-
Content Count
36,064 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
93
Content Type
Calendar
Profiles
Forums
Everything posted by Cooke
-
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
Exactly . So why were they included on a study on its affects on women? Lol -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
You must have watched this -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
Jehurey must be your alt -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
far left anti science doesn't even register as IQ. -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
Remy. Oh dear Remy. What is the goal of this study? Apparently it's to see how monkey pox affects women. Ok so why do trans women make up nearly half the test subjects? What is the purpose of combining them if not for political and social reasons? Clearly it's not scientific. Scientists know men pretending to be women are still men and do not have vaginas. They could easily do a study that focuses on men who pretend to be women if they wish.. But that's pointless. We already know monkey pox mostly affects men who have sex with men, many of those studies have already be -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
Yeah I did read it. Did you? It's fucking ridiculous. -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
You're deflecting. -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
Universities have been captured by your society destroying ideology.. So I'm not surprised. -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
Why? Why women and trans women together? What purpose would this serve other than to appease some stupid woke agenda that says trans women are women? Which science says they aren't. -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
So why not include men? Since trans women have male anotomy and are engaging in gay sex since they do not have vaginas? The whole premise is just woke bullshit. The title says it's women and non binary... Ok fine. All the non binary in the study have female anatomy, so they are women. The other half are men pretending to be women. Why exclude normal men? Mpox (as it's now known, so we don't insult monkeys) affects men 90%+ of the time. Sure go ahead and study the affects on women.. But why does it include trans women? That doesn't make biological sense. -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
Did you fucking read it dummy? -
Ok wtf is this? This is an actual Lancet study
Cooke replied to Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess's topic in Politics
The SJW hula hoops they jump through to satisfy the woke mob is hilarious. -
You didn't refute anything. The first thing you did was go off topic
-
Why is Twitter trying so hard to prevent Elon Musk from taking it over?
Cooke replied to Twinblade★'s topic in Politics
How is that not paying them for the work jehurey? -
Why is Twitter trying so hard to prevent Elon Musk from taking it over?
Cooke replied to Twinblade★'s topic in Politics
Government agencies were paying twitter to censor accounts. DHS, FBI, CIA etc. They had employees embedded at twitter. Many of these accounts were banned or blocked based on very little evidence of any wrong doing. But just simply speaking out against certain narratives. -
You haven't refuted anything. No one has in this thread. How have I "lost the talking point" . Lmao you haven't even talked about it yet.
-
You didn't debunk anything. And you're not debunking anything now. According to an archived version of the dictionary's website, Merriam-Webster formerly said a "vaccine" was "a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease The new definition of "vaccine", published in May, reads: "a preparation that is administered – as by injection – to stimulate the body's immune response against a specific infectious agent or disease."
-
The definition changed you twat. You didn't prove ANYTHING. If we had an actual vaccine based on the definition from 2019 the pandemic would be over. But what do we have? A therapeutic that creates an immune response. It used to be a shot that gave you IMMUNITY to a disease. Not just a response from your immune system. That is how small pox was eradicated. By an ACTUAL VACCINE.
-
Once again.. You didn't read or listen. But you sure are ready to pounce. Pathetic troll
-
Why is Twitter trying so hard to prevent Elon Musk from taking it over?
Cooke replied to Twinblade★'s topic in Politics
Ummm you obviously didn't listen lol. The twitter files don't just stop at Trump administration. It's about Biden administration too dumb dumb. -
Oh its behind a paywall.. Hit the listen button and you will be able to hear the whole thing.
-
"may make you". You ignored the qualifier.
-
https://www.wsj.com/articles/are-vaccines-fueling-new-covid-variants-xbb-northeast-antibodies-mutation-strain-immune-imprinting-11672483618