Jump to content

Digital Foundry: Sniper Elite 3 a superb Switch convertion. Switch version runs better than base X1. version.


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Goukosan said:

Yes.. DF said those ports were trash.... And we agree... its trash.  What is there to argue? :shrug:

 

The only faction that argues against DF is the delusional lemmings. Well they only argue when Xbox loses.... when Xbox wins DF is right and on point..... but any slight against Xbox?  Then DF are hacks and they're wrong :cries:

 

 

Lmfao. 

you're absolutely right.

 

I hadn't notice it, but the pattern is obvious.

 

The ONLY people on this forum who have ever outright rejected what Digital Foundry has said, multiple times, throughout the past 2-3 years................are lemmings or xbox-apologists, which let's fact, that's a lemming who's too embarrassed is trying to pretend they aren't one.

 

no one has ever melted down over DF videos and actively tried to fight back against them as lemmings and lemming-adjacents.

 

how embarrassing:tom:

 

it is what it is, and there's nothing they can do about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Six pages on a game that scored a 6; how fitting. 

Seems like the XO version with vsync enabled is better.     Switch is still the worst version bro.  Sorry.. you tried valiently  

It almost never dips though.  And it's also far less distracting than the stutter/drops that the Switch version exhibits when shooting and going into X-ray mode.   

Posted Images

11 hours ago, Remij_ said:

Why would you think I didn't read the OP?  I've stated in many posts already that the game tears a single frame in 5 min from what they've shown... adaptive vsync.. is still... vsynced. 

 

It would be a point... if the XO droped frames like the Switch version... but it does not.  He's comparing 2 very different things... and you're conflating what he's saying.

 

So no.  You just have to deal with the fact that Tom fucked up and didn't even realize that the XO version had a 30fps lock.

 

You're NOT changing that detail.  And you're NOT changing the fact that he said that 30fps was more consistent and thus preferable to a fluctuating 30-60fps... which it is.. except the XO has been patched since then.

 

Don't ever try it again with me

:tophat2:

   gun1.png

The patch was already addressed by DF aaaaaand it still drops frames and tears :lawl:

 

 

DF has spoken, the switch version is better than the base XB1.    Take up their conclusions with them. 

 

OWNED :fella:

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

The patch was already addressed by DF aaaaaand it still drops frames and tears :lawl:

 

 

DF has spoken, the switch version is better than the base XB1.    Take up their conclusions with them. 

 

OWNED :fella:

They never showed the XO version updated... because they didn't even know it existed.  It drops a single frame, and tears once in 5 min.

 

Meanwhile in the Switch version drops frames every time it goes into x-ray mode.. goes into a new area..  has polygonal edges like Virtua fighter.. no ambient occlusion :mj: 

 

It's not my fault that you're intentionally misunderstanding what Tom was referring to when he said the Switch was preferable... which was 30fps vs fluctuating 30-60fps.  And it's CERTAINLY NOT MY FAULT that he says "in fact.. I wish PS4 had a 30fps cap all things considered" which proves that he had no idea that the game had been patched since the initial analysis.

 

Tom should do his job better.

 

:tophat2:

   gun1.png

Edited by Remij_
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

They never showed the XO version updated... because they didn't even know it existed.  It drops a single frame, and tears once in 5 min.

 

Meanwhile in the Switch version drops frames every time it goes into x-ray mode.. goes into a new area..  has polygonal edges like Virtua fighter.. no ambient occlusion :mj: 

 

It's not my fault that you're intentionally misunderstanding what Tom was referring to when he said the Switch was preferable... which was 30fps vs fluctuating 30-60fps.  And it's CERTAINLY NOT MY FAULT that he says "in fact.. I wish PS4 had a 30fps cap all things considered" which proves that he had no idea that the game had been patched since the initial analysis.

 

Tom should do his job better.

 

:tophat2:

   gun1.png

No Ambient Occlusion on Switch? Ok now you just confirmed you didn't actually watch the or read DF analysis. 

 

DF - "ambient occlusion - the shade between objects - has a somewhat thicker look on Switch"  :shrug:

 

 

 

 

 

As far as base XB1 is concerned. 

 

 

"Xbox One launch day patch adds a v-sync option. It's actually an adaptive v-sync that appears to lock gameplay to 30fps, with occasional tearing when the engine dips below that target, as you can see from the videos below" 

 

 

Bbbut DF never addressed the patch.... they didn't do their jobs right :cries:

 

 

Still drops and still tears even with the patch.... owned :fella:

Edited by Goukosan
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Goukosan said:

"Xbox One launch day patch adds a v-sync option. It's actually an adaptive v-sync that appears to lock gameplay to 30fps, with occasional tearing when the engine dips below that target, as you can see from the videos below" 

 

 

Bbbut DF never addressed the patch.... they didn't do their jobs right :cries:

 

 

Still drops and still tears even with the patch.... owned :fella:

They address it.... in the original face off article... that SOME GUY NOT NAMED TOM MORGAN.. did.  Tom Morgan HAD NO FUCKING IDEA THAT A 30FPS LOCK EXISTED... and was comparing the fluctuating 30-60fps of the XO to the 30fps of the Switch.  TOM.... DID NOT ADDRESS IT in the Switch video.

 

The FACT that he says "in fact.. I wish PS4 had a 30fps cap all things considered" proves that he has no idea that the option is there.... and has been there since launch day on XO.

 

Being stupid and not understanding that isn't going to help your argument.

 

:denzel3:

  gun1.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

They address it.... in the original face off article... that SOME GUY NOT NAMED TOM MORGAN.. did.  Tom Morgan HAD NO FUCKING IDEA THAT A 30FPS LOCK EXISTED... and was comparing the fluctuating 30-60fps of the XO to the 30fps of the Switch.  TOM.... DID NOT ADDRESS IT in the Switch video.

 

The FACT that he says "in fact.. I wish PS4 had a 30fps cap all things considered" proves that he has no idea that the option is there.... and has been there since launch day on XO.

 

Being stupid and not understanding that isn't going to help your argument.

 

:denzel3:

  gun1.png

Remij talking about being stupid after this happened... :lawl:

 

Bbbut no ambient occlusion..... oh wait its there? :grimaceright:

 

 

Bbbut DF never addressed the patch..... ohh wait they did? :grimaceleft:

 

 

and that same Vsync patch still drops frames and tears.... you can't spin past that... owned :fella:

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

Remij talking about being stupid after this happened... :lawl:

 

Bbbut no ambient occlusion..... oh wait its there? :grimaceright:

 

 

Bbbut DF never addressed the patch..... ohh wait they did? :grimaceleft:

 

 

and that same Vsync patch still drops frames and tears.... you can't spin past that... owned :fella:

You... talking about graphics at all :mj:

 

Yes... missing ambient occlusion

 

fdsssss.png

 

TOM.... didn't address the patch... bitch :reg:

 

and that vsynced version which drops was less frames than Switch.... and extremely rarely tears.  

 

Gouko... do yourself a favor.. and shut the fuck up.. you don't know shit :tom: 

                                                                                                                                  gun1.png

Edited by Remij_
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, Goukosan said:

Remij talking about being stupid after this happened... :lawl:

 

Bbbut no ambient occlusion..... oh wait its there? :grimaceright:

 

 

Bbbut DF never addressed the patch..... ohh wait they did? :grimaceleft:

 

 

and that same Vsync patch still drops frames and tears.... you can't spin past that... owned :fella:

What are you even arguing? He's right, Tom was completely oblivious to the games 30 FPS mode for Xbox and was simply rambling on comparing the wildly inconsistent 60 FPS mode.

 

"The big payoff here is it's all in aid of hitting 30 frames per second, a performance cap the other consoles didn't use"

 

He is wholly unaware, his whole hambone speel about everything with the Xbox One is related to the 60 FPS mode, he has absolutely zero idea the 30 FPS mode exists. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

You... talking about graphics at all :mj:

 

Yes... missing ambient occlusion

 

fdsssss.png

 

TOM.... didn't address the patch... bitch :reg:

 

and that vsynced version which drops was less frames than Switch.... and extremely rarely tears.  

 

Gouko... do yourself a favor.. and shut the fuck up.. you don't know shit :tom: 

                                                                                                                                  gun1.png

There's video of the Switch game running with Ambient occlusion in the analysis.... Remij posts a screenshot :rofls:

 

So you said all that to admit base XB1 still drops frames AND TEARS... just like I said.

 

Owned :fella:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Goukosan said:

There's video of the Switch game running with Ambient occlusion in the analysis.... Remij posts a screenshot :rofls:

 

So you said all that to admit base XB1 still drops frames AND TEARS... just like I said.

 

Owned :fella:

 

I posted a pic from DF's video of the Switch version... which CLEARLY shows it missing AO.  You see... I even put the red squares around some of the areas... so you would actually know where to look :hest: 

 

So yea... TOM didn't address shit... which is why he did a bad job... and was comparing the 30fps consistent Switch version against the 30-60fps fluctuating XO version pre-patch.

 

Now run along kiddo. :tom5:

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Remij... one screenshot means the entire game doesn't have it and that the video showing the game running with ambient occlusion doesn't exist :rofls:..... 

 

 

 

Base X1 Still drops and tears... can't spin that... owned:fella:

 

 

 

Edited by Goukosan
Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

Yes Remij... one screenshot means the entire game doesn't have it and that the video showing the game running with ambient occlusion doesn't exist :rofls:..... 

 

 

 

Base X1 Still drops and tears... can't spin that... owned:fella:

 

 

 

Do you know what's most retarded about all of this beyond just you? The game saw like 10 updates post launch, if any of these people were concerned about objective reporting they would have recompared the games properly. Even more than this they would have tested the same things. Instead what happened is Tom went half-cocked into this with outdated information, with information related to an older build without the realization that there is a mode on Xbox One which is capped to 30 FPS. He had no earthly idea that was even a thing.

 

Who cares if you get a one off 2 FPS blip in 5 minutes of gameplay with a half second tear in the bottom 95th of the screen? Absolutely nobody, you'd never even see it. Even funnier is like I said, the game saw like 10 updates after this. Switch has those blips as well and they appear more frequent, Switch also has a 15 FPS cave where the framerate tanks. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

 

How is that better? It's not, it's not even debatable, it's factually worse, FACTUALLY. Couple this with the Switch version being lower resolution, having lower geometry levels, having missing effects and lighting elements, worse texturing and lower levels of AO, and you have the definitive worse version of the game by a longshot, it's not even close.

 

You have to be literally retarded to argue superiority in this, not figuratively, literally retarded. Are you literally retarded?

Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

Yes Remij... one screenshot means the entire game doesn't have it and that the video showing the game running with ambient occlusion doesn't exist :rofls:..... 

 

 

 

Base X1 Still drops and tears... can't spin that... owned:fella:

 

 

 

One screenshot.... one frame with tearing... :shrug: 

 

 

Tom did a bad job... that's a fact. :yeshrug: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, bhytre said:

lmao arguing about some old ass arcadey shooter the world has forgotten about... a fucking 2014 game. SHEEP  :kaz:

You'd think they'd make all this noise for maybe a GTAV port at last, but no, Sniper Elite 3 !!! :kaz: :kaz: :kaz:

:rofls: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Remij_ said:

One screenshot.... one frame with tearing... :shrug: 

 

 

Tom did a bad job... that's a fact. :yeshrug: 

*Goes into Remij mode*   

 

better textures in two screenshots must mean the Switch has better textures throughout right?  Since you know a screenshot represents the entire game :trump2:.... lol

 

 

Screenshot_20191013-152124_YouTube.jpg

Screenshot_20191013-152044_YouTube.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...