Let's talk about those scheming monopolizing Corporations

[The Mother Fucker 26]

Just now, jehurey said:

I'm now teetering on being mad?

 

When did i claim that I was being sarcastic?

 

Dude, do you need a dictionary or something? Or maybe a thesaurus? (see, that's condescending)

Did I say you said you were being sarcastic.  I said you will try to claim it as you deny the other two points that I said you were.  

 

and YES you were being condescending and you being it right now again. 

[jehurey 3,231]

3 minutes ago, The Mother Fucker said:

Did I say you said you were being sarcastic.  I said you will try to claim it as you deny the other two points that I said you were.  

 

and YES you were being condescending and you being it right now again. 

Is there supposed to be a dispute as to whether I was being condescending?

 

Because I seem to be agreeing with you.

 

 Why would I need to switch over to claiming sarcasm? That would imply that I don't actually think you've embarrassed yourself in this thread.

 

....and...why would I do that?

[The Mother Fucker 26]

7 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Is there supposed to be a dispute as to whether I was being condescending?

 

Because I seem to be agreeing with you.

 

 Why would I need to switch over to claiming sarcasm? That would imply that I don't actually think you've embarrassed yourself in this thread.

 

....and...why would I do that?

The two aren't mutually exclusive, you been mad since I challenged your view on Cooke's thread on Tulsi and not willing to be bested you came here to this thread to try to pick apart how created the poll question from the thread subject.  
& so you then proceeded to act condescending after I called you out on your wrong assumption that I was saying all the media brands in the polls were monopolies.  

 

and we been back and fourth since.   Is that enough recap for you, or are you still mad that you have another condescending reply to make?   

Edited September 24, 2019 by The Mother Fucker

[jehurey 3,231]

5 minutes ago, The Mother Fucker said:

The two aren't mutually exclusive, you been mad since I challenged your view on Cooke's thread on Tulsi and not willing to be bested you came here to this thread to try to pick apart how created the poll question from the thread subject.  
& so you then proceeded to act condescending after I called you out on your wrong assumption that I was saying all the media brands in the polls were monopolies.  

 

and we been back and fourth since.   Is that enough recap for you, or are you still mad that you have another condescending reply to make?   

My assumption wasn't wrong.

 

I did accurately point out the discrepency.

 

Its very simple.......look at how I'm typing. And look at what you're typing.

 

You're not going to live it down. The funny part is how you made yourself mad while I was just repeating the same 3 things since the beginning. lol

[The Mother Fucker 26]

3 minutes ago, jehurey said:

My assumption wasn't wrong.

 

I did accurately point out the discrepency.

 

Its very simple.......look at how I'm typing. And look at what you're typing.

 

You're not going to live it down. The funny part is how you made yourself mad while I was just repeating the same 3 things since the beginning. lol

and What am I trying to live down?

 

You are the one who made the assumption that every choice in the poll is a monopoly not me.  It is not even implied that either which is funny.   That was your assumption.  

Edited September 24, 2019 by The Mother Fucker

[jehurey 3,231]

6 minutes ago, The Mother Fucker said:

and What am I trying to live down?

 

You are the one who made the assumption that every choice in the poll is a monopoly not me.  It is not even implied that either which is funny.   That was your assumption.  

No, I said you listed companies that weren't monopolies, the assumption being you don't know enough about those corporations, or you don't know the definition of what a monopoly is.

 

Believe me............the resulting implication is that you sound dumb, and that's funny.

 

I shouldn't have to explain this, its not rocket science. lol

[The Mother Fucker 26]

Just now, jehurey said:

No, I said you listed companies that weren't monopolies, the assumption being you don't know enough about those corporations, or you don't know the definition of what a monopoly is.

 

Believe me............the resulting implication is that you sound dumb, and that's funny.

 

I shouldn't have to explain this, its not rocket science. lol

or I was simply adding those in their to skew the results.  

You are making more assumptions to think I don't know any about these companies, or that I don't know what a monopoly is.  

Instead of putting your foot in your mouth.    You could have just asked, "hey why did you include these brands that aren't monopolies?"

 

  

[jehurey 3,231]

1 minute ago, The Mother Fucker said:

or I was simply adding those in their to skew the results.  

 

  

Oh, so now you're adding in a THIRD explanation?????

[The Mother Fucker 26]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Oh, so now you're adding in a THIRD explanation?????

Well, I have to explain things to you like you are a third grader for you to understand.  

[jehurey 3,231]

1 minute ago, The Mother Fucker said:

Well, I have to explain things to you like you are a third grader for you to understand.  

Nah, my explanation was much more logical and simpler.

 

You're just dumb, that's all.

[The Mother Fucker 26]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Nah, my explanation was much more logical and simpler.

 

You're just dumb, that's all.

 

No you made a poor assumption, because you are dumb, and you think too highly of yourself to see it.   

Edited September 24, 2019 by The Mother Fucker

[The Mother Fucker 26]

All the companies listed in the poll are media companies.  

All companies can be perceived scheming, and some of them i.e. Disney, Comcast, literally are monopolies. 

 

 

 

Edited September 24, 2019 by The Mother Fucker

[jehurey 3,231]

4 minutes ago, The Mother Fucker said:

 

No you made a poor assumption, because you are dumb, and you think too highly of yourself to see it.   

No, I made a logical one.

 

So, to recap:

-We're supposed to know that your thread title is about one subject

-But the contents within your OP contains another subject

-And you may have intentionally thrown in OTHER stuff to intentionally "skew" the subject

 

Nah.........I think I'll stick with mines, which just concludes that you didn't know what you were talking about, and got angry when I pointed that out.

 

I mean........if you WEREN'T angry, then you wouldn't do something as obvious as spending the remaining 80% of the thread trying to get back at me over that simple comment. LOL Right? Who would do such a thing?

Edited September 24, 2019 by jehurey

[The Mother Fucker 26]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

No, I made a logical one.

 

So, to recap:

-We're supposed to know that your thread title is about one subject

-But the contents within your OP contains another subject

-And you may have intentionally thrown in OTHER stuff to intentionally "skew" the subject

 

Nah.........I think I'll stick with mines, which just concludes that you didn't know what you were talking about, and got angry when I pointed that out.

 

I mean........if you WEREN'T angry, then you wouldn't do something as obvious as spending the remaining 80% of the thread trying to get back at me over that simple comment. LOL Right? Who would do such a thing?

 

YOU!

[jehurey 3,231]

Just now, The Mother Fucker said:

 

YOU!

LOL. You're clearly not the angry one

 

What am I trying to get back at you? I already succeeded in making fun of you from the very first post?  I don't need anything else. lol

[The Mother Fucker 26]

5 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, I made a logical one.

 

So, to recap:

-We're supposed to know that your thread title is about one subject

-But the contents within your OP contains another subject

-And you may have intentionally thrown in OTHER stuff to intentionally "skew" the subject

 

Nah.........I think I'll stick with mines, which just concludes that you didn't know what you were talking about, and got angry when I pointed that out.

 

I mean........if you WEREN'T angry, then you wouldn't do something as obvious as spending the remaining 80% of the thread trying to get back at me over that simple comment. LOL Right? Who would do such a thing?

 

YOU!

[jehurey 3,231]

3 minutes ago, The Mother Fucker said:

 

YOU!

And then I said:

 

6 minutes ago, jehurey said:

LOL. You're clearly not the angry one

 

What am I trying to get back at you? I already succeeded in making fun of you from the very first post?  I don't need anything else. lol

If you need me to replace a fuse and reboot your system, let me know.

[The Mother Fucker 26]

no, I got you to describe yourself.  Case is closed. 

 

12 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, I made a logical one.

 

So, to recap:

-We're supposed to know that your thread title is about one subject

-But the contents within your OP contains another subject

-And you may have intentionally thrown in OTHER stuff to intentionally "skew" the subject

 

Nah.........I think I'll stick with mines, which just concludes that you didn't know what you were talking about, and got angry when I pointed that out.

 

I mean........if you WEREN'T angry, then you wouldn't do something as obvious as spending the remaining 80% of the thread trying to get back at me over that simple comment. LOL Right? Who would do such a thing?

 

YOU!

[jehurey 3,231]

Just now, The Mother Fucker said:

no, I got you to describe yourself.  Case is closed. 

 

 

YOU!

No, you really didn't.

 

I'm not the one who lost their marbles because of a comment.

 

Like I said, look at what I'm typing.........and look at what you're typing.

 

Hope this was a learning lesson for you.

[The Mother Fucker 26]

12 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, I made a logical one.

 

So, to recap:

-We're supposed to know that your thread title is about one subject

-But the contents within your OP contains another subject

-And you may have intentionally thrown in OTHER stuff to intentionally "skew" the subject

 

Nah.........I think I'll stick with mines, which just concludes that you didn't know what you were talking about, and got angry when I pointed that out.

 

I mean........if you WEREN'T angry, then you wouldn't do something as obvious as spending the remaining 80% of the thread trying to get back at me over that simple comment. LOL Right? Who would do such a thing?

 

YOU!