Jump to content

RDR2 X1X will have a 4k texture pack


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I just love how he always doubles back on things he's said elsewhere.  Like 2-3x the fps on PC in games means nothing... but this resolution bump is everything... It's a completely different experienc

What is Remipee doing in an RDR2 thread?    

The versions will have marginal differences. But when your console has no exclusives, you need to try and find some kind of ammo  

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, Vini said:

:D

 

This week will kick off two years of denial for cows

 

oh.......its finally going to begin NOW????

 

In the last week of October? 2018? 5 years into this gen???????

 

:lawl:don't think you realized what you just typed there.:lawl:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jehurey said:

oh.......its finally going to begin NOW????

 

In the last week of October? 2018? 5 years into this gen???????

 

:lawl:don't think you realized what you just typed there.:lawl:

 

Like I said  Death Standing won't save the cows from 2 years of increasingly shittier multiplats

Link to post
Share on other sites

The era cows are losing their minds lmao 

 

The pro might have the same texture pack . I hope so ...cause watching them graphics don't matter is hilarious :D

 

From YUCK I CANT IMAGINE PLAYING AT NON NATIVE RES in every DF thread to I CANT SEE :tear2:

 

Funniest thing ever . 

Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Vini said:

Like I said  Death Standing won't save the cows from 2 years of increasingly shittier multiplats

All Lemmings had shittier multiplats than PS4 for 4 years this gen. 

 

Over 95% of lemmings are still currently getting shittier multiplats than PS4. 

 

Only a small minority of lemmings are getting better multiplats. 

 

:bena:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

The PS3 had a weaker GPU than the Xbox 360, and a powerful but completely wasted CPU. 

The PS3 overall was more powerful than the 360.  PS3 was harder to develop for but it was definitely more powerful machine overall. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

The PS3 overall was more powerful than the 360.  PS3 was harder to develop for but it was definitely more powerful machine overall. 

 

 

 

 

 

Not really. 

 

PlayStation 3 RSX (NVIDIA G70) 90/65/45nm 550 MHz 228.8 Gigaflops

 

XBOX 360 ATI R500 Xenos 90/65/45nm 500 MHz 240 Gigaflops

 

Its floating point performance was actually lower than the Xbox 360 and it had half the RAM.

Edited by DynamiteCop!
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

All Lemmings had shittier multiplats than PS4 for 4 years this gen. 

 

Over 95% of lemmings are still currently getting shittier multiplats than PS4. 

 

Only a small minority of lemmings are getting better multiplats. 

 

:bena:

You've had shittier multiplats for 20 years :D

 

hide :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Not really. 

 

PlayStation 3 RSX (NVIDIA G70) 90/65/45nm 550 MHz 228.8

 

XBOX 360 ATI R500 Xenos 90/65/45nm 500 MHz 240

 

Its floating point performance was actually lower than the Xbox 360 and it had half the RAM.

:|

 

"the Xbox's total amount of RAM is slightly misleading, as the system RAM and video RAM are shared. The PS3's XDR RAM is also far more fast and efficient than the Xbox's GDDR3 RAM, running at a speed of 3.2 GHz compared to 700 MHz.

Final bandwidth numbers prove PS3 is the victor in this category.

 

The two CPU chips run at the same GHz speed, but the PS3's seven individual cores beat out the Xbox's three dual-threaded cores. And in terms of performance measured in gigaflops, the PS3 tops out at nearly three times that of the Xbox.

 

from a technical standpoint, the PS3 has more horsepower

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

The PS3 overall was more powerful than the 360.  PS3 was harder to develop for but it was definitely more powerful machine overall. 

 

 

 

 

 

That's why 360 had the best graphics in 95 percent of games 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

:|

 

"the Xbox's total amount of RAM is slightly misleading, as the system RAM and video RAM are shared. The PS3's XDR RAM is also far more fast and efficient than the Xbox's GDDR3 RAM, running at a speed of 3.2 GHz compared to 700 MHz.

Final bandwidth numbers prove PS3 is the victor in this category.

 

The two CPU chips run at the same GHz speed, but the PS3's seven individual cores beat out the Xbox's three dual-threaded cores. And in terms of performance measured in gigaflops, the PS3 tops out at nearly three times that of the Xbox.

 

from a technical standpoint, the PS3 has more horsepower

:snoop:

 

This is not true at all, a different memory type having a different operating frequency has zero relevance to the bandwidth throughput.

 

Video memory bandwidth Xbox 360: 21.6 GBps to system RAM; 256 GBps to eDRAM PlayStation 3: 22.4 GBps

 

You're again talking about the CPU, the 360 had a more powerful GPU. Do you know what else had a more powerful CPU? The Xbox One, how did that pan out against the PlayStation 4? Hell, the PS3 had a more powerful CPU than the PlayStation 4. Its relative effect on video games was a big fat nothing. The 360 was a more effective 3D rendering device, the PS3's CPU did nothing for it convoluted or not. 

Edited by DynamiteCop!
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DynamiteCop! said:

:snoop:

 

This is not true at all, a different memory type having a different operating frequency has zero relevance to the bandwidth throughput.

 

Video memory bandwidth Xbox 360: 21.6 GBps to system RAM; 256 GBps to eDRAM PlayStation 3: 22.4 GBps

 

You're again talking about the CPU, the 360 had a more powerful GPU. Do you know what else had a more powerful CPU? The Xbox One, how did that pan out against the PlayStation 4? Hell, the PS3 had a more powerful CPU than the PlayStation 4. Its relative effect on video games was a big fat nothing. 

 

 

https://m.ign.com/articles/2010/08/26/xbox-360-vs-playstation-3-the-hardware-throwdown

 

from a technical standpoint, the PS3 has more horsepower

 

Read it and weep, the PS3 overall was the more powerful system. 

 

Not going back and forth with your delusional ass about well established facts about last gen. 

 

PS3 was more powerful but harder to develop for. 

 

360 was weaker, but more developer friendly and more efficient than PS3. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

 

https://m.ign.com/articles/2010/08/26/xbox-360-vs-playstation-3-the-hardware-throwdown

 

from a technical standpoint, the PS3 has more horsepower

 

Read it and weep, the PS3 overall was the more powerful system. 

 

Not going back and forth with your delusional ass about well established facts about last gen. 

 

PS3 was more powerful but harder to develop for. 

 

360 was weaker, but more developer friendly and more efficient than PS3. 

Paper figures mean nothing, effective system performance is the only thing that matters. Like your garbage posts the PlayStation 3 was a paper tiger. The only supposed advantageous component of the PlayStation 3 was its CPU, the GPU and RAM were both bested by the Xbox 360 in not only paper figures but also effective performance. 

 

The PlayStation 3's CPU was theoretically more powerful, say that with me because it's important, the·o·ret·i·cal·ly. Was it effectively more powerful though meaning showing itself to be in practice? Absolutely not in every single use case, it remained theoretically more powerful because not one instance in its entire existence as a video game console showed it to be more effectively powerful. 

 

Edited by DynamiteCop!
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Paper figures mean nothing, effective system performance is the only thing that matters. Like your garbage posts the PlayStation 3 was a paper tiger. The only supposed advantageous component of the PlayStation 3 was its CPU, the GPU and RAM were both bested by the Xbox 360 in not only paper figures but also effective perfomrance. 

 

The PlayStation 3's CPU was theoretically more powerful, say that with me because it's important, the·o·ret·i·cal·ly. Was it effectively more powerful though meaning showing itself to be in practice? Absolutely not in every single use case, it remained theoretically more powerful because not one instance in its entire existence as a video game console showed it to be more effectively powerful. 

 

Games built from the ground up on on PS3 were ahead of what 360 could produce overall. 

 

Uncharted 2, 3, last of US, GOW 3, MGS4, Kill Zone 2etc.    The best looking games last gen were PS3 exclusives. 

 

Your delusions doesn't change that :cmpunk2:

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...