Remij

I can't wait for this game.   

8 hours ago, Legal US Citizen said:

Frostbite games have destructible environments, more advanced destruction than anything seen in CP which was relegated to some holes being pierced in a wall and materials breaking off of pillars. In terms of environmental scale who knows how large Anthem is, it looks massive, you're also not factoring in the high levels of vegetation, rocky surfaces which are much more geometrically complex and water simulation. Also most of the geometry in CP is flat and cylindrical shapes, buildings, streets and vehicles are very basic geometry, assets is what should be your keynote. As I noted earlier in another thread the AI and environmental assets are quite limited in scope, its not this lush alive and filled city that its been made out to be by misrepresented media hype, everything about 150+ feet out fades into nothing, empty streets with fade in for environmental assets and AI as you move near.

 

In terms of AI routines they don't seem to be anything more advanced than what is taking place in Fort Tarsus or really most open world games with AI, people walking around, standing against walls, conversations taking place, looking at stuff, it's basic and the peak seen is about 75. I think you want this to be more advanced than it actually is, you bought into the pre-gameplay media hype where you and I started disagreeing heavily and now you are running with it. The funny part in all of this is it's diverging more and more from this next-generation personification you believed it to be. By the day CDPR is talking more and more about it, releasing more information, they're already talking about the collector's edition for crying out loud, not giving any wiggle room for camera setup, photo mode etc, they're full blown talking.

 

This game is imminent, they've become chatty cathy's about it and are stepping up marketing all over the place. The writing is on the wall for a 2019 release on current generation hardware, development is scalable and you seem to have forgotten that which is ironic given your PC fanaticism and its inherent scalability.

 

 

Frostbite games have destructible environments... but not Anthem..  There's absolutely NOTHING in Anthem even close to the same level as CP..  And when comparing the environments, I was specifically referring to the vegetation and rock formations... Those are instanced and not very computationally expensive compared to the sheer vastness and variety of the objects and textures found in CP.  I didn't buy into the hype more than anyone else did...  What they showed is pretty much what I expected..  The city is massive and dense... and vertical.  This isn't some Novigrad shit... which the consoles struggled with..it's on a completely different level.. and there's no other game I know of with this fidelity at THAT density and scale.

How exactly is it diverging from what I believed it to be?  CDPR is talking more about it because they are at the point where they HAVE to start talking about it.. lmao.  You're reading more into that because that's what you want to believe.  This was THE FIRST showing of the game... and they're adamant to say that it's not representative of the final product.  They've been going out of their way to say that they are worried that this is what people will think the game looks like.. lmao.  Very likely because it's going to be improved from this point.. as a PC/Next gen title.  This game isn't releasing in 2019.  It's 2020 at the earliest...  You're not seeing PS4 or XO footage at all yet... It's running at 1080p on a GPU many times more powerful...  They haven't even begun optimizing it yet.. and I honestly doubt that PS4/XO versions are even functional at this point... if it was as far along as you say... they'd have shown the game running on the Xbox One X.

And no... sorry, I haven't forgotten that development is scalable... in fact, when we were arguing about it, I specifically said that if it does release for the PS4/XO consoles then it will be a shell of their initial vision for the game... I don't think CDPR will be willing to sacrifice their vision.

2 minutes ago, Legal US Citizen said:

Such as?

The amount of options you have during gameplay.  Destructible environments.. The incredible open world CITY with WAY more unique geometry than the instanced terrain of Anthem, with tons of AI routines running at any given moment.  Completely seamless world... The visuals.. the sheer density.

CP2077 is on another level than Anthem during gameplay... In Anthem you have an open world... but with barely any AI..  It looks great graphically.. but it looks like Mass Effect gameplay with Robot suits. You have enemies which will attack and take cover and the basic shit like that.. but it's not going to be involved even close to the same level as CP2077... using the environment to your advantage.

CP2077 is going to be amazing.  

39 minutes ago, Legal US Citizen said:

I don't know how people can accept this as current generation without issue yet view Cyberpunk as some mind bending absurdity to even think that, cognitive dissonance if I've ever seen it.

Because CPU wise CP2077 is doing shit this game could only dream of..  

It looks insane graphically.  It always did though.

Still playing Guacamelee 2.  This game is awesome.  God damn some of these areas are just GORGEOUS looking.  Very similar to the original but when you really start to look at the tiny details, this one is head and shoulders above the first.  

I fucking love playing as the Pollo  

Guacamelee 2.  What an awesome game so far.  It's also beautiful as hell

3 hours ago, -GD- said:

forza 7 looks so good on my sony x900f. holy fuck. 

I know  

FH4 soon breh  

4 hours ago, Alphonse said:

@Remij_ I disable it. People can still post them using their smartphones or browser plugins but they won't show in the emoticon drop down menu. It was the only way to make the OG smiley show first.

Alright. Hopefully everyone's cool with that, otherwise you could change it back and I'll just deal with it.  I didn't realize it wouldn't be possible to change the order without removing them completely.  Thanks breh

@Alphonse Hey man, all the emojis and shit is cool, and I really like how they are organized.. but from the drop down menu can you put the SW smileys firs in the list under the recently used ones, and then the other emojis after?  Having to scroll all the way down to the bottom, especially with so many emojis now is kind of a pain.

Just now, madmaltese said:

Well the fact I hate spiders is probably a major part of it lol. 

They jump at you, slowly crawl on you out of no where (like you look down and they start coming up), there is gigantic ones,etc. 
It was just the first time I did the level though, after that it was fine. My wife was watching me play the first time though and she has never laughed so hard in her life. I was freaking the fuck out. 

Oh yea, I think I remember you talking about that before.  Yea I guess if you have certain phobias they do a good job at using them against you. haha

1 minute ago, madmaltese said:

Scariest thing I've ever played. 

Seriously?  It doesn't seem  like it would be all that scary to me.  Though I haven't played it yet... but it's basically a roller coaster ride and you already know shit is going to jump out at you.

What about it makes it so scary?

1 minute ago, madmaltese said:

I literally started the game, ran around some island with basically zero idea what im doing. Hopped on a ship and sailed for 2 min and was like, fuck this. 

Yea.. I feel that's what a lot of people have done without giving the game a proper chance.  The fact that the game doesn't hand hold you is just one of the things I love about it.

People these days just have no patience for anything if they aren't rewarded immediately. 

The hate on SoT. 

Ya'll are hopeless.  

20 minutes ago, madmaltese said:

RE7 is ridiculously good. 

 

Also just got gamepass but really only for the PC play anywhere titles atm (Was $1 for a month). So will try SoD2 and maybe even Sea of Thieves.

 

Also why the hell isn't Forza 7 on gamepass?

Not sure why, but it will go there eventually.  Don't even worry about that though FH4 will be there day 1.

What a fucking godly service really, when you think about it.

Just now, Twinblade said:

so does RE7 actually have VR support on PC yet? That is one of Capcom's biggest oversights this gen.

Nope  

4 hours ago, bhytre said:

You still haven't truly experienced it though, no real games like RE7 in VR on PC  

 

Oh my dear child... how wrong you are.

I played RE7 in VR in week ONE.

And Lone Echo is something not even RE7 matches.  There's more games like this on PCVR than PSVR.

Oh well, you're beginning to see the light.  Better late than never  

2 hours ago, bhytre said:

I'm rapidly overcoming VR nausea, played RE7 while standing and everything felt much better, from seeing yourself walking in the game world to turning your head and body to look around you. Feels very natural and the head tracking works well. 

Some things don't work that well because you feel like you want to interact in the game with your hands and it's not as immersive with the regular controller. 

The atmosphere, sense of dread and fear is terrifying, when you see a dark room ahead of you you really don't feel like going in there, jump scares are scary af as well

I was actually leaning backwards when an enemy was lunging at me with a knife. 

Also had a fan running in my room and the RE7 candle which gives off a ashy & musty scent, it really elevates the experience a lot and matches the old house's environment. 

 

I still can't play it for too long in one session and the graphics really aren't there yet, but it's so different from what I'm used to play. 

Great stuff, VR is here to stay 

 

 

 

 

Late to the Partre  

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

yes it does. LOL

 

you just undermined yourself from the get-go.

No it doesn't. You're so fucking clueless LOL...  

Life is gonna hit Jerry HARD.

I guess when you view things like Jerry... it kind of makes sense why he hates white people.  Everything is JUST SO UNFAIR!!!  

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

and you don't know if that bakery HAS accepted people after closing time, because that happens as well.

 

And throws everything you said out the window.  You can almost say that it depends on the establishment.  Its a bakery shop, its not like they need to worry about local alcohol sales laws.

It doesn't matter if it has happened before... lmao.  I love how you insinuate that if it's happened once, that means it can/should always happen.

Life doesn't work that way... and your argument is worth less than the paper your coupons are printed on.  

1 minute ago, madmaltese said:

When I use to work at a bar in a restaurant, the second you accept customers they can order and take as long as they like. There were days where the place was 'closed' at 10pm or so but we still had people there at 12am. Ppl that were accepted from before 10pm. THe amount of ppl we would reject every day (after 10pm) while the place was still full and still have to serve the people at the tables. Eg, new person comes to order a drink it's 'sorry we are closed', but if a customer who was already there eating ordered one you have to serve them. It's the most common practice everywhere. Jehurey just lives in la la land.  

And it doesn't matter how many people tell him this... he's perfectly content to live in his ignorant assed little world.

Thanks @Hot Sauce

3 minutes ago, Hot Sauce said:

 

Well the shit fit happened outside and in the video she made she doesn't say they were rude, she was just complaining about not being served despite the doors being open and people being in line.

 

Maybe it's what you're saying, but the evidence we've seen implies the lady took the incident as racism and wanted to leverage social media to punish the store. The store response is more likely an overreaction and easy way to appease the mob.

link me to the womans vid pleeeeeese.

Just now, jehurey said:

No I can't tell.

 

…………...because you aren't.  You made that statement to reassure YOURSELF.

 

No point in trying to portray it in any other way. lol 

No.. because the statement I made would actually supposedly prove YOUR side.

Notice how I'm always saying how YOU aren't asking the questions when I make these statements?

You keep saying, well perhaps this and perhaps that... but aren't interested in asking where the proof is from the woman... or where the proof is from the store owner.

At the end of it all... you can simply say "Well, it's his right to fire them for whatever reason he wants anyway"  Which just shows me you don't really give a fuck and are purposefully being ignorant.

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Except you only ask these questions...…...not because you're genuinely interesting in finding out, but rather because you use them to only support ONE narrative that you favor over any other possibility.

 

That's why I called it Glenn Beck/Fox News style of question.

Nah... I've seen enough... I'm really looking for something that helps YOUR argument... if you couldn't tell.