The Mother Fucker 26 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Would you believe me? CPU: AMD FX-8300 OC to 4.2GHz ~ 4.5GHz turbo boost GPU: EVGA GTX 670 FTW 4GB (SLI) RAM: 16GB Cruicial Ballistix 1866Mhz Storage: running off a 2TB HDD well it does. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,088 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Yes, because there's two GPU's in there which are roughly 60% more powerful than the Pro's GPU when combined. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,298 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 21 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: Yes, because there's two GPU's in there which are roughly 60% more powerful than the Pro's GPU when combined. And more powerful than the Xbox One X version as well. Those GTX 670's are delivering 2.7 TFLOPS each, for 5.4 TFLOPS, and since those are nVidia performance metrics, thats probably about 7TFLOPS in AMD GCN performance. Yeah those old nVidia gpus in SLI would do the trick. Wonder what the cost was. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,696 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 I doubt it . Doesnt pro have a 60fps mode ? X does . And probably not at the resolutions pro uses . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Mother Fucker 26 Posted June 3, 2019 Author Share Posted June 3, 2019 43 minutes ago, JONBpc said: I doubt it . Doesnt pro have a 60fps mode ? X does . And probably not at the resolutions pro uses . My setup is 1080p @ 30 frames. The TR benchmark was averaging 34fps. Probably could achieve 60 frames if the CPU wasn't a major bottleneck. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Mother Fucker 26 Posted June 3, 2019 Author Share Posted June 3, 2019 I promise you the graphic detail of my setup blows away the PS4 Pro version. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Running games at console settings shows you just how far ahead PC hardware really is in some cases. The settings above that like Ultra and shit are completely wasted vs the performance cost. If next gen console games focused on just pushing up and multiplying the factors of effects like how PC "ultra" settings do.. then they'll perform like shit and the games wouldn't look that much better. We'll get better effects and everything.. because the games will be designed around them.. not simply because they'll multiply the factors of them. You can get a PRO/X1X tier experience off of modest hardware these days. 30fps at 4K is pretty easy at console settings isn't hard on mid range parts. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,696 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 11 minutes ago, The Mother Fucker said: My setup is 1080p @ 30 frames. The TR benchmark was averaging 34fps. Probably could achieve 60 frames if the CPU wasn't a major bottleneck. Well pro and X both run higher resolutions than that at 30 and I'm not sure about pro but x has a 60fps mode . I'm assuming so does pro . So , not really . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,696 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 8 minutes ago, Remij_ said: Running games at console settings shows you just how far ahead PC hardware really is in some cases. The settings above that like Ultra and shit are completely wasted vs the performance cost. If next gen console games focused on just pushing up and multiplying the factors of effects like how PC "ultra" settings do.. then they'll perform like shit and the games wouldn't look that much better. We'll get better effects and everything.. because the games will be designed around them.. not simply because they'll multiply the factors of them. You can get a PRO/X1X tier experience off of modest hardware these days. 30fps at 4K is pretty easy at console settings isn't hard on mid range parts. The hardware would still be more expensive than pro and X why game on PC if your gaming at 30fps Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,088 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 13 minutes ago, The Mother Fucker said: My setup is 1080p @ 30 frames. The TR benchmark was averaging 34fps. Probably could achieve 60 frames if the CPU wasn't a major bottleneck. The X is as follows 1080p 60 FPS @ Xbox One base system settings 1920x2160 30 FPS @ PC maximum settings (sparse rendered to 3840x2160) Native 4K 30 FPS @ Xbox One base system settings So I guess the X shits all over that PC. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,164 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 I have two 670's in SLI on my old box and yeah... they didn't age well. One game isn't really telling, but I'd say they're pretty close in comparison. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, JONBpc said: The hardware would still be more expensive than pro and X why game on PC if your gaming at 30fps The hardware is roughly the same cost as a PRO and X together... and you literally get most of the best games. And on PC you have the choice... 4K 30.. 1440p 60.. 1080p 90.. whatever. There's plenty of reasons. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,696 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Remij_ said: The hardware is roughly the same cost as a PRO and X together... and you literally get most of the best games. And on PC you have the choice... 4K 30.. 1440p 60.. 1080p 90.. whatever. There's plenty of reasons. Plenty of reason to choose both consoles over that . ShitBagMits LOL Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,088 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Just now, JONBpc said: Plenty of reason to choose both consoles over that . ShitBagMits LOL Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Just now, JONBpc said: Plenty of reason to choose both consoles over that . ShitBagMits LOL Not enough for YOU to apparently Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,696 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Pro was a mistake . Maybe I'll get a ps5 . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Just now, JONBpc said: Pro was a mistake . Maybe I'll get a ps5 . It wouldn't be the first time you've talked massive shit about something and then went ahead and bought it. (an $800 Dell rofl) Then you'll hate it... say that you never use it and want to get rid of it.. and then you'll claim that your opinion on it matters because you had one and know first hand Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,088 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Just now, Remij_ said: It wouldn't be the first time you've talked massive shit about something and then went ahead and bought it. (an $800 Dell rofl) Then you'll hate it... say that you never use it and want to get rid of it.. and then you'll claim that your opinion on it matters because you had one and know first hand I had an Nvidia GPU once, what a piece of shit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,712 Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: I had an Nvidia GPU once, what a piece of shit. Must be why their business failed.. oh wait Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,696 Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 24 minutes ago, Remij_ said: It wouldn't be the first time you've talked massive shit about something and then went ahead and bought it. (an $800 Dell rofl) Then you'll hate it... say that you never use it and want to get rid of it.. and then you'll claim that your opinion on it matters because you had one and know first hand I just play about PC. I game alot on PC. Ps4 sucked tho . Idc about 90 percent of Sony 1st party. Next gen I'm not going to have 3 platforms I know that. I cant even keep up with the free games on PC and gamepass now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.