial reviews said. Rare over promised and under delivered at launch. Reviewers can't review a game on its potential to be a better game in 8 to 10 years time. Yes it was better, even back then. The game was always better than 4s and 5s out of 10. The gameplay loop is 100% solid, and there was hours and hours of gameplay there. It's simply better now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 1 minute ago, Remij said: Yes it was better, even back then. The game was always better than 4s and 5s out of 10. The gameplay loop is 100% solid, and there was hours and hours of gameplay there. It's simply better now. Nah it got what it deserved then, it's a better game now and is getting better scores now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,695 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Lmfao goobs is soo fucking bothered by xbox games Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted April 29 Author Share Posted April 29 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Goukosan said: Nah it got what it deserved then, it's a better game now and is getting better scores now. We don't have to regurgitate the old argument when that's not the point. The game has been better for years and years already even if you consider your viewpoint... so it didn't "take 8 years" to make it better... It's taken 8 years for the game to be reviewed again. My entire point has always been that if the game was reviewed again, and this is true for the last 7 years... that it would score differently than before which I've always felt wasn't truly reflective of it, even back then. Edited April 29 by Remij Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,164 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 It's must be from the tools maturing in the last 8 years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted April 29 Author Share Posted April 29 Just now, lynux3 said: It's must be from the tools maturing in the last 8 years. You guys have indeed matured a bit since then Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 1 minute ago, Remij said: We don't have to regurgitate the old argument when that's not the point. The game has been better for years and years already even if you consider your viewpoint... so it didn't "take 8 years" to make it better... It's taken 8 years for the game to be reviewed again. My entire point has always been that if the game was reviewed again, and this is true for the last 7 years... that it would score differently than before which I've always felt wasn't truly reflective of it. That's great and all, but that's not the same as saying the game was just as good at launch when it got reviewed as is now. Again it's not that serious, we can also wait for more then four reviews as well Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 1 minute ago, lynux3 said: It's must be from the tools maturing in the last 8 years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,164 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Just now, Remij said: You guys have indeed matured a bit since then Maybe it's the sampler feedback! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted April 29 Author Share Posted April 29 3 minutes ago, Goukosan said: That's great and all, but that's not the same as saying the game was just as good at launch when it got reviewed as is now. Again it's not that serious, we can also wait for more then four reviews as well Never said that though. I just said that it didn't deserve the completely terrible reviews of 4s and 5s back then. It was a solid game back then... now it's better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,695 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 It's not that serious guyz.....buttt ackshawly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.