Playstation Tablet 1,884 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Link to post Share on other sites
Playstation Tablet 1,884 Posted July 29, 2019 Author Share Posted July 29, 2019 Switch: - Switch: Docked: Dynamic resolution is less aggressive. Comes to 720p very often with lows of 680p and lower observed. - Switch: Portable: Mostly sticks at 540p range, DF didn't observe anything as low as 360p in their testing. - Most effects are still there, volumetric lighting is low quality and jittery. - AO has been eliminated/missing. - Shadow quality and coverage is reduced. - Textures are much lower resolution and blurrier. - SSR missing as well. - Lacks soft lighting of the other console versions. - DF comment it looks better in handheld because of the smaller screen. - "It looks lower resolution than what the actual pixel count shows" - John - Capped at 30 FPS but doesn't hold in most combat sequences. - Average 25~ FPS in most firefights. Frame Pace spikes also occur in heavy scenarios - Playable but lacks perfect fluidity. - "Switch is a little bit sharper (compared to Wolf 2) but it does run pretty poorly, almost always under 30 FPS" Overall DF comment it's kinda improved since Wolf 2. Xbox: - Xbox X: Still retains the 3 dynamic resolution options (on/off/aggressive) - Just with Dynamic res on (and not aggressive), frequent drops to 1440p seen. - Even With aggressive dynamic resolution, frame rate drops still observed. With just Dynamic on, frame rate dips in 50~60 range. - Native 4K mode averages around 40 FPS in DF's testing with more aggressive drops in later areas in the game. - Overall DF commented, it does not seem as consistent as Wolfenstein 2 - "At it's worse, light years beyond Switch but feels inconsistent overall". - DF thinks it's not as refined as Wolf 2. - DF did not get time to look at the XBOne/S version in time for the video. Not sure if it will be touched upon later. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 I think its telling that Digital Foundry went out of their way to analyze the game on PS4/PS4pro first, and then Switch/XBX afterwards, and they don't even care to analyze the game on the other Xbox systems. Link to post Share on other sites
ScaryMovies 29 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 1 hour ago, jehurey said: I think its telling that Digital Foundry went out of their way to analyze the game on PS4/PS4pro first, and then Switch/XBX afterwards, and they don't even care to analyze the game on the other Xbox systems. Does the PS4 Pro version run better than the One X version? If so, that would be pretty weird. Link to post Share on other sites
102020393023445948594 2,223 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 damn, runs and looks better on switch. embarrassing for Done X. I guess developers have just given up due to the phenomenally low sales of Xbone/ Boner X systems. shame. Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,460 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 3 hours ago, ScaryMovies said: Does the PS4 Pro version run better than the One X version? If so, that would be pretty weird. That has been a trend this year. Link to post Share on other sites
ScaryMovies 29 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Just now, Goukosan said: That has been a trend this year. That’s weird tho, there’s no doubt the One X is the more capable console. Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,460 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 3 minutes ago, ScaryMovies said: That’s weird tho, there’s no doubt the One X is the more capable console. Yes more capable... but not more financially viable. Developers go where the money is. Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 3,043 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 13 minutes ago, ScaryMovies said: That’s weird tho, there’s no doubt the One X is the more capable console. Well it's not really true . There have been a few games that perform better on pro , at a much lower resolution . For the most part , X wins . You'll only see DF threads about games that sont wins. Link to post Share on other sites
bhytre 2,815 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Imagine playing this Swedecuck trash on a handheld 1 Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 3,043 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 19 minutes ago, Goukosan said: Yes more capable... but not more financially viable. Developers go where the money is. All they do is drop the resolution more on pro . They could do the same on xbox but I bet MS has a say in that . Dropping resolution isn't putting in extra work . It has nothing to do with financials This game isn't locked 60 on either console , but it is much higher resolution on xbox . Link to post Share on other sites
lostfool 694 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 X is a mistake. MS sucks. Lemmings suck Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,484 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Yikes. The Switch version looks pretty horrible. Link to post Share on other sites
102020393023445948594 2,223 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 and yeah this game looks gay as hell ROFF Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now