Remij

I'm asking a question dipshit. You know.. information that's relevant. You're the one obsessively trying to be dramatic about everything

What game, and what res.. lmao? Of course 1080p DLSS is gonna be garbo

"I'm not being dramatic" "It's night and day" ...all in the same sentence

What am I trying to push? What am I ACTUALLY saying? You're being dramatic again

ROFL Timestamped the vid... TechJesus with the realness. BF5's implementation is definitely subpar and will be improved

DLSS

Every time you argue with me it becomes so And I never said the image was perfect... but it most certainly doesn't look like medium settings. Would you like me to destroy that opinion with screenshots? My issue with you is the way you exaggerate the difference.

RTX... is the future. DynamiteHBRTX

Yea you were. A worthless one at that

RTX - It's off Great little card though. Destroys AMDs offerings in that range

Nah, I disagree.

That's a very good question. I'm wondering that myself. I expect Sony to make smart decisions on a per game basis and not try to have their developers push for that extra resolution in lieu of better graphical effects. Thing is Jehurey, we don't really know what kinds of advancements Navi will bring with it.. so architectural efficiency improvements (Variable rate shading, Rapid Packed Math, and "Mesh shaders" or Geometry Shaders in AMDs case), are going to all play a part.. aside from that we can bet they've made improvements to their image reconstruction technologies. The perceptible dif

That was pre-patch.. dumbo.

My thoughts: At this point I'm pretty fairly certain the next gen consoles will both have Ray Tracing support... BUT.. that only means DXR support in software (whatever Sony uses as well), which as we all know has a fallback layer for GPUs which don't have accelerated RT cores. So the rumors stating Ray Tracing support could simply be referencing that. There COULD be dedicated hardware for accelerating Ray Tracing inside the next consoles. I wouldn't rule it out.. but it's more likely they'll just use the fallback DXR layer, and like I had said before, will use Ray Tracing spari

It's not going to follow you in this thread anymore.

I'm fairly certain Ori 1 and 2 will both be going to Switch. I've heard enough of this rumor, and combined with what the devs are saying themselves.. it seems quite clear this is what's going to happpen. @DynamiteCop! This thread is alright. Relax.. it's Friday. Whenever bodycount makes a thread bashing MS or Xbox... just take solace in the fact that he's the living embodiment of an Xbox fanboy who had his life destroyed by Phil. He's GOT to be hurting more than anyone else about this shit... don't let his guise fool you. Every word he types is killing him inside.. but he has

DLSS before the update: DLSS after update: DLSS off: Just look at the images full screen, not zoomed in or anything. The difference between pre- and post patch is huge obviously... and DLSS off looks a bit crisper... not at all worth 20fps difference.. 20fps by the way... is a gain of almost the amount of fps as the entire game runs on Xbox One X...

Really? Which ones have updated articles about the DLSS patch that just released? Most of them are from the initial DLSS implementation. And no shit it's going to look worse guys... the fact is... that it doesn't look SO MUCH worse like DramaticCop tries to make it sound, especially at normal viewing distances. I laugh when he does that shit.

In any given scene I'm seeing 12-20fps gains over native 4K with DLSS... usually closer to 20fps. And that's WITH ray tracing on... which makes all the difference in the world. Lemme test something real quick.

Even less so when you're.. actually playing.

You know what, that's kind of bullshit. The simple fact is that it commands a premium because it's the single fastest consumer GPU out there and there is no competition. Blame Nvidia all you want, but there's reasons why this shit is like this. As a consumer.. you're fine to think that... I'd love lower prices too... but you have to look at the reality here. Nvidia are the market leader, they're a generation ahead of their competitors in speed alone... then they're a generation ahead of that in technology. Not to mention, these GPU dies are massive, and that alone costs a lot of money..

Let's not even mention that shit because that has no bearing on the discussion and just gets people pissed off. I know any of these guys here could have the PC I have. It's not even a big deal. Actually, people here probably have better CPUs that I do already. All I'm saying is.. yes I know I get excited about technologies like this and I do talk shit up a lot... I can't help that shit... but I love shit like this. The whole inferencing and machine learning, and AI denoising and all these other technologies are interesting as fuck.. and even putting aside real-time image recons

They're charging for the service... using the service entails using Xbox live... Ironically only Xbox console users will have to pay for Live