A professor of "ethics" ..

[Goukosan 2,255]

15 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

Immunize the ones that are the majority of deaths FIRST. Stfu seriously 

 

You have to stop the ones who spreads it first Cooke.  How can you be this stupid? 😂🤣😂

 

How do you think infectious diseases are contained?  Stop patient zero (the spreader) and if it's too late for that you stop the group that can potentially spread it the most. 

 

Older people will be one of the first groups get the vaccines, just after essential workers. 

Edited December 22, 2020 by Goukosan

[lostfool 680]

God damn cooke is as dumb as a box of rocks

[Cooke 2,029]

4 hours ago, Goukosan said:

 

You have to stop the ones who spreads it first Cooke.  How can you be this stupid? 😂🤣😂

 

How do you think infectious diseases are contained?  Stop patient zero (the spreader) and if it's too late for that you stop the group that can potentially spread it the most. 

 

Older people will be one of the first groups get the vaccines, just after essential workers. 

Ok let's try this

 

 

There's this cold thats killing babies people at extremely high rates but for the most part older people do not die.

 

Do you immunize the babies first?

 

Do you immunize everyone else first? 

 

You get so fucking tied up in left wing right wing you blind yourself to logic. 

Edited December 22, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help

[jehurey 3,230]

2 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

Ok let's try this

 

 

There's this cold thats killing elderly people at extremely high rights but for the most part younger people do not die.

 

Do you immunize the people most likely to die first?

 

Do you immunize everyone else first? 

 

You get so fucking tied up in left wing right wing you blind yourself to logic. 

You immunize the people most likely to GET INFECTED, first.

 

And the ones who we need for the other 90% of the population to get the resources that they need on a daily basis.

 

You protect the elderly from getting infected the same way since March of this year: stay at home, wear a mask, safe distance.

 

You are wrong.

 

Your example is wrong.

 

And you don't have an argument.

 

 

[Cooke 2,029]

18 minutes ago, jehurey said:

You immunize the people most likely to GET INFECTED, first.

 

And the ones who we need for the other 90% of the population to get the resources that they need on a daily basis.

 

You protect the elderly from getting infected the same way since March of this year: stay at home, wear a mask, safe distance.

 

You are wrong.

 

Your example is wrong.

 

And you don't have an argument.

 

 

No you are wrong. You immunize those most AT RISK. Holy fuck you are dumb. 

[Goukosan 2,255]

1 hour ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

Ok let's try this

 

 

There's this cold thats killing babies people at extremely high rates but for the most part older people do not die.

 

Do you immunize the babies first?

 

Do you immunize everyone else first? 

 

You get so fucking tied up in left wing right wing you blind yourself to logic. 

 

Where did I say anything about left wing or right wing?  Where are you getting that from? lmfao. 

 

Also what's up with you and these asinine analogies?   This is not a cold, it's not a car crash, it's not cancer or any of that dumbass comparisons you made this year get that through your thick skull. 

 

 

[Goukosan 2,255]

1 hour ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

No you are wrong. You immunize those most AT RISK. Holy fuck you are dumb. 

 

It's amazing to watch Cooke not grasp what the highly infectious component of a pandemic means.... 10 months into seeing it happen across the globe 😂🤣

[jehurey 3,230]

1 hour ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

No you are wrong. You immunize those most AT RISK. Holy fuck you are dumb. 

EXACTLY.

 

And those would be essential workers.

 

Thank you.

 

Essential workers are at risk at getting infected day-in and day-out, since March.

[Cooke 2,029]

20 minutes ago, jehurey said:

EXACTLY.

 

And those would be essential workers.

 

Thank you.

 

Essential workers are at risk at getting infected day-in and day-out, since March.

essential workers are NOT THE MOST AT RISK FROM DYING DUE TO COVID19. 

 

what fucking planet do you live on? I am an essential worker, I work for a group of meat suppliers, i visit 20 grocery stores a day, I want the people DYING FROM COVID to be immunized first. Me getting infected is not the same as someone who is elderly or immunocompromised getting infected. USE YOUR BRAIN JEHUREY> 

Edited December 23, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

essential workers are NOT THE MOST AT RISK FROM DYING DUE TO COVID19. 

 

 

Yes they are.

 

Here, let me show you:

 

Essential workers have to go to work.

 

Old people...........don't.

 

There you go, we just determined who is most at risk at getting infected.

[Cooke 2,029]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Yes they are.

 

Here, let me show you:

 

Essential workers have to go to work.

 

Old people...........don't.

 

There you go, we just determined who is most at risk at getting infected.

 

Hey dumbo, essential workers ARE NOT DYING FROM COVID19 in any significant number. If we protect essential workers grandparents then the death rate will fall to near ZERO. I know you're not very bright but you can at least pretend to understand this. 

[Cooke 2,029]

36 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

It's amazing to watch Cooke not grasp what the highly infectious component of a pandemic means.... 10 months into seeing it happen across the globe 😂🤣

Yes and Gouk, if you stop the people that die from the highly infectious disease from getting the highly infectious disease by vaccinating them first then the risk of death is minimized to near 0. For everyone. 

 

 

If everyone that has died from COVID19 over the age of 70 was vaccinated now the deaths would drop by 95%

Edited December 23, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help

[Cooke 2,029]

You all seem to treat having COVID19 as the exact same thing as being dead from COVID19. 

[jehurey 3,230]

1 minute ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

 

Hey dumbo, essential workers ARE NOT DYING FROM COVID19 in any significant number.

Yes, they are.

Straight from the CDC

Quote

 

What is already known about this topic?

As of October 15, 216,025 deaths from COVID-19 have been reported in the United States; however, this might underestimate the total impact of the pandemic on mortality.

 

What is added by this report?

Overall, an estimated 299,028 excess deaths occurred from late January through October 3, 2020, with 198,081 (66%) excess deaths attributed to COVID-19. The largest percentage increases were seen among adults aged 25–44 years and among Hispanic or Latino persons.

 

 

 

You are wrong.

 

You are not even close to being correct.

 

[Cooke 2,029]

8 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Yes, they are.

Straight from the CDC

 

 

You are wrong.

 

You are not even close to being correct.

 

where is the baseline number?  Don't even think about playing the percentage increase game. 

Edited December 23, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

where is the baseline number?  Don't even think about playing the percentage increase game. 

LOL, considering that the population of 25-44 age group is VASTLY BIGGER than the elderly.......it doesn't matter.

 

You are wrong.

 

And the reason why that 25-44 demographic has increased, is because they are the ones who would be essential workers.

 

Therefore they must be vaccinated first.

 

CDC guidelines agrees with me.

 

Not to mention that if a nurse or a grocery store worker goes down, it puts a strain on the national supply chain and the national healthcare system.

 

There's not one, but TWO REASONS why you would place them ahead.

[Cooke 2,029]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

LOL, considering that the population of 25-44 age group is VASTLY BIGGER than the elderly.......it doesn't matter.

 

You are wrong.

 

And the reason why that 25-44 demographic has increased, is because they are the ones who would be essential workers.

 

Therefore they must be vaccinated first.

 

CDC guidelines agrees with me.

 

Not to mention that if a nurse or a grocery store worker goes down, it puts a strain on the national supply chain and the national healthcare system.

 

There's not one, but TWO REASONS why you would place them ahead.

 

 

18 - 44 years old

601

3.9%

476

17

108

0.8%

 

 

3.9%  wow Jehurey. Teh crisis is real. 

 

95% of the deaths are 45 and up. 

[Goukosan 2,255]

19 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

Yes and Gouk, if you stop the people that die from the highly infectious disease from getting the highly infectious disease by vaccinating them first then the risk of death is minimized to near 0. For everyone. 

 

 

If everyone that has died from COVID19 over the age of 70 was vaccinated now the deaths would drop by 95%

 

Cooke you still with that false info that only old people die from Covid-19? 

 

Damn it bro.... its 10 months and you're still so fucking clueless 😂🤣

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

 

 

18 - 44 years old

601

3.9%

476

17

108

0.8%

 

 

3.9%  wow Jehurey. Teh crisis is real. 

 

95% of the deaths are 45 and up. 

sorry, you're not changing the subject.

 

the biggest risk for infection is essential workers.

 

who going to know more about this: your dumbass with an obvious right-wing agenda to find something to bash against "da looney left"?

 

Or the CDC saying that essential workers should be next?

 

Gee......who to believe?

[Cooke 2,029]

Just now, Goukosan said:

 

Cooke you still with that false info that only old people die from Covid-19? 

 

Damn it bro.... its 10 months and you're still so fucking clueless 😂🤣

No bro. I said most, majority, the odds, etc. That doesn't mean zero chance. 

 

There is always a chance. The entire point of this is immunizing those who have the HIGHEST CHANCE OF DYING. get it? seriously, not that complicated.. bro.