Goukosan 2,255 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 1 minute ago, ghostz said: It’s reallt not much different than how I described, but of course you couldn’t tell me why either way, it won’t work, and it will never be pushed to office. The progressive tax rate she proposed was used for and worked for decades until the mid 80s when Reagan changed it. Its actually very different than you described... lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Goukosan said: The progressive tax rate she proposed was used for and worked for decades until the mid 80s when Reagan changed it. Its actually very different than you described... lol Why do you think it hasn’t been that way since? Dumbass Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Gouk makes $11 a hour, no wonder he wants this lmao Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Just now, ghostz said: Why do you think it hasn’t been that way since? Dumbass The only thing changed is the rate You have no reason to be this dumb when Google exists. Ghostz thinks a PROGRESSIVE tax rate means the entire rate is applied to your entire earnings Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Just now, Goukosan said: The only thing changed is the rate You have no reason to be this dumb when Google exists. Ghostz thinks a PROGRESSIVE tax rate means the entire rate is applied to your entire earnings It means once you earn over a certain amount, you’ll be taxed at that rate. As I said. Someone earning 33 million would owe just shy of 20 million in taxes. Why do you fee so entitled to something you didn’t work for? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Why does it have to be 10 million gouk? How about 30k like you make? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 How the fuck are you going to tell anyone they don’t deserve money they worked for? Are you crazy? These are the types of proposals that get people killed lmfao Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 29 minutes ago, ghostz said: She makes 175k a year. She should donate 100k of this obviously. In other words........she is earning a Congressman's salary? Is that your claim? You do know that "middle-class" is listed as households up to $250,000, right? Its amazing how you guys expect more out of her than you do from millionaires. I have no idea when people who only make $40-$50K a year started wanting to defend millionaires and billionaires. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, ghostz said: Why does it have to be 10 million gouk? How about 30k like you make? Because a person who is earning more than $10 million dollars a year in income is much, much, much (insert several hundred more "much"s) more capable of surviving with a 70% tax rate on every dollar they earn after $10 million. That actually needed to be explained to you? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, ghostz said: It means once you earn over a certain amount, you’ll be taxed at that rate. As I said. Someone earning 33 million would owe just shy of 20 million in taxes. Why do you fee so entitled to something you didn’t work for? No it doesn't mean that dumbass. It's a PROGRESSIVE tax rate..... you have no excuse to be this dumb Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, jehurey said: In other words........she is earning a Congressman's salary? Is that your claim? You do know that "middle-class" is listed as households up to $250,000, right? Its amazing how you guys expect more out of her than you do from millionaires. I have no idea when people who only make $40-$50K a year started wanting to defend millionaires and billionaires. Middle class can be listed as whatever. 75k is enough for a single woman to live on. She again, needs to donate 100k or she’s a part of the problem. I don’t expect more, I expect the same. Edited January 24, 2019 by ghostz Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Just now, jehurey said: Because a person who is earning more than $10 million dollars a year in income is much, much, much (insert several hundred more "much"s) more capable of surviving with a 70% tax rate on every dollar they earn after $10 million. That actually needed to be explained to you? He literally thinks the 70% is taxed on your ENTIRE earning. His dumbass doesn't realize its only for the money over the limit to Trigger 70%. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Goukosan said: No it doesn't mean that dumbass. It's a PROGRESSIVE tax rate..... you have no excuse to be this dumb How about trying to decredit 20 million taxes on a 33 million dollar salary please try you fucking retard Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Just now, ghostz said: Middle class can be listed as whatever. 75k is enough for a single woman to live on. She again, needs to donate 100k or she’s a part of the problem. No it isn't. It is defined at households up to $250,000. She is not upper class, she is, most definitely middle class. And, she is easily one of the least wealthy congressmen because the average congressmen is a multi-millionaire. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, jehurey said: Because a person who is earning more than $10 million dollars a year in income is much, much, much (insert several hundred more "much"s) more capable of surviving with a 70% tax rate on every dollar they earn after $10 million. That actually needed to be explained to you? I think someone making 175k as a single person is more than well off. Yes, they should donate at least 100k by your very same logic. How are you going to determine is someone is wealthy enough? jerry - I think you’re wealthy enough on your 26k salary to donate 10k. Go ahead and do it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Just now, jehurey said: No it isn't. It is defined at households up to $250,000. She is not upper class, she is, most definitely middle class. And, she is easily one of the least wealthy congressmen because the average congressmen is a multi-millionaire. What does a single person need 175k a year for? They don’t. Maybe If they wanna vacation and enjoy life. But the can surely still live with 75k, or are you saying 75k is poverty? LMAO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Goukosan said: He literally thinks the 70% is taxed on your ENTIRE earning. His dumbass doesn't realize its only for the money over the limit to Trigger 70%. oh wow, he really is stupid and doesn't understand how marginal tax rates work. LOL Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tears of the Cows 1,209 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Just now, jehurey said: oh wow, he really is stupid and doesn't understand how marginal tax rates work. LOL Tell me how someone making 33 million wouldn’t have to pay almost 20 million in taxes oh wait, they would Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 1 minute ago, ghostz said: I think someone making 175k as a single person is more than well off. Yes, they should donate at least 100k by your very same logic. How are you going to determine is someone is wealthy enough? jerry - I think you’re wealthy enough on your 26k salary to donate 10k. Go ahead and do it. No, she has to pay for her own residence in Washington D.C. as well as living in her existing apartment in New York. You don't get to determine if somebody is rich. And you are just trying to do what 50 year old right-wingers say facebook and make those same excuses. She is not upper class. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, ghostz said: Tell me how someone making 33 million wouldn’t have to pay almost 20 million in taxes oh wait, they would Okay. Edited January 24, 2019 by jehurey Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.