Digital Foundry: God of War Ragnarok on PS5 is like a maxed out PC Port with flawless performance!

[jehurey 3,298]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

Yup, and RTINGS also said

 

 

 

that PC peak brightness was a negative in four different sections of their review

 

 

 

 

 

you do know that its brightness, when reviewed completely on its own, also reviews poorly right?

 

[jehurey 3,298]

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

You're the one not getting out, rofl.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

why would I want to get out of winning this argument, and completely destroying you?

 

 

you still don't have a computer monitor that delivers the same display quality that many TV owners do.

 

That statement is 100% correct.

[Substatic 422]

1 hour ago, Substatic said:

 

What the fuck?  @jehurey can you post your pc gaming setup this can't be real.

 

You're roasting my PC gaming setup for having the tied for first place PC gaming display, while you're using a 1080P for PC gaming? Fucking A.  I refuse to believe he's THAT much of a joke.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer the question. Stop dodging for once. Everyone sees this post and they see you not responding.  You are being crucified.  Post your PC gaming desk setup within an hour.

Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic

[jehurey 3,298]

2 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

Real scene peak is not the same as sustained, you retard

you sustained peak brightness is even lower

 

its at 226 nits

[Substatic 422]

Just now, jehurey said:

why would I want to get out of winning this argument,

 

 

 

 

Easy Jerry. Showing this score is fake:

 

 

[Substatic 422]

Just now, jehurey said:

you sustained peak brightness is even lower

 

its at 226 nits

 

 

Sustained 100% window you dumb mother fucker. This is SDR. You just learned about displays this 1 hour lol.

[jehurey 3,298]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

 

Easy Jerry. Showing this score is fake:

 

 

it is, because its comparing monitors to other monitors.

 

and your claim was that you were gaming better than console gamer's television displays

 

So the review score doesn't apply.

 

Thank you for pointing out that the score IS INDEED FAKE

 

So we move onto basic, verifiable facts

 

230 nits is lower than 600-700 nits

 

Correct?

 

Can you imagine how bad you look if you run away from this simple question?

[Substatic 422]

Just now, jehurey said:

 

 

 you were gaming better than console gamer's television displays

 

 

I never said this.  Fucking making shit up Jerry. Gas lighting scumbag.

[jehurey 3,298]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

 

Sustained 100% window you dumb mother fucker.

then your monitor goes down to

 

 

 

Hall of Fame this thread.

[Substatic 422]

2 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

 

Easy Jerry. Showing this score is fake:

 

 

 

JERRY The review is still 8.9 for gaming and 8.9 for HDR.

[jehurey 3,298]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

I never said this. 

yes you did.

 

And now, since you are saying you never said this, you are basically saying that you AREN'T playing on a better display than console gamers.

 

Thanks for officially losing.

[Substatic 422]

3 minutes ago, jehurey said:

 

 

 

 

 

Hall of Fame this thread.

That's the wrong one. They should hall of fame this, for you lying in almost every post:

 

 

 

Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic

[Substatic 422]

Just now, jehurey said:

  you AREN'T playing on a better display than console gamers.

 

 

 

The same fucking display. Just a lot higher fps and settings in 99% of games. I never said I had a monitor better than all displays.

[jehurey 3,298]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

JERRY The review is

for the monitor compared to other monitor.

 

The argument is your gaming display versus console gamers display on their OLED television.

 

so, the arbritrary review score is irrelevant.

 

We now use basic facts

 

Is 230 nits more than 600-700 nits

 

Yes or No?

 

Can you imagine how bad you look if you don't answer this question, and attempt to run back to a completely made-up and arbitrary review score, again?

[Substatic 422]

3 hours ago, jehurey said:

 

 ....you still don't have a computer monitor that delivers the same display quality that many TV owners do.

 

 

 

Jerry why did you lie in your first post?

 

 

[jehurey 3,298]

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

That's the wrong one, they aren't hall of faming a lie,

 

 

 

he thought that was better.

 

But nope, its 133 because you run it in PC mode, or else you lose input lag.

 

Imagine

 

A hermit

 

Who claims to be a hermit

 

Intentionally turning off low input lag on their monitor

 

[jehurey 3,298]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

 

Jerry why did you lie in your first post?

 

 

I didn't

 

you don't game better than console gamers

 

you have a pathetic peak brightness of 230 nits

 

correct?

[Substatic 422]

Just now, jehurey said:

 

 

you don't game better than console gamers

 

 

 

First of all I do, because of higher settings and FPS.  Sustained 100% window is all that matters in SDR and that's the same on PC.

 

Secondly, That's not what you said,

 

 

Quote

....you still don't have a computer monitor that delivers the same display quality that many TV owners do.

 

 

Admit you got raped. Now.

[jehurey 3,298]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

First of all I do, because of higher settings and FPS.  Sustained 100% window is all that matters

No

 

Unless you play a game that has a frozen screen.

 

You don't have 100% white at all times, do you?

 

Wow................you really are stupid and don't know how they measure HDR do you?

 

That's why people like Vincent Teoh and RTINGs usually stick to 10% window.

 

And RTINGs uses something called "Real Scene" to determine average real world scenario

 

100% sustained is NOT A REAL WORLD SCENARIO

 

Hall of Fame this thread.

[Substatic 422]

5 minutes ago, jehurey said:

 

 

But nope, its 133 because you run it in PC mode, or else you lose input lag.

 

 

 

You're reading RTINGs wrong. The 177~ is the correct figure, confirmed by Hardware Unboxed who actually say it is ~179.

 

 

 

 

The ~133 is for:

 

Quote

Below are the results for the brightness tested with Game Optimizer setting disabled in PC Mode with the Picture Mode still on 'Game Optimizer'.

 

The 177~ is for regular PC mode with GO on (which is standard default)

Quote

These results are from after calibration in the 'Game Optimizer' Picture Mode with Game Optimizer enabled and the input set to 'PC', which lets you achieve low input lag and proper text clarity when using it as a PC monitor. 

 

 

 

Holy shit either you are lying or retarded. Which is it.

Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic