jehurey

He used a homosexual slur that cooke himself has enforced.

No, I posted actual sources. You posted a piece of marketing material that doesn't even make sense.........and you just tried to deny the effectiveness of a piece of viral video that became quite a hit about 12 years ago, and received many compliments.

Yeah. Dynocrap's entire account needs to be wiped out. Everything. Every single post he's made. And he should be IP banned. No surprise coming from a repeat-offender when it comes to right-wing bigotry and racism.

Which isn't as good as actual binocular vision in real space. At this end of the day you are at the mercy of GRAPHICAL effects produced on those STILL 2-dimension displays to help sell the illusion. Those same things help sell the illusion on monocular displays: Dude.........I'm posting from encyclopedia sources, and you're posting MARKETING material.

Through a stereoscopic illusion. THink about this............you CANNOT be able to tell the difference in perspective without changes to: -geometry -lighting -shading THE SAME graphical effects that are created on a single panel. This is not up for debate. VR is a visual illusion.........one of the OLDEST forms of illusions. The believably is due to the MOVEMENT, accomplished through the accelerometers and motion sensors. Of which I just proved can be done outside of stereoscopic displays.

So. is. V R are you just not........getting it? Its one form of illusion.............and its not even remotely new. Yes there is immersion, and there's of comments that prove it. You don't have credibility on the subject, and especially now........you appear to be LOSING credibility the more you try to deny it. THanks for not really being able to put up any real counterargument. 

Yes there is. That video was a big hit when it came out. You're not going to convince people otherwise. You JUST ATTEMPTED THAT TANGENT, yet again with your "there's no immersion in that video" remark. So you just proved my point. Who am I going to believe, you or Johnny Chung Lee who ended up working with Microsoft and Google after that video? lol

Which gives the illusion of depth and space. Dude, a face hugger flying at you in Half Life 2 back in 2004 made your head move back.

No, its definitely not called that. https://www.britannica.com/science/human-eye/The-perception-of-depth So, basically what that means is: -Realism -Accurate proportions of objects (related to realism) -Movement speed based on distance (racing games in which the asphalt closest to you is moving much faster than the textures of asphalt from far away) -Lighting -Shading This boils down the graphics in games.

No, I'm talking about both things. You're the one that tried to dismiss the Johnny Chung Lee example........you were making "this immersion is better than that immersion" type of argument. So I simply went alot and followed you on that tangent. The main accomplishment of VR isn't the stereoscopic effect...........its the tracking of your eyes/head.

So are two flat screens that are two inches from your face. At the end, its your eyes that perform the "magic trick". Same would apply with 3D software-based graphics.

A couple of months ago, when I was channel surfing, I watched the first few minutes of Open Range, a 2003 movie starring Robert Duvall and Kevin Costner. And the imagery felt so beautiful and just, like, it felt like something I needed to see that was different from all the other dark and gritty movies. So I have it on DVR and finally watched it. What a beautiful movie. Like a great palette cleanser. Just beautiful imagery that is meant to represent Montana in 1882 (I think it was filmed in Alberta) And both Duvall and Costner go to great lengths to convey r

They're trying to boast about incredibly silly things. People do not like having to wear things in order to enjoy a visual effect. They'll prefer their eyes and faces to be completely free of any burdens.

No, its immersive, that youtube video was quite a big hit when it came out. If the window genuinely behaves like a window, then the gimmick is a success. In a VR helmet makes your eyes tired or causes people to feel claustrophobic.........then the immersion isn't holding up. Your brain is used to having plenty of space in front of your eyeballs and not having something covering up your eyes. Your brain DOES NOTICE that it has LED screens 2 inches from your eyeballs...........there is nothing you can say that will convince anybody otherwise. Even

Dynocrap explicitly is saying that with his "2D gamers" comments. Like the Johnny Chung Lee video points out, the graphics on a screen that is static to the position of your eyes makes the imagery appear "flat" When it adjusts the in-game camera with your eye's position, the gimmick is rather immersive. Sensors that track your eyes and your movement is the "magic trick" that makes VR work. Except you just decided to omit the final part of my last post: The "looking into a window into another world" genuinely DOES FEEL like "looking in

Except we've had other 3D image devices before. The accomplishment isn't with the screens............in fact the screens achieving stereoscopic 3D are the OLDEST gimmick being implemented. That's a term that's existed since the 50's. Modern VR is derived by the accomplishment of accelerometers and sensors. Yes the video I posted ABSOLUTELY has to do with immersion, the person specifically says that. The screen is irrelevant because the screen could be different, it could be an ultra-wide monitor that gives you a wider view of the world, if the sensors are p

The images don't give you perceived depth. THe proximity of the images to your eyes provide that immersion. At the end of the day.......the trick doesn't work unless people have two working eyeballs. If anything the accelerometers and sensors are the real accomplishment in achieving the immersion. We've known this for quite some time:

check the poster's IP address and compare it with sheepkilla's he magically found a person who hasn't even posted yet?

i'm apparently fueled by the bitch pheromones being released remotely. like so.

No, it does. I think you don't want to answer because it debunks your attempt to sound clever. If you could embarrass me by answering it, you would've done it by now.

so, are you going to answer the question I just asked? or run away from it?

Wait...........so your VR device isn't displaying images on a screen that is flat? Its using some sort of actual 3D physical image display?

Bill Gates officially stepped down from Microsoft's board just this past March. He has no official position within the corporation. There's nothing there for lemmings to take credit for. If anything, Bill Gates dumped the dead weight so that he can focus on something more productive. He can save us from a once-in-a-century pandemic..............because those odds are better than him trying to save the utter failure that was Xbox gaming.

No, you don't have facts on your side. I mean............you're clearly ignorant, and you don't have any evidence to back up your worldview.

Watched HBO's new movie, Bad Education, starring Hugh Jackman and Alison Janney. Pretty good. Its like a flashy crime movie about people getting away with stuff, and then it all crumbling down on them. But they're not mobsters or anything like that.