jehurey

a 30 something "having issues" is not extremely rare. In fact its when they begin to have issues. every year that passes, you are more compromised than the previous. you are saying things to yourself that are quite short-sighted.

you're basically saying as long as a "medical complication" doesn't occur to you, you don't have to worry about your compromised lung capacity from being a problem in the event of an emergency.

LOL no, smoking doesn't have any OUTWARDLY visible effect that appears to be life-threatening when you are in your 30's. You have weak lungs. If your body has to undergo something, or suffers an emergency attack, your lungs won't survive long enough in a situation in which they need to give you oxygen within a matter of minutes.

Japanese media is reporting that Kim Jung Un is in a "vegetative state". On Monday, the Daily NK (an online newspaper in South Korea run by North Korean defectors who have contacts in the country) reported that Kim Jong-un had had surgery on April 12th and was recovering. Reuters subsequently picked it up and ran the story internationally. CNN picked it up and went to its sources in U.S. intelligence, who weren't willing to be named but said they were monitoring reports that Kim wasn't doing well. On Tuesday, U.S. National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien acknowle

.............while losing GTA5 on Gamepass. Game with more replay value, and longer-lasting multiplayer. RDR2 does look very pretty though. But anybody who already plunked down $500 for an XBX would know that already, so they almost certainly paid the full $60 for the game when it came out 18 months ago.

I kept on replying with actual responses, actually trying to make an egaging discussion. You DROPPED YOUR ACT........and went straight to calling me stupid. Nobody would lose their shit with 3 posts of me engaging in such discussion. You're not fooling anybody. Look at your post, right now.............I don't need to do anything except tell other people to observe you're first few sentences. What did I "argue my way out of"?????????? My question was already answered, and I had no other business in this post. YOU created an argument. N

Sorry the "put in this much effort" tactic isn't going to work, either. ...........look at your own posts. You melting down like an absolutely complete bitch. And the people seeing this are going to know that you are doing this because you got angry over a QUESTION being asked??????? Who's going to believe your side of the story. LOL You've been in "check" this entire time, on the chessboard. lol

No........nobody has ever lost their shit, this badly, over ANY type of question. You're not going to cover up what you did here........you melted down badly. That's not my problem. You know you messed up, you're trying right now to think I'm the one who's lost their shit over this. That ain't workin', 'neither. Its not my fault you're acting like a bitch. You control that. Not me.

No........you don't get to dictate how I post. People post questions all the time. Nobody turns into a bitch over them. ..........except you ........over mines. That's not my problem That's not anybody elses problem in this forum. That is, exclusively..........your problem. And nobody can solve it for you. Except you. Put at least half the effort in solving that as you do being a complete and utter bitch, and maybe you might make progress.

......and now you're losing your shit, again. Yes I did catch you lying........you specifically said: You are clearly talking about my first post...........you not saying that all of the other talking points I made afterward were stupid. In fact, you even AGREED with one of them. You just got busted, and you know it.............because you're now REALLY pissed. Dude......the only one that can stop you from losing your shit, is you.

No.......you were not calling my sentence structure of Digital Game License talking points stupid. You went and declared that my ORIGINAL post, my original question, was stupid. I just caught you lying. And secondly, yes. There's temporary free to play stuff all the game on games. Division 2 free weekends, etc. You're not looking good. I would've advised you to cut your losses, but you are clearly in a "sunk-cost fallacy" mode now. And its going to end like all of your other "sunk cost fallacy" meltdowns from before.

You were clearly trying to instigate from the beginning. I actually gave you the benefit of the doubt for the first couple of posts.......I thought "maybe he wants to explain something" But you didn't want to explain......in fact I was going on about "word clarifyers" and stuff like that, and also talking about how the Digital Game License could theoretically make a "temporary ownership" possible. You gave yourself away and by no longer wanting to talk about that.............you went straight to your ultimate punchline: Jerry is stupid and he made a stupid q

You know that you look like a bitch, so you are trying to reset the argument. Sorry, I'm not trying to flame my way out, because you don't have an argument............you're just ranting, and were trying to "earn some points" against me. That became obvious the moment you tried to say I was making a "stupid question" That's when I realize that you were actually not wanting to discuss anything in earnest, but rather just butthurt about me. Sorry...........your attempts to project onto me just aren't going to work. My question was already answered (mos

I love how you now trying to put words in my mouth. I said you're being a bitch..............that has nothing to do whether I want you to be nice to me. I said: Notice how one of us is trying to flame their way out of this thread because they are completely done. lol

Instead you put much, much, MUCH more effort into being a full blown bitch. I didn't ask you to be "nice" to me.............you seem to think that I have a problem with you being a bitch. I'm just treating you like a bitch, because you're clearly begging to be treated like one.

No...............you pretending to know what Clinton is trying to do isn't going to work,either. Oh dude................I am under your skin, really good if you are scrambling back and forth trying to find something to respond to. LOL And he just now double-posted like jonb or ghost would do.............yup he definitely doesn't look bitch-pinched, at all.

Sorry...........trying to respond like Dynocrap isn't going to work, either. And, this is an admission that you are now finally aware that your posts looked like the rantings of a bitch. Thanks for finally getting over that hump. it was starting to look cringey.

He just pretended to completely forget this part He already knows he fucked up, and he's trying to salvage his OVER-reaction.. ................with more OVER-reaction. Look at Clinton's post..........he answered it, and even he wasn't definitive. Poor remij is losing his shit because he knows he looks like a bitch, and thinks he can bitch his way out of it. That's not going to work.

Yes you do have a motive in this thread. Clinton ALREADY ANSWERED the question.............and I was not posting anymore. Dude...........did you forget that part. You then proceeded to come in.......to BE a bitch. Why are you trying to pretend otherwise? lol And then, you couldn't even win that argument, because when I explained to you the potential for how your sentence could be improperly structured...........you didn't understand at first. And now, you're arguing out of spite. Bitch from beginning to end. I got no probl

You didn't make anything painfully obvious. It is your fault, however, that you react like a bitch. And its very simple........I see a bitch, I will merely treat him as such. Nobody has instigated anything............except you acting like a bitch. I asked a simple question, and it got answered by somebody rather simplistically. Because there was no other ulterior motive. You, in your infinite wisdom........decided to overthink it. And now you're trying to salvage your over-reaction.

It was answered by somebody who wasn't in a mood to be bitchy because they have pent up butthurt towards me (Clinton) You.......on the other hand, couldn't resist. And especially since I had to explain basic sentence structure to you, and it seemed like you didn't understand........my question isn't stupid because of whom I'm dealing with. Your response thus far is proof that I have ample reason to question.

Except digital games, and their license specifically CAN make that possible. So how would that be a stupid question? Especially considering that, for a while there, you seem to have trouble understand that you may have split up a clarifying expression in that sentence by moving it to the end?

Except keep inherently means something permanent. If it isn't, that is clarified immediately afterwards. Which in that sentence it isn't...........and you wouldn't put a clarifying statement on the opposite end of that sentence. That's just bad form, all around. No, it isn't obvious. You're 6th grade teacher would've marked it up.

Except "keep" is the word that is used. "Play" is never used.

Dynocrap is trying to play stupid and not know the difference between a developer and a publisher? He ends up embarrassing himself, yet again.