Jump to content

Digital Foundry: God of War Ragnarok on PS5 is like a maxed out PC Port with flawless performance!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 463
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

A 16 page thread of lemshits having all kinds of meltdowns all becuase DF said that God of War Ragnarok looks and runs well on PS5       One of my most successful threads ever.

Sony Santa Monica are unstoppable gods. I can’t wait to pop this into my PS5 next week. I can’t imagine playing this masterpiece on a PS4 lol. I feel bad for anyone without a PS5 right now especially

This thread lol

Posted Images

Just now, Substatic said:

 

You're reading RTINGs wrong. The 177~ is the correct figure,

No.

 

Unless you want that 8.9 score to go away, as well

 

:lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl:

 

Oh man, he's just about really to completely collapse, he's now working to discredit RTINGS:tom:

 

Hall.

of

Fame.

this.

thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Substatic said:

 

What the fuck?  @jehurey can you post your pc gaming setup this can't be real.

 

You're roasting my PC gaming setup for having the tied for first place PC gaming display, while you're using a 1080P for PC gaming? Fucking A. :rawf: I refuse to believe he's THAT much of a joke.

 

 

 

 

Jerry link your PC gaming setup. There is no way you're sitting here telling me my PC gaming 8.9 Monitor and my PC gaming speakers are a bad thing without linking your own PC gaming setup.

 

I call foul on this behavior. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Substatic said:

 

This is SDR brightness you fucking retard. :omglol:

 

Because that monitor DISABLES HDR brightness when using it as a PC monitor.

 

LOL you actually thought you could slip by that one.

 

You already admitted that you play this at 230 nits.

 

Console gamers play their PS5 on their OLED at the full HDR brightness settings.

 

Which is DEACTIVATED FOR YOU..............because you use it as a PC monitor:tom:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Substatic said:

 

 

Jerry link your PC gaming setup. There is no way you're sitting here telling me my PC gaming 8.9 Monitor and my PC gaming speakers are a bad thing without linking your own PC gaming setup.

 

Nope, you're not changing the subject.

 

You're not getting out of this.

 

Speaking of which.

 

MV1Wvzw.jpeg

 

This doesn't look like a 42 inch monitor.

 

The dimensions for the LG 42 C2 is that its 36 inches wide.

 

The average chair width, like the chair in your photo, is about 21-23 inches wide.


The monitor's width doesn't look much wider than the chair's width.

 

That looks like a 32 inch monitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

YES.

 

It's 177~ at RTINGS and 179~ at Hardward Unboxed.

 

Fucking caught lying!

No, its 133 nits brightness when you are using it as a PC monitor

 

This has already been explained to you.

 

So now you are saying that RTINGS did NOT "get it wrong"

 

LOL backtracking

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, -GD-X said:

This thread lol

 

Yup. Two years ago Jerry called me out for not having a 3080 then I posted it and he goal post moved to oblivion.

 

Jerry says I don't have a good monitor, but it turns out I have the best. Then he goal post moves to oblivion.

 


Rinse and repeat. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Substatic said:

 

Yup. Two years ago Jerry called me out for not having a 3080 then I posted it and he goal post moved to oblivion.

 

Jerry says I don't have a good monitor, but it turns out I have the best. Then he goal post moves to oblivion.

 


Rinse and repeat. 

No you don't

 

I caught you lying

 

And now your photo appears to be suspect

 

MV1Wvzw.jpeg

 

That does not appear to be an LG 42, because it would be 36 inches wide.

 

And that doesn't appear to be a 36 inch wide screen.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Substatic said:

 

You're literally reading it wrong

No.

 

It reads correctly

 

In PC mode the brightness goes down

 

Hp9TgPb.png

 

you're not getting out of this.

 

133 cd/m2 when in PC mode

 

which is what you have it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jehurey said:

No.

 

It reads correctly

 

In PC mode the brightness goes down

 

Hp9TgPb.png

 

you're not getting out of this.

 

133 cd/m2 when in PC mode

 

which is what you have it.

 

Oh my poor little Jerry.

 

Did you think I wouldn't see the paragraph you cut out on top of that image?

 

 

rekt22.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No you don't

 

I caught you lying

 

And now your photo appears to be suspect

 

MV1Wvzw.jpeg

 

That does not appear to be an LG 42, because it would be 36 inches wide.

 

And that doesn't appear to be a 36 inch wide screen.

 

Saved incase you edit this.

 

Dis' gunn' be good'.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jerry about to get FUCKING RAPED.  Now THIS is going to be hall of fame.

 

:rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf::rawf:

LOL he's going to prove that he plays on a 133 nits monitor

 

that's his BEST-case scenario:lawl:

 

No, its very simple

 

Here are the specs from LG's website

 

Y66RwlA.png

 

Does that look like its 36 inches wide?

 

Not diagonal.......but simply width.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

Oh my poor little Jerry.

 

Did you think I wouldn't see the paragraph you cut out on top of that image?

 

 

rekt22.png

oh my god

 

so you're saying that your peak brightness is actually 190 nits and not 230nits?

fxZ5kZb.png

 

:lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl::lawl:

 

@-GD-X Hall of Fame this thread...........he actually thought it was a good idea to correct me from this:

 

H7JDdeg.png

 

to this

 

pfV8Vh9.png

 

Now that's a genuine self-own........for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...