Jump to content

Digital Foundry - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

Quad Damage

By Quad Damage,
in System Wars

 Share Followers 0

Recommended Posts

DynamiteCop

DynamiteCop 2,088

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Team 2019 said:

The X has lost or matched multiple Pro games. That's just a BAD showing for more powerful hardware, period.

 

When was the last time the S best the PS4? I can't even recall an instant.

A loss would be if they were at the same resolution with worse performance, a match would be if they were at the same resolution with the same performance. 

 

That isn't what's happening. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

JonDnD

Cows probably weren't expecting to buy a pro that Sony labeled as a 4k machine and play games at 1080p either lol .   You can tell the cows are butthurt.  They grasp so hard .   Li

Quad Damage

Quad Damage 1,763

Posted
  • Author
Posted
29 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

I don't have the tools the test this shit but I know for a fact games get multiple performance addressing patches post release, it's not rocket science. 

 

no receipts = tales from your ass, isnt rocket science either. because i know for a fact that lots of devs dont give a shit about post release support, and that patches can improve one thing while making another thing worse.

 

hypothetical patches are beside the point though

 

the point is: x isnt delivering the best of everything (iq AND performance) in some of the biggest multiplats of 2019 like cod, out of the box.

 

any x owner who put down $500 in 2017 telling me they anticipated that to be the case or were content with that being the case, in 2017, is straight up full of shit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DynamiteCop

DynamiteCop 2,088

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Quad Damage said:

 

no receipts = tales from your ass, isnt rocket science either. because i know for a fact that lots of devs dont give a shit about post release support, and that patches can improve one thing while making another thing worse.

 

hypothetical patches are beside the point though

 

the point is: x isnt delivering the best of everything (iq AND performance) in some of the biggest multiplats of 2019 like cod, out of the box.

 

any x owner who put down $500 in 2017 telling me they anticipated that to be the case or were content with that being the case, in 2017, is straight up full of shit.

 

Devil May Cry 5 (DMC5) version 1.08

  • added fixes for crashing issues.
  • Added fixes for stuttering and lag issues.
  • Devil May Cry 5 1.08 update has added some UI fixes.
  • added performance and stability improvements.
  • Added various minor bug fixes.

 

DMC5 update 1.09

  • added fixes for crashing issues.
  • Added fixes for stuttering and lag issues.
  • Devil May Cry 5 1.09 update has added some UI fixes.
  • Added performance and stability improvements.
  • Various other under the hood improvements.

 

Devil May Cry 5 (DMC5) Update 1.10 patch notes

  • Added fixes for crashing issues.
  • Added fixes for stuttering and lag issues.
  • Added some UI fixes.
  • Added performance and stability improvements.
  • Other under the hood changes.

 

DMC5 update 1.11

  • added fixes for crashing issues.
  • Added fixes for stuttering and lag issues.
  • DMC5 version 1.11 update has added some UI fixes.
  • Performance and stability improvements.
  • Various other under the hood improvements.

-----------------------------------

 

It's not hard to find this information if you're not retarded, this is the reality for basically every game in existence, and the reality for all AA/AAA games post release. They don't stop working on them when they release, what Digital Foundry tests isn't the same performance profile down the line. You have autism. 

 

 

Edited by DynamiteCop!
Link to post
Share on other sites
Quad Damage

Quad Damage 1,763

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

 

Devil May Cry 5 (DMC5) version 1.08

  • added fixes for crashing issues.
  • Added fixes for stuttering and lag issues.
  • Devil May Cry 5 1.08 update has added some UI fixes.
  • added performance and stability improvements.
  • Added various minor bug fixes.

 

DMC5 update 1.09

  • added fixes for crashing issues.
  • Added fixes for stuttering and lag issues.
  • Devil May Cry 5 1.09 update has added some UI fixes.
  • Added performance and stability improvements.
  • Various other under the hood improvements.

 

Devil May Cry 5 (DMC5) Update 1.10 patch notes

  • Added fixes for crashing issues.
  • Added fixes for stuttering and lag issues.
  • Added some UI fixes.
  • Added performance and stability improvements.
  • Other under the hood changes.

 

DMC5 update 1.11

  • added fixes for crashing issues.
  • Added fixes for stuttering and lag issues.
  • DMC5 version 1.11 update has added some UI fixes.
  • Performance and stability improvements.
  • Various other under the hood improvements.

-----------------------------------

 

It's not hard to find this information if you're not retarded, this is the reality for basically every game in existence, and the reality for all AA/AAA games post release. They don't stop working on them when they release, what Digital Foundry tests isn't the same performance profile down the line. You have autism. 

 

 

 

patch notes tell you the intended fix, not the resultant fix, idiot.

 

now you just need to provide an account of a qualified person testing those patches, and provide an updated head to head comparison - for that game and every other one i listed.

 

while youre at it, feel free to address the actual point of all of my posts:

 

patches are beside the point though

 

the point is: x isnt delivering the best of everything (iq AND performance) in some of the biggest multiplats of 2019 like cod, out of the box.

 

any x owner who put down $500 in 2017 telling me they anticipated that to be the case or were content with that being the case, in 2017, is straight up full of shit.

 

you claim i have autism, but this is basically you (and jon) still defending x's dependability for delivering definitive wins for the biggest multiplats of 2019 :hest::

 

giphy.gif

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
DynamiteCop

DynamiteCop 2,088

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Quad Damage said:

 

patch notes tell you the intended fix, not the resultant fix, idiot.

 

now you just need to provide an account of a qualified person testing those patches, and provide an updated head to head comparison - for that game and every other one i listed.

 

while youre at it, feel free to address the actual point of all of my posts:

 

patches are beside the point though

 

the point is: x isnt delivering the best of everything (iq AND performance) in some of the biggest multiplats of 2019 like cod, out of the box.

 

any x owner who put down $500 in 2017 telling me they anticipated that to be the case or were content with that being the case, in 2017, is straight up full of shit.

 

you claim i have autism, but this is basically you (and jon) still defending x's dependability for delivering definitive wins for the biggest multiplats of 2019 :hest::

 

giphy.gif

 

Yes of course, they do optimizations and performance fixes for no purpose whatsoever.  They release 5-10 updates per game for absolutely no reason at all post release, sure thing. 

 

It's delivering the best IQ and performance in the 99th percentile of what is released, and in what it's not (performance wise) the chances that it will, is or has been patched to remedy this is extremely high.

 

You don't have a leg to stand on you dumb faggot. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Quad Damage

Quad Damage 1,763

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Yes of course, they do optimizations and performance fixes for no purpose whatsoever.  They release 5-10 updates per game for absolutely no reason at all post release, sure thing. 

 

It's delivering the best IQ and performance in the 99th percentile of what is released, and in what it's not (performance wise) the chances that it will, is or has been patched to remedy this is extremely high.

 

You don't have a leg to stand on you dumb faggot. 

 

i have concrete data from df, while you have patch notes out the wazoo.

 

$500 well spent :freeman:

Link to post
Share on other sites
DynamiteCop

DynamiteCop 2,088

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Quad Damage said:

 

i have concrete data from df, while you have patch notes out the wazoo.

 

$500 well spent :freeman:

You have data from when a game released or just before it did, and you also have the knowledge that there were multiple updates post release which specifically target performance fixes.  

 

You're choosing to be that retard which ignores them, that doesn't stop them from existing and being implemented. 

Edited by DynamiteCop!
Link to post
Share on other sites
Quad Damage

Quad Damage 1,763

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

You have data from when a game released or just before it did, and you also have the knowledge that there were multiple updates post release which specifically target performance fixes.  

 

You're choosing to be that retard which ignores them, that doesn't stop them from existing and being implemented. 

 

i cant ignore data that doesnt exist. until you can provide an account of those patches being re-tested, compared, and recorded, it is a literal non-starter.

 

meanwhile you still dont get why x needing patches to beat pro in late 2019 is so embarrassing.

 

answer these questions:

 

1) why isnt x delivering the best of everything (iq AND performance) in some of the biggest multiplats of 2019 like cod, out of the box ?

 

2) when you spent $500 on x in 2017, did you think it would have worse performance than pro in the biggest multiplats of late 2019 ? did you think you would have to wait for patches to beat pro ?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
JonDnD

JonDnD 2,698

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said:

You have data from when a game released or just before it did, and you also have the knowledge that there were multiple updates post release which specifically target performance fixes.  

 

You're choosing to be that retard which ignores them, that doesn't stop them from existing and being implemented. 

Cows probably weren't expecting to buy a pro that Sony labeled as a 4k machine and play games at 1080p either lol .

 

You can tell the cows are butthurt.  They grasp so hard .

 

Like when re2 performed better on X , they claimed ps4 won because it appeared cleaner on pro 

 

Then dmc5 , they claimed a few areas of better performance made up for the massive difference in resolution .

 

Literally claiming a few more plants or stumps are grass are a win over 50 percent resolution increase :D

 

pro was a mistake .

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DynamiteCop

DynamiteCop 2,088

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, JONBpc said:

Cows probably weren't expecting to buy a pro that Sony labeled as a 4k machine and play games at 1080p either lol .

 

You can tell the cows are butthurt.  They grasp so hard .

 

Like when re2 performed better on X , they claimed ps4 won because it appeared cleaner on pro 

 

Then dmc5 , they claimed a few areas of better performance made up for the massive difference in resolution .

 

Literally claiming a few more plants or stumps are grass are a win over 50 percent resolution increase :D

 

pro was a mistake .

It's the same with the cows on Gaf, these people are psycho.

 

They think this (they're lying to themselves)...

 

41546324454_e896c2bebe_o.png

 

Looks better than this...

 

48976160833_ed5ff9ba55_o.png

 

There's no logic with these people....

Link to post
Share on other sites
Remij

Remij 4,717

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

It's the same with the cows on Gaf, these people are psycho.

 

They think this (they're lying to themselves)...

 

41546324454_e896c2bebe_o.png

 

Looks better than this...

 

48976160833_ed5ff9ba55_o.png

 

There's no logic with these people....

What the ABSOLUTE FUCK is that?

 

That first picture HAD to be fucked with...

Edited by Remij_
Link to post
Share on other sites
Remij

Remij 4,717

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

It's not, that is what Gran Turismo Sport looks like... and this is on the Pro...

 

48978390686_849d80c4be_o.png

 

48899232752_ae42ec153c_o.png

Jesus fucking CHRIST :kaz: 

 

I was just looking at that thread Dynamite.  You straight up murdered that foo :lul: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
DynamiteCop

DynamiteCop 2,088

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

Jesus fucking CHRIST :kaz: 

 

I was just looking at that thread Dynamite.  You straight up murdered that foo :lul: 

Like it's not even a question, yes GTS has a more realistic lighting model (at times), I will give it that but absolutely everything else about it is an abomination sent from hell. 

Edited by DynamiteCop!
Link to post
Share on other sites
lynux3

lynux3 2,165

Posted
Posted (edited)

You absolutey murdered them, Deeno, I seen it. :wow: Now I'm gonna murder your cock. :ccruise:

 

Cock sucker. :mickey:

 

Spoiler

942664-forza-motorsport-7-windows-apps-s942665-forza-motorsport-7-windows-apps-s942666-forza-motorsport-7-windows-apps-s942667-forza-motorsport-7-windows-apps-s942669-forza-motorsport-7-windows-apps-s942673-forza-motorsport-7-windows-apps-s942670-forza-motorsport-7-windows-apps-s

 

^ Click there if you want to see a last gen game with lipstick. :puke: TLHBR.

 

 

 

Don't click if you're a lemming. :holeup:

Edited by lynux3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Quad Damage

Quad Damage 1,763

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, JONBpc said:

Cows probably weren't expecting to buy a pro that Sony labeled as a 4k machine and play games at 1080p either lol .

 

You can tell the cows are butthurt.  They grasp so hard .

 

Like when re2 performed better on X , they claimed ps4 won because it appeared cleaner on pro 

 

Then dmc5 , they claimed a few areas of better performance made up for the massive difference in resolution .

 

Literally claiming a few more plants or stumps are grass are a win over 50 percent resolution increase :D

 

pro was a mistake .

 

you seem very hurt that x continues to have worse performance than pro in huge multiplats in late 2019

 

same questions apply to you slow jon

 

when you spent $500 on x in 2017, did you think:

 

..x would have better or worse performance than pro in the biggest multiplats of 2019 ?

 

..x would have to wait for patches to beat pro in the biggest multiplats of 2019 ?

 

..x would still have less aaa/exclusive graphical showpieces than pro by late 2019 ?

 

 

if you and deeno cant give honest answers to these very simple questions.. then x was a mistake

 

Edited by Quad Damage
Link to post
Share on other sites
Quad Damage

Quad Damage 1,763

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said:

It's not, that is what Gran Turismo Sport looks like... and this is on the Pro...

 

48978390686_849d80c4be_o.png

 

48899232752_ae42ec153c_o.png

 

you still cant answer simple questions about the many failures of X; posting about racing games an shit now :mj:

Edited by Quad Damage
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Followers 0
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • Quad Damage
      Digital Foundry - The Outer Worlds
      By Quad Damage
      - View Distance: Low end CPU or 120 FPS recommended to drop setting for performance gains.
      - PS4 Pro: Slightly below high but above Medium.
      - XBX: Large grass is Medium, smaller grass is lower than Low. A lot of 'empty tufts' where grass should be.

      - PS4 Pro: Generally consistent at 1440p w/ a few 1080p counts showing dynamic. Drops are very rare.
      - Sky resolution is lower on the Pro which can cause some artifacts in the skybox.
      - XBX: Native 4K in empty scenes and lowest end 1512p, with most counts between these two.
      - Both Pro and X utilize UE4's temporal reconstruction but not that noticeable because of TAA and CA.

      - PS4 Pro very consistent 30 FPS in dialogues but incurs minor drops moving around the over-world.
      - Single drop frames happen more frequently in combat on the world, but stable at 30 indoors.
      - XBX can see drops to 27 FPS during overworld combat and traversal.
      - XBX "looks and plays worse here". Generally has more drops than Pro.
       
       
      let’s see how dicktuckcop and jon defend worse environment detail and worse performance than pro in *another* big multiplat in 2019 
×
×
  • Create New...