Jump to content

Why are the left biology deniers and the right climate change deniers?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

“Scientifical” 

You are too complacent 

The fucking left think this is a documentary   

2 hours ago, McWicked said:

That's exactly how this works:

 

2013-updated_scientific-method-steps_v6_

 

You don't assume shit.

The results have been communicated: there are two genders. Though, you can again, say whatever you want. I can identify as a giraff. According the the vast majority of the world, I’m still a man. The majority is what makes “facts.” There are no “facts” that the majority of the world disagree with. 

 

Caitlyn Jenner is a man. 100%, no questions asked. I have no problem with them wanting the appearance of a woman. Go for it. But you’re a man, lol. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is this?! REGRET?!

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thewrap.com/caitlyn-jenner-experienced-sex-change-regret-might-de-transition-biographer-says/amp/

 

well if you identidy as a female, get a transition, regret it, did you EVER biolicaly think you were a woman? No, you wanted to be a woman bc it seemed more appealing you bc you WERENT one. 

 

How is can you identify as something you have no idea what they are feeing? Men will NEVER understand pregnancy, men will NEVER have some of the things women go through. You can’t truly identify as something you don’t know the identify of. Common fucking sense here people :tom:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for herms, one set usually doesn’t work or neither work. They are mutations, but not in a good way. They are errors. Any human produced that can’t replicate is an error. 

 

Being gay gay might be a trait in all of us to end our own species for whatever reason for all we know. This isn’t insensitive, it’s looking at the reason for homosexuality. There is a reason, we just don’t know yet. 

Edited by ghostz
Link to post
Share on other sites

The two NPCs bringing evolution into this. What you guys don't see to realize is even after million of years of evolution, life has only give two genders for all species. :D

 

Life has yet to make a third one. :D Maybe in 2 billion years, a third one will pop out. Hasn't happened yet (because life has no use for it).

 

If you looked at the chromosome composition of Cathleen Jenner, it would prove without a doubt that he is in fact, a man.

 

You guys can't refute science. Admit that there are only two genders or sit the fuck down. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ramza said:

 

If you looked at the chromosome composition of Cathleen Jenner, it would prove without a doubt that he is in fact, a man.

 

 

Nothing more to say. And a question I’ll leave you with: how can someone identify as something they’ve never been? They don’t know the identity of what they’re trying to become. Lmao. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Cookester15 said:

I think we need a peer reviewed study on whether water is wet or not. 

You joke, but it's probably been done.  Science builds off of other science.  That's how we got to the moon.

 

People thought the earth was flat for thousands of years until it was proven to be round.  Just because there's a history of a belief, that doesn't make the belief true.  Why else do you think the scientific method is so successful?

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, ghostz said:

As for herms, one set usually doesn’t work or neither work. They are mutations, but not in a good way. They are errors. Any human produced that can’t replicate is an error. 

 

Being gay gay might be a trait in all of us to end our own species for whatever reason for all we know. This isn’t insensitive, it’s looking at the reason for homosexuality. There is a reason, we just don’t know yet. 

Hermaphrodites are pregnancy defects. In the first few stages of growth we actually all have both genders, or at least show signs of both but eventually the chromosomes shapes us with the genitals of a man or female. 

 

Hermaphrodites are a chromosome error. They end up with both sexes but they aren't a third gender. Lol at Jerry for thinking that if they reproduced it would be a new gender. First most of them are sterile in one way or another and secondly, it might not even be a hereditary condition.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Water isn't actually wet, water makes the surface of other objects wet.

 

just sayin' :cmpunk1:

Which is why it needs to be peer reviewed! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If someone truly identifies as a female (again, for a male, this is is impossible as they’ve never been female) how could they ever have regret?

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/transgender-women-transgender-men-sex-change-sex-reassignment-surgery-676777%3famp=1

 

Does this mean that it’s acrually just a case of someone wanting something they can’t have? BINGO.. outside of mental illness, no one truly wants one.  They just think they do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, McWicked said:

You joke, but it's probably been done.  Science builds off of other science.  That's how we got to the moon.

 

People thought the earth was flat for thousands of years until it was proven to be round.  Just because there's a history of a belief, that doesn't make the belief true.  Why else do you think the scientific method is so successful?

You mean like Pokemon games being one game? :tom:

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cookester15 said:

Which is why it needs to be peer reviewed! 

Now you're mocking peer-reviewed studies in a thread you made asking why there are biology deniers.  Sounds like you've found your answer. :smug: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, McWicked said:

You joke, but it's probably been done.  Science builds off of other science.  That's how we got to the moon.

 

People thought the earth was flat for thousands of years until it was proven to be round.  Just because there's a history of a belief, that doesn't make the belief true.  Why else do you think the scientific method is so successful?

There is not once ounce of credible science that supports more genders 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

 

You mean like Pokemon games being one game? :tom:

Since when was identifying a video game considered a form of science?

 

Wow, this guy is BUTT................HURT in some serious ways. LOL

 

That was actually more pathetic than DavidP responding back with a 20-year old George Carlin bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, McWicked said:

Now you're mocking peer-reviewed studies in a thread you made asking why there are biology deniers.  Sounds like you've found your answer. :smug: 

So easily manipulated . Here's some college professors that did some bogus studies that were accepted and peer reviewed 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, McWicked said:

You get asked for a peer-reviewed study in a thread about biology deniers and you post Joe Rogan?

 

Ummm hello? 

 

The video is about how easy it is to get a peer reviewed study in the social and gender study fields. Its absolutely ridiculous.  If you want to find a peer reviewed study on why I can identify as a lesbian lumberjack unicorn crossdresser then you can, if you can't find it you can write your own and it will be reviewed :aitch:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...