DynamiteCop 2,087 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 Just now, jehurey said: No. The population had its best chance to overthrow the government when they were EQUALLY ARMED with the same type of weapons. Which would've been about over 100 years ago. Sorry............another bullshit myth from the gun lobby got debunked. Its basically the same argument anti-vaxxers use. This has never been about overthrowing the government, it's always been about checks and balances with it and the ability for the populous to protect itself from a tyrannical government should one form. Much like we have an electoral college or term limits these things are checks and balances to keep things within parameters of control. So far the experiment has worked. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,238 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: This has never been about overthrowing the government, it's always been about checks and balances with it and the ability for the populous to protect itself from a tyrannical government should one form. Much like we have an electoral college or term limits these things are checks and balances to keep things within parameters of control. So far the experiment has worked. And you can't check the government with the weaponry you have. You already have "checks and balances" Its called voting., and its called having an educated military structure that pledges to defend the constitution in the event of tyranny. Wow............you just made your CORE DEFENSE against the Second Amendment sound even more unnecessary. LOL. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 2 hours ago, jehurey said: ., and its called having an educated military structure that pledges to defend the constitution in the event of tyranny. Mmmmmmm. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,238 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 1 minute ago, kokujin said: Mmmmmmm. That is why military command requires extensive education. Technically, they have a right to not follow a command if they believe it genuinely violates the constitution. Its clearly one of those things that hasn't been tested. But the concept is supposed to exist. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, jehurey said: That is why military command requires extensive education. Technically, they have a right to not follow a command if they believe it genuinely violates the constitution. Its clearly one of those things that hasn't been tested. But the concept is supposed to exist. I am so down for that being in the constitution and especially if and when military execs ones in the upper arm of the pentagon have to oath by everyday! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaz 2,439 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 1 hour ago, kokujin said: I am so down for that being in the constitution and especially if and when military execs ones in the upper arm of the pentagon have to oath by everyday! do you have a japanese citizenship? I'd like to go there. can you vouch for me? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
roflpwnedz 289 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 care Quote Link to post Share on other sites
McWicked 825 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 15 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said: Like I asked McWicked before he vanished, what is there to fix and how is it supposed to be fixed? It's as if my first post on the subject flew right past you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Im changing my mind currently. Cops dont work for us ... 🇺🇸 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) On 2019-03-24 at 5:25 PM, DynamiteCop! said: It's called insurance pal, it exists for a reason. Dumbass slave to capatalism so dumbass he's a slave to capatalism also misses entire I mean entire point of post in ironic needle to butthole. INSURANCE MAKES YOU POOR AND THOSE ALREADY IN OWNERSHIP OF INSURANCE WEALTHY YOU DO NOT BENEFIT AMERICA HAS MONEY 💰 U DUMB ROCK PAY FOR SLAVERY. Edited March 26, 2019 by kokujin Quote Link to post Share on other sites
James Skywalker 528 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Everyone commits fucking suicide. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,087 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 20 minutes ago, kokujin said: Dumbass slave to capatalism so dumbass he's a slave to capatalism also misses entire I mean entire point of post in ironic needle to butthole. INSURANCE MAKES YOU POOR AND THOSE ALREADY IN OWNERSHIP OF INSURANCE WEALTHY YOU DO NOT BENEFIT AMERICA HAS MONEY 💰 U DUMB ROCK PAY FOR SLAVERY. I'm not wealthy and I had private insurance even when I was working for employers which didn't offer it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,238 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Having for-profit MIDDLE-MEN in healthcare is so stupid. I can understand doctors working for profit I can understand hospitals working for profit. They're jobs, they want to make money. I get it. But why do we need to pay PRIVATE FOR-PROFIT COMPANIES to do the paperwork and collect the pool of money and organize the payouts? Can anybody explain that. These people aren't medical experts, they're just paper-pushers. They draft up documents, sell promises on paper, collect money, make phone calls, fill out forms, and issue payouts. Why did we FORCE Americans to use private for-profit companies for the paperwork??????????? Why don't we have a government administration do the middle-work, the paperwork? Its an issue of efficiency, and no matter how much anyone would want to complain about the government, multiple insurance agencies who have to exist in all 50 states, running 50 different sets of paperwork and purposely charging more money because the insurance company is meant to earn a profit on top of expense..........there's no contest. Single-payer is going to lead to lowered cost for healthcare for an entire nation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
McWicked 825 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, jehurey said: Having for-profit MIDDLE-MEN in healthcare is so stupid. I can understand doctors working for profit I can understand hospitals working for profit. They're jobs, they want to make money. I get it. But why do we need to pay PRIVATE FOR-PROFIT COMPANIES to do the paperwork and collect the pool of money and organize the payouts? Can anybody explain that. These people aren't medical experts, they're just paper-pushers. They draft up documents, sell promises on paper, collect money, make phone calls, fill out forms, and issue payouts. Why did we FORCE Americans to use private for-profit companies for the paperwork??????????? Why don't we have a government administration do the middle-work, the paperwork? Its an issue of efficiency, and no matter how much anyone would want to complain about the government, multiple insurance agencies who have to exist in all 50 states, running 50 different sets of paperwork and purposely charging more money because the insurance company is meant to earn a profit on top of expense..........there's no contest. Single-payer is going to lead to lowered cost for healthcare for an entire nation. Before the usual suspects get ass-blasted, every single first world country that has a single payer system spends less per-capita, that's less per person per year, than the United States. We're paying more for less because the extra money goes towards administration, not doctors, and not patients. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 4 hours ago, McWicked said: Before the usual suspects get ass-blasted, every single first world country that has a single payer system spends less per-capita, that's less per person per year, than the United States. We're paying more for less because the extra money goes towards administration, not doctors, and not patients. But i like calling you kiddo and snowflake. I wanna pay more. I survived the ass gouge. And i want pookie and doedoe who aren't as educated as I to have no insurance, Thus being poor behind and sick enough to steal my car Cuz that's the snowflake-free society I want to live in 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) I also dont want doedoe to have worst access to mental counseling in hs, so he gets really deranged and fucks my wife. Gotta save a few bucks. Tax cut for the wealthy? Take my money. 💰 Trickle your wealth down on my poor tits. Edited March 26, 2019 by kokujin Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.