Microsoft has signed a 10 year deal to bring Xbox games to Nintendo Systems...... *Update*.. Similar deal signed with GeForce now for PC games.

[jehurey 3,313]

1 minute ago, Jerrys Hair Line said:

Mike Tyson's Punch-Out!! was re-branded simply as Punch-Out!!, and re-released in the U.S. and Europe in 1990[22] and 1991, respectively

which Nintendo would have to register an entirely new IP Copyright.

 

You literally just typed the word re-brand

 

an entirely NEW and SEPARATE brand

you just lost the entire argument, right there.

 

[jehurey 3,313]

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

which Nintendo would have to register an entirely new IP Copyright.

 

You literally just typed the word re-brand

 

an entirely NEW and SEPARATE brand

you just lost the entire argument, right there.

 

it’s the same copyright  it was always “Punch-Out!!!”… from day one. The “Mike Tyson” portion was a license.

 

There were other Punch Outs before the Tyson game, obviously you didn’t know that

Edited February 23, 2023 by Jerrys Hair Line

[jehurey 3,313]

Just now, Jerrys Hair Line said:

it’s the same copyright

 

No, its not.

 

you have absolutely zero evidence of this.

 

You don't CHANGE or edit a copyright...........you have to register a new copyright.

 

Oh man, he knows he fucked up when he used the word re-brand

 

He knows that he just lost the argument, right there.

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, its not.

 

you have absolutely zero evidence of this.

 

You don't CHANGE or edit a copyright...........you have to register a new copyright.

 

Oh man, he knows he fucked up when he used the word re-brand

 

He knows that he just lost the argument, right there.

How do you re-brand something you don’t own?  You’re digging your own hole deeper

[jehurey 3,313]

2 minutes ago, Jerrys Hair Line said:

How do you re-brand something you don’t own?

by submitting a new copyright that you DO own.

 

oh my god...........he's literally self-owning himself at this point.

 

He lost the argument the moment he said the word re-brand.

[jehurey 3,313]

Mike Tyson can, and WOULD lay claim.....................to a copyright that has his own name.

 

How.............the.................fuck................did this dumbass not realize this, very, VERY simple concept.

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Mike Tyson can, and WOULD lay claim.....................to a copyright that has his own name.

 

How.............the.................fuck................did this dumbass not realize this, very, VERY simple concept.

 

how wrong you are

[jehurey 3,313]

Just now, Jerrys Hair Line said:

 

how wrong you are

No............that's just a reprint of the "first publication" as it reads in the note.

 

They can hold onto that copyright, because they signed a deal with Mike Tyson.

 

For

The

NES

version.

 

Do you see Mike Tyson's SUPER Punch-out for the SNES?

 

Do you see Mike Tyson's Punch-out for the Wii?

 

You are literally just showing the original 1987 game's copyright submission.

 

Mike Tyson can EASILY claim the copyright if Nintendo tries using it without him outside of the original NES version.

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

No............that's just a reprint of the "first publication" as it reads in the note.

 

They can hold onto that copyright, because they signed a deal with Mike Tyson.

 

For

The

NES

version.

 

Do you see Mike Tyson's SUPER Punch-out for the SNES?

 

Do you see Mike Tyson's Punch-out for the Wii?

 

You are literally just showing the original 1987 game's copyright submission.

 

Mike Tyson can EASILY claim the copyright if Nintendo tries using it without him outside of the original NES version.

He lost  Nintendo OWNS the copy right to “Mike Tyson’s Punch Out”

 

as I said from day one

 

they don’t make it now because they don’t have the LICENSE.

Edited February 23, 2023 by Jerrys Hair Line

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

7 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Mike Tyson can, and WOULD lay claim.....................to a copyright that has his own name.

 

[jehurey 3,313]

Just now, Jerrys Hair Line said:

He lost  Nintendo OWNS the copy right to “Mike Tyson’s Punch Out”

No............Nintendo owns the right to the NES release using that title.

 

They literally cannot use it for anything else. And they couldn't release that title again today without signing a new deal, and paying more money to Mike Tyson.

 

Its an abandoned copyright.  No longer in use.

 

You already know this.

 

You already lost the moment you used the word re-brand.

[jehurey 3,313]

Just now, Jerrys Hair Line said:

sweetie...................please show me Nintendo selling retail copies of "Mike Tyson's" Punch out on a store front, right now.

 

I'll wait

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

 

 I tried to tell you retards

 

@Goukosan @FIREPOWER

 

[jehurey 3,313]

Just now, Jerrys Hair Line said:

 

 I tried to tell you retards

 

@Goukosan @FIREPOWER

 

Nope, you just reposting the same thing from yesterday............that specifically noted it was "for PS5 videogame"

 

LOL this guy is trying to run away from the thread again, since he knows he's lost.

 

Watch him try to smiley his way out

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

sweetie...................please show me Nintendo selling retail copies of "Mike Tyson's" Punch out on a store front, right now.

 

I'll wait

they don’t have the license to license THEIR IP like that… who the fuck is arguing that they can?  They absolutely own the IP, just as Sony owns “The Show” IP.

 

tag me when you have ANY proof otherwise.  Because you’ve been beaten into the ground ITT 

[jehurey 3,313]

Just now, Jerrys Hair Line said:

they don’t have the license to license THEIR IP like that…

yes they do

 

Sony doesn't, LITERALLY does not own the word "MLB".

 

They literally can't

[jehurey 3,313]

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand he lost, again

 

 

they literally had to submit a new copyright, just like I said.

 

A NEW BRAND.

 

that's what a re-brand would entail.

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

Just now, jehurey said:

yes they do

 

Sony doesn't, LITERALLY does not own the word "MLB".

 

They literally can't

yes they literally can, because it’s licensed. They can make the same game without the license, using the same IP. Just as Nintendo did

 

god damn you’re fucking stupid 

[Tears of the Cows 1,282]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand he lost, again

 

 

they literally had to submit a new copyright, just like I said.

 

A NEW BRAND.

 

that's what a re-brand would entail.

 

 

that’s a different game within the exact same IP  you’ve been fucking destroyed 

 

bu bu Mike ownz it!!!1 it haz hiz nameeeeee!!!1 

 

you probably think halo infinite has the same copyright as halo 1

Edited February 23, 2023 by Jerrys Hair Line