Starfield coming to PlayStation confirmed (FTC: Xbox Making Starfield and Redfall Exclusive 'Powerful Evidence' Against Activision-Blizzard Merger)

[jehurey 3,238]

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

Is a superior source than you

 

 

 

No he isn't, he's already been discredited, and he's been fanboying since the CMA decision.

 

Try again, second-class citizen

 

Its so funny seeing them strike-out over and over.

[jehurey 3,238]

rn

 

[Substatic 421]

11 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

Is a superior source than you with more credentials.  Where is your law degree? I expect a screenshot of your degree in your next post if you think your opinion is superior than his legal analysis if this court case thus far.

 

Michigan Business Attorney | Hoeg Law | Official Website

 

Some more bangers to own you with,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hush, distant second place SW warrior.

 

 

JERRY, you distant second place SW 30 fps Warrior....you have 24 hours to post that you have a legal degree of the same caliber or higher of Richard Heog. Until then, you are my bitch:

 

 

The clock is ticking. 

 

Edited June 25, 2023 by Substatic

[jehurey 3,238]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

 

JERRY, you have 24 hours to post

No, you don't have one.

 

and posting discredited people who have already been caught as MS shills doesn't work, either.

 

Go cry somewhere else, second-class................soon to be THIRD-CLASS citizen.

[Substatic 421]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

No, you don't have one.

 

 

23 hours and 57 minutes, my distant second placer.

 

Edited June 25, 2023 by Substatic

[jehurey 3,238]

2 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

 

That must be how long you'll be crying.

 

I love how you couldn't debunk anything I had to say.............thanks for losing.

 

And thanks even more for running to an already-discredited source, to confirm that you're crying.

[Substatic 421]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

That must be how long you'll be crying.

 

I love how you couldn't debunk anything I had to say.............thanks for losing.

 

And thanks even more for running to an already-discredited source, to confirm that you're crying.

 

And you didn't debunk anything the legal expert had to say about this specific case. He knows more than you, where is your law degree?

 

23 Hours and 53 Minutes to post your legal credentials, or admit he knows more than you on this.

 

Also,

 

Activision Tells Employees FTC Claims Are 'Factually Weak and Legally a Stretch' - IGN

 

TRUE.

 

Edited June 25, 2023 by Substatic

[jehurey 3,238]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

23 Hours and 53 Minutes.

 

Also,

 

Activision Tells Employees FTC Claims Are 'Factually Weak and Legally a Stretch' - IGN

 

TRUE.

 

Activision also told their employees that they didn't break and harassment and work ethics rules

 

he went from attempting to quote a discredited "legal expert"............to quoting Activision management

 

And here I thought he couldn't sound more desperate

[Substatic 421]

4 minutes ago, jehurey said:

he went from attempting to quote a discredited "legal expert"

 

 

 

I'll keep quoting him until you debunk him with either your own legal analysis (which would require you proving you have acquired a legal degree, which I HIGHLY doubt given your IQ level) OR citing your own legal expert.

 

Until then this debate has been lost by you, quite easily.

 

 

 

23 Hours and 46 minutes. Time is running out Jerry.

[jehurey 3,238]

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

I'll keep quoting him until you debunk him

Don't need to since he was already debunked with the CMA decision

 

Thanks for confirming that you will keep running to known discredited losers.............people like you.

[Substatic 421]

2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Don't need 

 

Hmm no citation, also no proof of your legal degree.

 

Take the L.

[jehurey 3,238]

Just now, Substatic said:

 

Hmm no citation

which is better than you citing somebody who WAS ALREADY PROVEN WRONGi love how he still doesn't understand this

[Substatic 421]

3 minutes ago, jehurey said:

which is better than 

 

Post a screenshot of your law degree if you want me to take your opinion of the trial thus far more seriously than that of a seasoned legal expert.

 

It's that simple.

 

Edited June 25, 2023 by Substatic

[jehurey 3,238]

4 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

Post a screenshot

 

Nope, you already lost when I told you YOU ARE RELYING ON SOMEBODY WHO WAS ALREADY PROVEN WRONG.

 

You just attempted to run away from that.

 

Congratulations...........that's where you lost the argument.

 

[Remij 4,683]

14 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Nope, you already lost when I told you YOU ARE RELYING ON SOMEBODY WHO WAS ALREADY PROVEN WRONG.

 

You just attempted to run away from that.

 

Congratulations...........that's where you lost the argument.

 

 

Going to be hilarious watching the FTC lose this case...  their arguments are as pathetic as yours are  

[jehurey 3,238]

Just now, Remij said:

 

 

Going to be hilarious watching the FTC lose this case...  their arguments are as pathetic as yours are  

LOL he's now ran to "jus' WAIT!"

 

guess he had nothing, either.

[Substatic 421]

1 hour ago, jehurey said:

Nope, 

 

Your L is accepted. You're done here.

[jehurey 3,238]

14 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

Your L is

yours

 

....since you just attempted to rely on somebody who's already been proven wrong.

 

And when I said that specific sentence............you ran away and didn't address

 

Thanks for confirming that you lost this argument. Now you have my permission to go and cry somewhere else.

[Spicalicious 128]

 

[kaz 2,439]

damn, jerry got murdered