Jump to content

North Korea regime needs to end


Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, notzwarrior said:

Coincidentally (didn't make this thread knowing of this), the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo ended his trip to NK, meeting with Kim Jong-un yesterday and a couple news are coming out detailing the results, such as no more missile testing from NK, and no military exercises with South Korea from US's side. As far as denuclearization, NK has asked for a negotiation, supposedly for the US to dismantle a couple of their own nuclear plants?  There is also talk of ending UN sanctions, or dismantling any talk of a Korean war. 

Pompeo is the current head of the CIA. What do you exoect him to say exactly.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I'll get right on it.

This whole sentence is a grammatical holocaust stop bragging about your intelligence lmao 

Well Mexico is totally irrelevant aside from the problems they bring here, and 90% of Canada's population is hugging the US border. So yeah, the United States is the only relevance in North America. 

On 2018-10-06 at 11:21 AM, DynamiteCop! said:

Well Mexico is totally irrelevant aside from the problems they bring here, and 90% of Canada's population is hugging the US border. So yeah, the United States is the only relevance in North America. 

You do realize most of the towns and cities were founded before the borders were final right?

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

That would explain something if not for the fact that over the course of the last 150 years nothing has changed.

Yeah except for the towns and cities getting bigger. Show me where new towns are being made anywhere. It doesn't really happen anymore, there's no need for it. Exploration and imperial colonies are done with. We were all British subjects you tit. The border was drawn after the towns were there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Cookester15 said:

Yeah except for the towns and cities getting bigger. Show me where new towns are being made anywhere. It doesn't really happen anymore, there's no need for it. Exploration and imperial colonies are done with. We were all British subjects you tit. The border was drawn after the towns were there. 

Not Quebec. Free Quebec, you cant hold the French hostage. And Canada still is technically a british colony

Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, notzwarrior said:

I did. For as long as the Queen of England is also you're queen. you are technically a british colony

 

Be a Canadian and apologize now

1. The Queen of Canada and the Queen of England are two different positions without any inherent subservience. Canada has its own separate monarchy.

 

2. It's entirely irrelevant because the power is with the PM and the office of the Queen of Canada is bound by convention to put the royal seal at the bidding of the PM.

 

Canada is not, via any technicality, a British colony. I'm sorry that you're wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...