jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, Substatic said: Yup, and RTINGS also said that PC peak brightness was a negative in four different sections of their review you do know that its brightness, when reviewed completely on its own, also reviews poorly right? Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 1 minute ago, Substatic said: You're the one not getting out, rofl. why would I want to get out of winning this argument, and completely destroying you? you still don't have a computer monitor that delivers the same display quality that many TV owners do. That statement is 100% correct. Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Substatic said: What the fuck? @jehurey can you post your pc gaming setup this can't be real. You're roasting my PC gaming setup for having the tied for first place PC gaming display, while you're using a 1080P for PC gaming? Fucking A. I refuse to believe he's THAT much of a joke. Answer the question. Stop dodging for once. Everyone sees this post and they see you not responding. You are being crucified. Post your PC gaming desk setup within an hour. Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, Substatic said: Real scene peak is not the same as sustained, you retard you sustained peak brightness is even lower its at 226 nits Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, jehurey said: why would I want to get out of winning this argument, Easy Jerry. Showing this score is fake: Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, jehurey said: you sustained peak brightness is even lower its at 226 nits Sustained 100% window you dumb mother fucker. This is SDR. You just learned about displays this 1 hour lol. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, Substatic said: Easy Jerry. Showing this score is fake: it is, because its comparing monitors to other monitors. and your claim was that you were gaming better than console gamer's television displays So the review score doesn't apply. Thank you for pointing out that the score IS INDEED FAKE So we move onto basic, verifiable facts 230 nits is lower than 600-700 nits Correct? Can you imagine how bad you look if you run away from this simple question? Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, jehurey said: you were gaming better than console gamer's television displays I never said this. Fucking making shit up Jerry. Gas lighting scumbag. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, Substatic said: Sustained 100% window you dumb mother fucker. then your monitor goes down to Hall of Fame this thread. Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, Substatic said: Easy Jerry. Showing this score is fake: JERRY The review is still 8.9 for gaming and 8.9 for HDR. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, Substatic said: I never said this. yes you did. And now, since you are saying you never said this, you are basically saying that you AREN'T playing on a better display than console gamers. Thanks for officially losing. Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, jehurey said: Hall of Fame this thread. That's the wrong one. They should hall of fame this, for you lying in almost every post: Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, jehurey said: you AREN'T playing on a better display than console gamers. The same fucking display. Just a lot higher fps and settings in 99% of games. I never said I had a monitor better than all displays. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, Substatic said: JERRY The review is for the monitor compared to other monitor. The argument is your gaming display versus console gamers display on their OLED television. so, the arbritrary review score is irrelevant. We now use basic facts Is 230 nits more than 600-700 nits Yes or No? Can you imagine how bad you look if you don't answer this question, and attempt to run back to a completely made-up and arbitrary review score, again? Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 3 hours ago, jehurey said: ....you still don't have a computer monitor that delivers the same display quality that many TV owners do. Jerry why did you lie in your first post? Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 1 minute ago, Substatic said: That's the wrong one, they aren't hall of faming a lie, he thought that was better. But nope, its 133 because you run it in PC mode, or else you lose input lag. Imagine A hermit Who claims to be a hermit Intentionally turning off low input lag on their monitor Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, Substatic said: Jerry why did you lie in your first post? I didn't you don't game better than console gamers you have a pathetic peak brightness of 230 nits correct? Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, jehurey said: you don't game better than console gamers First of all I do, because of higher settings and FPS. Sustained 100% window is all that matters in SDR and that's the same on PC. Secondly, That's not what you said, Quote ....you still don't have a computer monitor that delivers the same display quality that many TV owners do. Admit you got raped. Now. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,318 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Just now, Substatic said: First of all I do, because of higher settings and FPS. Sustained 100% window is all that matters No Unless you play a game that has a frozen screen. You don't have 100% white at all times, do you? Wow................you really are stupid and don't know how they measure HDR do you? That's why people like Vincent Teoh and RTINGs usually stick to 10% window. And RTINGs uses something called "Real Scene" to determine average real world scenario 100% sustained is NOT A REAL WORLD SCENARIO Hall of Fame this thread. Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 484 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, jehurey said: But nope, its 133 because you run it in PC mode, or else you lose input lag. You're reading RTINGs wrong. The 177~ is the correct figure, confirmed by Hardware Unboxed who actually say it is ~179. The ~133 is for: Quote Below are the results for the brightness tested with Game Optimizer setting disabled in PC Mode with the Picture Mode still on 'Game Optimizer'. The 177~ is for regular PC mode with GO on (which is standard default) Quote These results are from after calibration in the 'Game Optimizer' Picture Mode with Game Optimizer enabled and the input set to 'PC', which lets you achieve low input lag and proper text clarity when using it as a PC monitor. Holy shit either you are lying or retarded. Which is it. Edited November 4, 2022 by Substatic Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now