Liberals of SW, what percentage of your paycheck do you donate to the less fortunate?

[Remij 4,676]

1 minute ago, ghostz said:

Lmao  

 

bu bu I’m flat out wrong bu bu maybe not bc probably I’m right! 

I love that this is what you're arguing.. probably because I think you've lost every other argument 

[Remij 4,676]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

I love how I make fun of him of being weak, and he immediately proves it.

 

I got him posting like jonb...........who do you think is getting more satisfaction out of that. You? or Me?

^Jehurey is period posting right now 

 

Probablhurey on the rag 

[jehurey 3,230]

We have a new PERMANENT member to Jerry's Anonymous

 

[jehurey 3,230]

Holy shit................I am right, and @ghostz just lost the homeless argument.

 

Australia is counting OVERCROWDED dwellings as homeless.

 

 

Quote

 

Where are people staying?

• Improvised dwellings, tents or sleeping out 7% (8,200)
• Supported accommodation for the homeless 18% (21,235)
• Staying temporarily with other households 15% (17,725)
• Boarding houses 15% (17,503)
• Other temporary lodging 1% (678)
• “Severely” overcrowded dwellings 44% (51,088)

 

The official position of HUD for counting homeless people is that they DO NOT COUNT people who are currently at overnight homeless shelters. They only purely count people on the street.

 

The United States has actually 1.5 million homeless people, but HUD only recognized 553K as truly homeless.

 

In Australia, almost half of that 116K number is them counting people who are overcrowding a dwelling as "homeless"

 

Ghost absolutely lost.........................who would be STUPID ENOUGH to have bet on ghost and against basic common sense in this argument???????

 

Quote

Point-in-time single night counts prepared by shelter providers differ greatly from federal government accounts. In 2014, approximately 1.5 million sheltered homeless people were counted,^[1] a number that does not include at least half of the sheltered people refusing to be interviewed. In major cities, the ratio of sheltered people to unsheltered people ranges from 1:4 in Los Angeles^[2] to 12:1 in New York.^[3] These ratios further signify serious discrepancies between homeless populations and federal statistics.

[Tears of the Cows 1,208]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Holy shit................I am right, and @ghostz just lost the homeless argument.

 

Australia is counting OVERCROWDED dwellings as homeless.

 

 

The official position of HUD for counting homeless people is that they DO NOT COUNT people who are currently at overnight homeless shelters. They only purely count people on the street.

 

The United States has actually 1.5 million homeless people, but HUD only recognized 553K as truly homeless.

 

In Australia, almost half of that 116K number is them counting people who are overcrowding a dwelling as "homeless"

 

Ghost absolutely lost.........................who would be STUPID ENOUGH to have bet on ghost and against basic common sense in this argument???????

 

And you think Australia doesn’t have the same issue? 
 

until you come with the numbers, we’re done here  

 

and just like that, back to jerry the owned  

[jehurey 3,230]

1 minute ago, ghostz said:

And you think Australia doesn’t have the same issue? 
 

until you come with the numbers, we’re done here  

 

and just like that, back to jerry the owned  

They have 8,200 people sleeping on the street

 

The United States has 553,000 people sleeping on the street.

 

Those are the numbers.

 

YOU...............are done.

 

You lost bigtime. And you will avoid those numbers I just posted.

[Tears of the Cows 1,208]

7 minutes ago, jehurey said:

They have 8,200 people sleeping on the street

 

The United States has 553,000 people sleeping on the street.

 

Those are the numbers.

 

YOU...............are done.

 

You lost bigtime. And you will avoid those numbers I just posted.

He’s just making it up at this point. I LOVE it! 

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, ghostz said:

He’s just making it up at this point. I LOVE it! 

Nope.  I just posted it:

 

The actual "sleep on the street" number is 8,200.

 

HUD in America only counts "sleep on the street" as homelessness. Its 553K in America

 

You lost.

 

Quote

 

Where are people staying?

• Improvised dwellings, tents or sleeping out 7% (8,200)
• Supported accommodation for the homeless 18% (21,235)
• Staying temporarily with other households 15% (17,725)
• Boarding houses 15% (17,503)
• Other temporary lodging 1% (678)
• “Severely” overcrowded dwellings 44% (51,088)

 

[Tears of the Cows 1,208]

5 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Nope.  I just posted it:

 

The actual "sleep on the street" number is 8,200.

 

HUD in America only counts "sleep on the street" as homelessness. Its 553K in America

 

You lost.

 

As I’ve already stated this is the same issue with Australia as well, so BACK to jerry the owned.. AGAIN  
 

 

he’s just a battered wife at this point, he just keeps coming back for more 😂😂😂😂😂

[jehurey 3,230]

1 minute ago, ghostz said:

As I’ve already stated this is the same issue with Australia as well, so BACK to jerry the owned.. AGAIN  
 

 

he’s just a battered wife at this point, he just keeps coming back for more 😂😂😂😂😂

Oh my god...........he's now claiming that they are undercounting in Australia, basically trying to copy MY ARGUMENT?????

 

Probable +ghost = Probabl-ost

 

Or Probablost

 

More like Definitlost, actually. LOL

[Tears of the Cows 1,208]

4 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Oh my god...........he's now claiming that they are undercounting in Australia, basically trying to copy MY ARGUMENT?????

 

Probable +ghost = Probabl-ost

 

Or Probablost

 

More like Definitlost, actually. LOL

And just like that, Jerry debunked his OWN logic. I knew it would work, but THIS well? Even I thought you’d realize what you were about to do. Guess not. 
 

 

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, ghostz said:

And just like that, Jerry debunked his OWN logic. I knew it would work, but THIS well? Even I thought you’d realize what you were about to do. Guess not. 
 

 

Sorry ProbabLOST

 

You just lost the argument.

 

THis was your own image:

 

 

GUess where I got this information from?

 

 

Quote

 

Where are people staying?

• Improvised dwellings, tents or sleeping out 7% (8,200)
• Supported accommodation for the homeless 18% (21,235)
• Staying temporarily with other households 15% (17,725)
• Boarding houses 15% (17,503)
• Other temporary lodging 1% (678)
• “Severely” overcrowded dwellings 44% (51,088)

 

Yup, from the SAME WEBSITE you started this argument with:

 

https://www.homelessnessaustralia.org.au/about/homelessness-statistics

 

And now you're trying to say that you AGREE with me that they are undercounting.

 

Holy shit.............I wonder what @Remij_ has to say about you becoming ProbabLOST?????????

 

He's probably now becoming RunningAwaymij now.

[Tears of the Cows 1,208]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Sorry ProbabLOST

 

You just lost the argument.

 

THis was your own image:

 

 

GUess where I got this information from?

 

 

Yup, from the SAME WEBSITE you started this argument with:

 

https://www.homelessnessaustralia.org.au/about/homelessness-statistics

 

And now you're trying to say that you AGREE with me that they are undercounting.

 

Holy shit.............I wonder what @Remij_ has to say about you becoming ProbabLOST?????????

 

He's probably now becoming RunningAwaymij now.

You already debunked your OWN logic. This ones over, folks. 
 

the “liberals” haven’t donated a damn thing! My point was made.

[jehurey 3,230]

1 minute ago, ghostz said:

You already debunked your OWN logic. This ones over, folks. 
 

the “liberals” haven’t donated a damn thing! My point was made.

he just RAN AWAY from the homeless argument.

 

I RAPED him with his own website that he was referencing.

 

 

How did I debunk my own logic?  The US homeless rate is officially 553K AND THEY ARE STILL UNDERCOUNTING.

 

Because Australia is 8,200 homeless on the street and 38,000 living in temporary shelter.

 

Compare that to United States 553,000 homeless on the street and 1.5 million living in temporary shelter.

 

US absolutely blows away Australia in either statistic..........and they STILL UNDERCOUNT.

 

Oh my god, he's getting FULL ON ASSRAPED

[Tears of the Cows 1,208]

Just now, jehurey said:

The US homeless rate is officially 553K 

 

 

he raped himself AGAIN

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, ghostz said:

 

 

he raped himself AGAIN

Sorry.....................you pretending to NOT READ YOUR OWN ARTICLE is why you have lost this argument.

 

FROM'

YOUR

OWN

ARTICLE

 

 

Quote

 

Where are people staying?

• Improvised dwellings, tents or sleeping out 7% (8,200)
• Supported accommodation for the homeless 18% (21,235)
• Staying temporarily with other households 15% (17,725)
• Boarding houses 15% (17,503)
• Other temporary lodging 1% (678)
• “Severely” overcrowded dwellings 44% (51,088)

 

 

United States homeless count does NOT include temporary shelters.

 

They only count people sleeping on the street.

 

That means that the Australia number that directly compares to the US is 8,200

 

The US has 553,000

 

Those are the stats.

 

You lost, and you know it.....................you will avoid this at all costs, but it won't matter. You already know I just raped you.

[Tears of the Cows 1,208]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Sorry.....................you pretending to NOT READ YOUR OWN ARTICLE is why you have lost this argument.

 

FROM'

YOUR

OWN

ARTICLE

 

 

 

United States homeless count does NOT include temporary shelters.

 

They only count people sleeping on the street.

 

That means that the Australia number that directly compares to the US is 8,200

 

The US has 553,000

 

Those are the stats.

 

You lost, and you know it.....................you will avoid this at all costs, but it won't matter. You already know I just raped you.

I don’t even need to argue when you debunk yourself, LOL. Almost too easy.

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, ghostz said:

I don’t even need to argue when you debunk yourself, LOL. Almost too easy.

He avoided it again.

 

DefiniteLOST

 

He genuiinely is avoiding scrolling down the page from his OWN source that he has loaded up on his iCheapo.

 

OR.............maybe there's a perfectly valid technical reason for why ghost didn't know that.

 

Maybe his shitty iPhone simply didn't have enough memory to load the entire webpage???????????

[Tears of the Cows 1,208]

Just now, jehurey said:

He avoided it again.

 

DefiniteLOST

 

He genuiinely is avoiding scrolling down the page from his OWN source that he has loaded up on his iCheapo.

 

OR.............maybe there's a perfectly valid technical reason for why ghost didn't know that.

 

Maybe his shitty iPhone simply didn't have enough memory to load the entire webpage???????????

He can’t comprehend why or how he owned himself, he’s THAT owned. 
 

don’t worry jerry, one day you’ll get it. 
 

until then, this might help

 

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, ghostz said:

 

Thanks for posting that picture IN YOUR OWN POST

 

Quite apt, considering I was talking about your iPhone.

 

That photo arrived at the PERFECT time. LOL