-
Content Count
35,884 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
47
Content Type
Calendar
Profiles
Forums
Everything posted by Goukosan
-
LemiJ - "If you ignore all the bootlicking threads/posts I've made hyping and or defending Xbox you would see I don't care about Xbox " ππ€£
-
You're still pretending not to care about Xbox? You're not fooling anyone. Both PS4 and PS5 put out better looking games than anything on Series X and One X ππ€£ππ€£
-
Series X and One X have as many ganes listed as the powerful Switch. Most powerful systems EVER!!!! and ZERO games to show for it ππ€£ππ€£
-
Two PS5 games Zero Series X games One PS4 game Zero One X games LemiJ ππ€£
-
Cyberpunk sub 80 MC/OC watch thread. UPDATE: OC GOAL ACHIEVED THHBK
Goukosan replied to Voidler's topic in System Wars
ππ€£ -
You waved the white flag pretty quickly with your DQXI argument ππ€£
-
Specific to DQXI clown π€‘.
-
Try to keep up chump.
-
We're talking about scenarios specifically to DQXI. You said all that and yet still if you bought Vanilla DQXI on PS4 you cannot upgrade and have to purchase the game again to play DQXIS ππ€£
-
Same thing what happens with most games genius. If you're buying it years after intial release you pay less than people that bought it at launch.
-
Aza of course with misinformation. DQXIS launched on Switch at 49.99 DQXI launched on PS4 at 59.99 DQXIs included tons of improvements of over the vanilla version. Instead of releasing the update as DLC on PS4, Square released another seperate version of the game on PS4. DQXI owners who paid $59.99 on PS4 cannot upgrade to DQXIS.... instead you have to purchase the game again if you want DQXIs at $39.99. Any DQXI owner on PS4 who upgraded to the S version basically paid 100 dollars. Where as on Switch you paid 50 from
-
Imagine,it took Trump losing and the Republicans infighting for him to finally say something good. He is trying to make Mitch look bad because he turned on him...lol. Doesn't matter, hopefully it gets upped to 2K. Republicans vs Republicans... eating each other alive.... everyone wins when Republicans lose
-
They broke up essential workers into two categories, not every single category of essential workers are getting it first. The first set of essential workers (Healthcare workers) already started getting it.... so im not sure what your argument is. Next up is the elderly. Then the second set of essential workers (construction, grocery workers etc) will be group number 3. So what actually is your argument?
-
Cooke you can scream until the cows come home. doesn't change that the panel of infectious disease experts have already decided that essential workers get it first, then elderly gets it, then another set of essential workers and then regular people. Nothing really to argue. I mean unless you think you're more of an expert than the actual experts ππ€£
-
No Cooke the entire point is to contain the spread to prevent EVERYONE from potentially dying. Older people is on a higher priority than regular non elderly people.... but in a pandemic the essential workers get it first because they're most at risk for catching it and spreading it to even more people which would lead to even more deaths.