Pokémon Let's go sells 3 million in 3 days

[Goukosan 2,256]

14 minutes ago, Cookester15 said:

Nintendo always reports sell through. They don't report sold to retailers. 

the only time Nintendo report sold to retailers is the fiscal year quarterly reports and yearly reports. 

 

We get those every three months of their fiscal year. 

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

7 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

Hey Retard.... first week sales are always reported as launch day through sun of that week.  That's how sales data works. 

 

As far as a calendar week since release (7days) , it has not been a calendar week since the game has been out, these stats were posted last night (the 21st)....the Calender week ends on the 23rd and today is the 22nd.

 

So if this was calender week data it would have been reported a few days AFTER the 23rd. 

 

So unless they are reporting numbers from the future, this represents the first three days of sales you dense Ox. 

 

 

as far as sales, they said sold through not sold in.   You did this same BS Damage control when they tweeted that Octopath sold million in a short time frame.... your dumb ass thought they were hyping shipped. 

 

 

What is always hilarious about your dumbass is you ALWAYS double and triple down when you're proven wrong... time and time again 

 

Hey Retard.... This isn't "sales data", this isn't from some analyst firm, this is from the company itself and they're not stringent on any kind of scheduled dates for reporting sales. It's been a week.

 

1. Early sales the night of the 15th.
2. 16th
3. 17th
4. 18th
5. 19th
6. 20th
7. 21st
8. 22nd

 

It's now the 23rd on the other side of the planet if you were not aware so it's been in circulation for over a week. This was only reported a few hours ago, after a full 7 calendar days, so again you're just making up this "3 days" shit to make it appear more impressive than it actually is. No one is saying three days, they say "3 million in its first week of release".

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

5 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

its the same game you fucking clown. 

 

All Pokémon games have "two versions" of the same game.   All Pokémon sales data is based on the sales of those versions. 

 

It was reported last night, the full calendar week is tomorrow... if it was a 7 day report... it would be reported a few days after 7days have passed. 

 

Your damage control is pathetic. 

It's not the same game, it's two completely different SKU's with different content, different interactions, different Pokemon, different sales data and two separate prices at $59.99 for each individual game.

 

It's two different games being lumped together as one which means people will have bought both as they are in fact different.   

Edited November 22, 2018 by DynamiteCop!

[Goukosan 2,256]

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Hey Retard.... This isn't "sales data", this isn't from some analyst firm, this is from the company itself and they're not stringent on any kind of scheduled dates for reporting sales. It's been a week.

 

1. Early sales the night of the 15th.
2. 16th
3. 17th
4. 18th
5. 19th
6. 20th
7. 21st
8. 22nd

 

It's now the 23rd on the other side of the planet if you were not aware so it's been in circulation for over a week. This was only reported a few hours ago, after a full 7 calendar days, so again you're just making up this "3 days" shit to make it appear more impressive than it actually is. No one is saying three days, they say "3 million in its first week of release".

 

It was reported on the 21st (PST) .  So they already tabulated the sales for the 22nd and the 23rd in advance? 

 

I like how to had to add an extra day (the 15th) before the launch to try to make a point and still end up wrong. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

3 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

It was reported on the 21st (PST) .  So they already tabulated the sales for the 22nd and the 23rd in advance? 

 

I like how to had to add an extra day (the 15th) before the launch to try to make a point and still end up wrong. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It was reported at 2:36 PM on the 22nd, you know the date and time it was in Japan when that Tweet was made... Did you forget about time zones bud?

 

Also the game was available on the 15th at select retailers from 9PM onward, that's pretty typical especially for big releases.

Edited November 22, 2018 by DynamiteCop!

[Goukosan 2,256]

7 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

It's not the same game, it's two completely different SKU's with different content, different interactions, different Pokemon, different sales data and two separate prices at $59.99 for each individual game.

 

It's two different games being lumped together as one which means people will have bought both as they are in fact different.   

 

When games launch and they have "different versions" of the same game at retail.... eg Forza Deluxe edition, standard edition and ultimate edition. 

 

when sales are reported... do they separate  3 "versions" of the same game or is it counted as one...... lmfao fucking clown. 

 

 

 

 

[Goukosan 2,256]

9 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

It was reported at 2:36 PM on the 22nd, you know the date and time it was in Japan when that Tweet was made... Did you forget about time zones bud?

 

Also the game was available on the 15th at select retailers from 9PM onward, that's pretty typical especially for big releases.

Retard its WW sales... not Japan only sales.   The game release date was the 16th WW and the "first week" sales are through Sunday night.   Select retailers releases 3 hrs before the 16th doesn't change the game's industry wide release of the 16th. 

 

 

 

Does your dumbass think the "first week" Japanese sales  for Pokemon reported yesterday by Media Create also represents sales through wed? 

 

Does your dumbass think UK "first week" sales reported on Mon represented sales through Monday night UK time? 

 

All those were through Sunday you clown. 

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

9 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

When games launch and they have "different versions" of the same game at retail.... eg Forza Deluxe edition, standard edition and ultimate edition. 

 

when sales are reported... do they separate  3 "versions" of the same game or is it counted as one...... lmfao fucking clown. 

 

 

 

 

They're not different "versions", they're different games. Does Forza have two Metacritic scores? Forza is the same game with varying levels of included content packages, content that can all be purchased after the fact to complete the package as the "Ultimate Edition" if wanted.

 

This is not that, you can't get what's in one game in the other and vice versa. It's two different games that will have two different sales metrics, and there will be two game purchases for big fans if they want the complete experience. They're separate titles being lumped together as one, shut your fucking face you clown.

Edited November 22, 2018 by DynamiteCop!

[Goukosan 2,256]

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

They're not different "versions", they're different games. Does Forza have two Metacritic scores? Forza is the same game with varying levels of included content packages, content that can all be purchased after the fact to complete the package as the "Ultimate Edition" if wanted.

 

This is not that, you can't get what's in one game in the other and vice versa. It's two different games that will have two different sales metrics, and there will be two game purchases for big fans if they want the complete experience.

For the last time its the same game. 

 

Pokémon games and all other games that have different starter versions are counted as one sales wise because it's the same game. 

 

Your damage control 20 yrs later doesn't change how the sales data is tabulated and reported. 

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

2 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

Retard its WW sales... not Japan only sales.   The game release date was the 16th WW and the "first week" sales are through Sunday night.   Select retailers releases 3 hrs before the 16th doesn't change the game's industry wide release of the 16th. 

 

 

 

Does your dumbass think the "first week" Japanese sales  for Pokemon reported yesterday by Media Create also represents sales through wed? 

 

Does your dumbass think UK "first week" sales reported on Mon represented sales through Monday night UK time? 

 

All those were through Sunday you clown. 

Yeah, and sales for the world began in a timezone which is 17 hours ahead, and sales began before the "street date".

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

1 minute ago, Goukosan said:

For the last time its the same game. 

 

Pokémon games and all other games that have different starter versions are counted as one sales wise because it's the same game. 

 

Your damage control 20 yrs later doesn't change how the sales data is tabulated and reported. 

It's not the same game, there's no if's, and's or but's about it. It's indefensible, inarguable. 

Edited November 22, 2018 by DynamiteCop!

[Goukosan 2,256]

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Yeah, and sales for the world began in a timezone which is 17 hours ahead, and sales began before the "street date".

The sales are tabulated based on that region's launch date and time zone you buffoon.   

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

Just now, Goukosan said:

The sales are tabulated based on that region's launch date and time zone you buffoon.   

You're literally making this up, like straight from your brain and nowhere else. You have ZERO understanding of how The Pokemon Company is measuring their sales.

[Goukosan 2,256]

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

It's not the same game, there's no if's, and's or but's about it. It's indefensible, inarguable. 

 

You are a delusional clown.  20 yrs later you're arguing about different versions of a Pokémon game not being the same game... lmfao

 

 

[Goukosan 2,256]

4 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

You're literally making this up, like straight from your brain and nowhere else. You have ZERO understanding of how The Pokemon Company is measuring their sales.

says the guy who thinks this represents sales from future 

 

 

Like we all predicted, your ass was wrong as always....

 

3 million sold BEFORE black Friday and BEFORE Christmas. 

 

The total sales for this game through Dec 31st will be Bananas 

 

 

DynamiteCop actually thought this game wouldn't sell well... lmfao

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

7 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

You are a delusional clown.  20 yrs later you're arguing about different versions of a Pokémon game not being the same game... lmfao

 

 

Pot calling the kettle black right now. It's two games, you can't get what's on one in the other. This isn't some DLC shit you can get at any time or after release, it's severed content making each game a unique and independently functioning and selling title separate from the other. They're each full priced games, they're acknowledged as two games, they have two different Metacritic's, they have two different GameRanking's etc... If you want everything you have to buy both $59.99 games, separately.  It's two games, as I said this is inarguable, as to it cannot be argued, it's a fact of reality. This is not debatable, this is over.

Edited November 22, 2018 by DynamiteCop!

[Goukosan 2,256]

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Pot calling the kettle black right now. It's two games, you can't get what's on one in the other. This isn't some DLC shit you can get at any time or after release, it's severed content making each game a unique and independently functioning and selling title separate from the other. They're each full priced games, they're acknowledged as two games, they have two different Metacritic's, they have two different GameRanking's etc... If you want everything you have to buy both $59.99 game, separately.  It's two games, as I said this is inarguable, as to it cannot be argued, it's a fact of reality. This is not debatable, this is over.

 

Nintendo announced omega red and blue Launch week sales. 

 

http://siliconera.com/2014/11/26/week-sales-pokemon-omega-ruby-alpha-sapphire/

 

 

 

 

Nintendo reports Pokémon X&Y launch week sales. 

 

https://www.polygon.com/2013/10/15/4840738/pokemon-x-y-sales

 

 

 

Nintendo announced Let's go sales - DynamiteCop "bbbbut its not the same game, it should be counted separately for sales because I expected it to flop"

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

1 minute ago, Goukosan said:

 

Nintendo announced omega red and blue Launch week sales. 

 

http://siliconera.com/2014/11/26/week-sales-pokemon-omega-ruby-alpha-sapphire/

 

 

 

 

Nintendo reports Pokémon X&Y launch week sales. 

 

https://www.polygon.com/2013/10/15/4840738/pokemon-x-y-sales

 

 

 

Nintendo announced Let's go sales - DynamiteCop "bbbbut its not the same game, it should be counted separately for sales because I expected it to flop"

Why would I care what Nintendo says? It's a physical reality that they're separate games that require a separate full price purchase with different content not available in the other game regardless of their breakdowns, as previously said this is inarguable. 

 

It's two games, end of discussion. 

[Goukosan 2,256]

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Why would I care what Nintendo says? It's a physical reality that they're separate games that require a separate full price purchase with different content not available in the other game regardless of their breakdowns, as previously said this is inarguable. 

 

It's two games, end of discussion. 

 

 

So Japan, Europe and US independent sales tracking firms are wrong.  Nintendo and the Pokemon Company are also wrong. 

 

But DynamiteCop is right 

[DynamiteCop 2,086]

1 minute ago, Goukosan said:

 

 

So Japan, Europe and US independent sales tracking firms are wrong.  Nintendo and the Pokemon Company are also wrong. 

 

But DynamiteCop is right 

Why would I care about the way Nintendo tabulates their sales? Them counting it as one or two products is irrelevant to reality, it's two products.