Ike★ 2,922 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 https://www.ign.com/articles/outriders-copies-sold-royalties-square-enix No wonder MS is just buying the studios outright instead of trying to get partners to buy in. There’s no profit or money to be had for them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 Did you actually read the article? This has more to do with Square Enix not being upfront with the developer. They say it sold between 2-3 million units and haven't received any royalties from square Enix. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,088 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Cooke said: Did you actually read the article? This has more to do with Square Enix not being upfront with the developer. They say it sold between 2-3 million units and haven't received any royalties from square Enix. Not to mention this game is on four other platforms that are not Xbox... OP is a retard. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Cooke said: Did you actually read the article? This has more to do with Square Enix not being upfront with the developer. They say it sold between 2-3 million units and haven't received any royalties from square Enix. No, did you read it. "according to the Publisher, the revenues from the sale of the game are lower than the total costs of its production (including Quality Assurance), distribution and promotion." Wojciechowski also suggests that a lack of profitability could be caused by the publisher, including distribution partnerships (the game was launched into Xbox Game Pass, for example)... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,717 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 48 minutes ago, Goukosan said: No, did you read it. "according to the Publisher, the revenues from the sale of the game are lower than the total costs of its production (including Quality Assurance), distribution and promotion." Wojciechowski also suggests that a lack of profitability could be caused by the publisher, including distribution partnerships (the game was launched into Xbox Game Pass, for example)... So uh... did you have a point besides proving his? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Remij said: So uh... did you have a point besides proving his? If the distribution partnership wasn't factored in the game would have been profitable at 2 - 3 million sold (guesstimate) and the developers would have gotten royalties. Which was Ike's point, which is something that you, Cooke and DynamiteCop apparently missed. the company had no firm data for copies sold: "We don't have any sales figures for Outriders" Edited August 17, 2021 by Goukosan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaz 2,445 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 xbox Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. House 3,371 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 I bet Square Enix are a scummy publisher to work with. Can't even give them sales numbers and doesn't give them a response as to why 0 royalties came on the date it was supposed to. Am I reading this right or is it just me? lmao 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,717 Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 2 hours ago, Goukosan said: If the distribution partnership wasn't factored in the game would have been profitable at 2 - 3 million sold (guesstimate) and the developers would have gotten royalties. Which was Ike's point, which is something that you, Cooke and DynamiteCop apparently missed. the company had no firm data for copies sold: "We don't have any sales figures for Outriders" No. The article is simply about the publisher not being upfront with the developer. The developer DOESN'T KNOW... so stop pretending like you do. This thread is retarded Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,617 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 That is very surprising considering the game was a huge hit when it launched. Wonder if it's some technicality that PCF get paid on sales which excluded them from the GP deal, which they clearly had no part in? 3 hours ago, Remij said: The article is simply about the publisher not being upfront with the developer. Not really. The article is about the devs not receiving royalties based on performance which indicate that the game didn't make any profits. They don't know the sales for Outriders because they didn't receive any payment from the royalty deal they agreed to with SE. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MalaXmaS 651 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 Isn't that shitty game also on Flopstation? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 4 hours ago, Remij said: No. The article is simply about the publisher not being upfront with the developer. The developer DOESN'T KNOW... so stop pretending like you do. This thread is retarded They didn't recieve royalties because the game didn't surpass the threshold to generate a profit and the developer mentions the the distribution partnership with MS as one factor Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,717 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 1 hour ago, madmaltese said: Not really. The article is about the devs not receiving royalties based on performance which indicate that the game didn't make any profits. They don't know the sales for Outriders because they didn't receive any payment from the royalty deal they agreed to with SE. So what about what you just said contradicts what I said? This isn't a Game Pass issue.. this is a SquareEnix issue... and until SquareEnix reveals the financials of the game... it's pure speculation. The developer estimates that 2-3 million copies were sold... and that they should be profitable by a certain date. That date has passed and they still haven't been paid... so either it simply hasn't reached the target that the developer assumes, or it ended up costing more than the developer knows. Regardless, SquareEnix hasn't been upfront with them about the game. Again, that's not a Game Pass issue.. That's a SquareEnix issue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hot Sauce 2,742 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 1 hour ago, madmaltese said: That is very surprising considering the game was a huge hit when it launched. Wonder if it's some technicality that PCF get paid on sales which excluded them from the GP deal, which they clearly had no part in? Yeah, it kind of sounds like Square might be pulling a Disney here and fucking them over. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ike★ 2,922 Posted August 18, 2021 Author Share Posted August 18, 2021 So MS just paid a lump sum to SE to have it listed on GP since they publish and maybe the developer negotiated a contract based on sales? That would be super scummy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,717 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, Goukosan said: They didn't recieve royalties because the game didn't surpass the threshold to generate a profit and the developer mentions the the distribution partnership with MS as one factor Read my post above. It's an article about the Publisher not being upfront with the developer.... not an article about the developer whining that Game Pass ruined their game Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Remij said: Read my post above. It's an article about the Publisher not being upfront with the developer.... not an article about the developer whining that Game Pass ruined their game The developer isn't whining about GP.... The developer is saying square used GP to fuck them over. What is it that you don't get? Edited August 18, 2021 by Goukosan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 6 minutes ago, Ike said: So MS just paid a lump sum to SE to have it listed on GP since they publish and maybe the developer negotiated a contract based on sales? That would be super scummy. Yes that's exactly what it is. They used GP to screw over the devs. GP will obviously hamper retail sales (despite what Phil and lemmings were saying for a year plus that it wouldn't).... Developer is now left out in the dark because that deal with MS for GP is a publishing deal between MS and Square. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,717 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 Just now, Goukosan said: The developer isn't whining about GP.... The developer is saying square used GP to fuck them over. What is it that you don't get? lmao... So what you're saying is that... the article is about the Publisher not being upfront with them The developer SUGGESTS... because they don't know.... because..... SquareEnix isn't being upfront with them.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 2 minutes ago, Remij said: lmao... So what you're saying is that... the article is about the Publisher not being upfront with them The developer SUGGESTS... because they don't know.... because..... SquareEnix isn't being upfront with them.. Because they used GP to knee cap retail sales. You know the GP model that you swore up and down would increase sales Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.