Jump to content

Forbes: Estimates Indicate Xbox Series X/S May Be Selling Nearly As Well As PS5 (Up: Cows falsely claimed MS released sales figures for Xbox, get curb-stopped when they find out they didn’t)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Apparently series X/s are around 13-14 million and PS5 is 15-17    https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2022/01/11/estimates-indicate-xbox-series-xs-may-be-selling-nearly-as-well-as-ps5/?s

Xbox is now at 12 million shipped as of end of Dec .... Which is less than what PS5 was in September.....    Yet Ghostz thinks Xbox is catching up 

Date of interview - Jan. 10, 2022   Ghostz on Jan 11, 2022 - Xbox just sold 2 million more in a day   

1 minute ago, ghostz said:

Phil has not announced any numbers. You wanna get in on the sig bet too? :smugcena:

except you attempted to insinuate numbers.

 

here..............here's actual proof of you doing just that:

 

19 hours ago, ghostz said:

The earlier reports indicated about a 5.5 million lead, now it’s down to as low as possibly 1.5 million. 

so why are you saying gouko can't do the same exact thing (except for the fact that he has MUCH BETTER sources than you)??????????

 

see...............you've already lost this argument by being a complete hypocrite.

 

the moment gouko showed you a source..............you started trying to dismiss all numbers, altogether.

 

that's the sign of somebody losing an argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jehurey said:

except you attempted to insinuate numbers.

 

here..............here's actual proof of you doing just that:

 

so why are you saying gouko can't do the same exact thing (except for the fact that he has MUCH BETTER sources than you)??????????

 

see...............you've already lost this argument by being a complete hypocrite.

 

the moment gouko showed you a source..............you started trying to dismiss all numbers, altogether.

 

that's the sign of somebody losing an argument.

Because Gouk said Phil said it. 
 

he didn’t. 
 

hence he lost the bet, and you’re about to too. :reg:

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

actually, in the post where gouko gave those numbers, he didn't mention phil's name anywhere within that post.

 

14 hours ago, Goukosan said:

 

Phil said it a few days ago and you think Xbox sold an additional 2 million in a few days since he said it? :drake:


 

so, what did Phil “say”? 
 

i think you should join the sig bet, too. :smugcena:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ghostz said:

 


 

so, what did Phil “say”? 
 

nope, his first post with the numbers don't mention phil.

 

he links the article

 

it really looks like you're trying to get out of this based on a technicality.

 

that's not going to work.:tom:

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Then he'd have to settle for.................you being wrong and losing the argument.

 

Yeah, I'm sure he's okay with that.:reg:


if @Goukosan wants to admit Phil never said that, I’m totally fine with it. Because he never did, LOL. Glad you agree with me. 

Edited by ghostz
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ghostz said:


when says

he doesn't have to say anything because he already posted the article and its link from the very beginning.

 

and that is what already made you lose the argument.

 

So.......you're RUNNING AWAY from that link you posted, and trying to make the argument about his second post.

 

Yeah, that's not gonna work.

 

So, do you have a response to the ARTICLE that he LINKED?

 

Yes or No?

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jehurey said:

he doesn't have to say anything because he already posted the article and its link from the very beginning.

 

and that is what already made you lose the argument.

 

So.......you're RUNNING AWAY from that link you posted, and trying to make the argument about his second post.

 

Yeah, that's not gonna work.

 

So, do you have a response to the ARTICLE that he LINKED?

 

Yes or No?

I’ll let him explain what he meant by “Phil said that”, I don’t think he needs you yo DC for him. 
 

@Goukosan, waiting. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ghostz said:

I’ll let him explain

No, he already showed the article and the link.

 

So basically you are saying that you don't have a response to that?

 

And therefore have lost the argument.


Good. Looks like gouko already accomplished what he set out to do.

 

Thanks for admitting.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ghostz said:

@Goukosan I’m waiting. :banderoos:

For what, you to lose again?

 

He'll be coming into this thread to see you plainly admitting that you don't have a response to the article that he linked.

 

That you actually ran away from that.:banderoos:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...