Digital Foundry: God of War Ragnarok on PS5 is like a maxed out PC Port with flawless performance!

[Substatic 422]

Just now, jehurey said:

 

 

holy shit, I have absolutely got you in checkmate

 

 

In what fucking planet is a 8.9 a check mate.

 

In what planet is a C2 42" not a great gaming monitor.

 

Meanwhile, t his fucking kid is still using a 1200p 60 hz monitor. 

 

[jehurey 3,299]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

And this clearly wasn't an issue. Hell I barely cared

 

 

your opinion isn't worth shit

 

i just caught you lying.

 

"no difference to me"

 

 

RTINGS says its "disappointing"

 

In other words.........................your opinion is worth jack shit

 

But I already knew that to begin with.

 

Of course you didn't notice any difference...........previous PC LCD monitors have shit to non-existant HDR settings as well.

[jehurey 3,299]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

 

In what fucking planet is a 8.9 a check mate.

 

 

when they say this:

 

"disappointing peak brightness"

 

and they list 230 nits.

 

there no way around that.

 

Facts are Facts.

 

Console gamers play on their LG tv's at a higher brightness.

 

you're done.

[Substatic 422]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

 

 

RTINGS says its "disappointing"

 

 

They gave it an 8.9 for HDR and Gaming.

 

Get the fuck out of here. 

[jehurey 3,299]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

They

said its peak brightness "is disappointing"

 

and they listed 230 nits brightness

 

You're aren't getting around that.

 

Not if you attempt it 1000 times.................I will post this 1000 times.

 

You've lost.

 

Badly.

 

Like.............REALLY BADLY.

[Substatic 422]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

said its peak brightness "is disappointing"

 

Said it's an 8.9 for Gaming and HDR, and it got stellar reviews at HBU too.

 

In fact let me look up every monitor review for this thing and fuck you up even more with the final score.

 

 

Fuck off kid. 

 

 

Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic

[jehurey 3,299]

They only said that in "Media Creation" review

 

No, they said it in its top section "Mixed Usage"

 

 

They said it in the next section, OFFICE

 

 

They said it in Media Consumption section:

 

 

oh my god, he's getting absolutely slaughtered

[jehurey 3,299]

2 minutes ago, Substatic said:

Said it's an 8.9 for Gaming and HDR,

 

 

and they said it had disappointing peak brightness for HDR

 

and they said it had bad HDR in FOUR OF ITS SIX SECTIONS, including its overall top section.

 

 

230 nits

 

remember, you were saying you were playing BETTER than console game's and their displays

 

two-hundred and thirty nits, peak brightness

 

you're clearly not.

 

You're done.

 

And you know it.

[Substatic 422]

6 minutes ago, jehurey said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All of these scores are great. What am I looking for?

 

They even give HDR and Gaming 8.9 on top of those.

Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic

[jehurey 3,299]

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

 

 

All of these scores are great. What am I looking for?

 

 

230 nits bright in Gaming Optimizer mode

 

That's what you're looking for.

 

And that's where you lose the argument.

Correct?

[jehurey 3,299]

Does he really want me to bitchslap him all night long?

 

He's already lost.

 

What is he expecting?

 

How does he expect to get out of the fact that he games at 230 nits brightness?

[Substatic 422]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

230 nits bright in Gaming Optimizer mode

 

 

 

And it got an 8.9 in gaming....

Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic

[Substatic 422]

Just now, jehurey said:

How does he expect to get out of the fact that he games at 230 nits brightness?

 

It's clearly not that big of an issue if it still gets an 8.9. I didn't even notice any dimness coming from my last monitor.

[jehurey 3,299]

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

 

And it got an 8.9 in gaming....

 

compared to OTHER MONITORS

 

not compared to tvs

 

RTINGS even says that in their review

 

You said that you were gaming on a better display that CONSOLE OWNERS who game on TV

 

So

 

 

 

 

that RTINGS review score is out the window, completely irrelevant.

 

RTINGS describes the real-world facts of its brightness

 

What is the brightness again?

[jehurey 3,299]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

It's clearly not that big of an issue

Really then why did RTINGS list it as a negative multiple times?????????????

 

And call it "disappointing"

 

Sweetie.

 

You said you were gaming on a BETTER DISPLAY than console gamers.

 

Is 230 nits better than console gamers gaming on their LG OLEDs at around 600-700 nits?

 

yes or no?

 

How bad do you want to embarass yourself today? How bad do you look if you avoid answering that question?

[Substatic 422]

Just now, jehurey said:

Really then why did RTINGS list it as a negative multiple times?????????????

 

And call it "disappointing"

 

 

Clearly not a big deal, 

 

 

 

 

[Substatic 422]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

 

 

Is 230 nits better than console gamers gaming on their LG OLEDs at around 600-700 nits?

 

 

No one is gaming at 700 nits SDR Sustained Windows.  That would blow your eyes out your ass.

 

You're confusing real scene peak and sustained windows. I fucking knew you had no clue as to what you're talking about. 🤣

[jehurey 3,299]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

Clearly not a big deal, 

 

 

 

 

clearly it is:

 

 

 

 

 

[Substatic 422]

1 hour ago, Substatic said:

 

What the fuck?  @jehurey can you post your pc gaming setup this can't be real.

 

You're roasting my PC gaming setup for having the tied for first place PC gaming display, while you're using a 1080P for PC gaming? Fucking A.  I refuse to believe he's THAT much of a joke.

 

 

 

 

Why did you avoid this post?  

[jehurey 3,299]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

No one is gaming at 700 nits SDR Sustained Windows.

They are at HDR peak brightness.

 

So answer the question

 

is 230 nits a better gaming display than 600-700 nits brightness

 

answer the question.