Goukosan

Watch a movie, TV show, read, go out drinking, party, go on a date, out door activities, Indoor activities , sleep, work, work out... etc just to name a few.

I probably get in 5 to 10 depending on the week. On rare occasions I would get slightly more....but that's rare.. very rare.

20 hrs gaming a week? damn bro...

im updating the thread title with the correct info.

You forgot to mention that's this is the UK only stats.

Sounds like it does the seamless inter-planetary travel very well. You also don't need those silly toys to play the game.

Rare developed Golden Eye for Nintendo, Rare never owned the N64 version of the game. Perfect Dark was an ip that Rare created and was one of the IPs MS acquired when they bought rare.

Yes Activision made Golden eye games..... but they could not remaster the N64 game because Nintendo owned that version of the game. Tell me which platform holder bypasses their own copyright and allow another company to release games on a competitors platform?

That Back Peddle..... you're not slick. What happened to your March 2019 release date?

BbbbBut Teh conspiracy is more believable than the actual copyright for the videogame.

Lmfao.... lets see... you're quoting 3rd party sources that had nothing to do with the deal. Im quoting the guy at Microsoft who actually brokered the deal and would know the specifics.... He plainly states what happened and how much percentage Nintendo owned. Ed Fries, the architect of Microsoft Game Studios and the broker of the Rare acquisition - "They were 50 per cent owned by Nintendo and Nintendo had an option to acquire the other half of the company by a certain date. If they didn't exercise that option then Rare had the option to find a buyer for N

The article I linked (euro gamer) with direct quotes from Microsoft, says 50%. Im not arguing anymore with you, when I have EXACT DIRECT QUOTES from Ed Fries. Ed Fries, the architect of Microsoft Game Studios and the broker of the Rare acquisition - "They were 50 per cent owned by Nintendo " https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-02-08-who-killed-rare Carry on bro.

It was a funny story tired to all this Rare talk... lol I said they owned a 51% stake in Rare.... I was off by 1%. They owned half of the company. Had an option to purchase the other half and declined. Ed Fries, the architect of Microsoft Game Studios and the broker of the Rare acquisition - "They were 50 per cent owned by Nintendo and Nintendo had an option to acquire the other half of the company by a certain date. If they didn't exercise that option then Rare had the option to find a buyer for Nintendo's half. Nintendo had already extended the optio

When MS bought Rare they thought they got the Donkey Kong IP too According to Chris Seavor, former Rare employee and the director behind Conker's Bad Fur Day, Microsoft executives also thought they'd picked up Donkey Kong as well, since the developer had made classic titles such as Donkey Kong Country and Donkey Kong 64. Speaking on Twitter, Seavor said a few of the top-brass at Microsoft came for a tour around the studios and upon seeing Donkey Kong posters proceeded to get excited about owning the franchise - until Rare corrected them

Nintendo previously owned a 51% stake in Rare before selling it to MS for a ridiculous sum Anyway... you can deny the facts of the copyrights that I showed you....and believe the conspiracy that Nintendo was able to block a third party game from other platforms that they have no control over without Nintendo actually owning the rights to said version.

you are confusing rights to the IP, with rights to publish the a remake/remaster of the N64 game (Nintendo owned that rights to the N64 game up until Dec 2017) Rare employees who had copies of it when they were purchased by MS could not legally release it publicly... that's why the remake never happened. It wasn't a conspiracy

No.... You are confused. With the sale if Rare to MS... Rare was allowed to keep their IPs as this was their value and the reason Nintendo was allowed to get a great price for their share of Rare with the purchase by Microsoft. Nintendo kept all their own IPs and any code related to those IPs. With the IPs that Rare kept in the sale, they obviously are allowed to release those games because they own that IP. With Golden Eye N64, Nintendo owned the rights to the video game source up until Dec 2017.....It says it right there... yet you deny the

That's not how it works in IP law with code They owned the Name of the N64 version, the code itself (video game) and the cartridge. On the very next line under description. GOLDENEYE 007 (N64 VERSION), VIDEO GAME, CARTRIDGE Bbut teh conspiracy

Do you know what's on the cartridge?

Seriously? Videogames are that serious to you. Nintendo didn't own the rights to Goldeneye IP as it is a James Bond IP..... . but they do/did own the source code to the N64 game up until recently....Dec 10th 2017 to be exact. Now why would they let a competitor release it when they the owned the source? Nintendo filed for their copyright before the game’s release on August 25th 1997, however according to this copyrights record, its effective date began on December 10, 1997, which was exactly 20 years ago as of yesterday, meaning Nintendo no longer

bbbut you depend too much on Graphic experts

Didn't say Quantum looks bad, im saying GOW and Horizon looks better