jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, Vini said: Because the idea of court stacking originated from him. It's still a stupid fuckin idea he realized it...........a little too late I like how Vini has volunteered to lose more arguments. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 What a surprise, piece of shit Scott Walker doesn't want to concede: Quote Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is not conceding defeat to Democrat Tony Evers. Unofficial results show Evers beat Walker by about 29,000 votes, or just over 1 percentage point, out of more than 2.6 million votes cast. State law only permits recounts for losing candidates who are within 1 percentage point. Walker campaign spokesman Brian Reisinger says "we need the official canvass and for military ballots to be counted before any decision can be made." Yes, there's 29,000 WIsconsin vets out there mailing in their ballots. Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, jehurey said: lololol nope. My post: And then your post responding to me: Welp, you lost that one, quickly. Yea keep dreaming It's called FDR's court stacking plan in the dictionary you're the one drawing an equivalence to his stupidity. Like it's not exponentially dumber to repeat bad ideas in history. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Vini said: Yea keep dreaming It's called FDR's court stacking plan in the dictionary you're the one drawing an equivalence to his stupidity. Like it's not exponentially dumber to repeat bad ideas in history. No......you originally tried to say it was stupid because it was unconstitutional. And then you were corrected...........which means Ocasio-Cortez knew something you didn't. How can you speak to her intelligence when you didn't even know what was possible to begin with WHEN you were commenting on her intelligence? Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 I keep dreaming? Of what? Are you saying that I brought up FDR in this conversation first? That's a Yes or No question. (What are the chances he avoids answering it) Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) 5 hours ago, Vini said: If Dems lose the house too tonight I'm hoping there will be some serious reflection on what they're doing pushing the country so far to the right. 5 hours ago, Hot Sauce said: If Republicans lose the house tonight I'm hoping there will be some serious reflection on what they're doing pushing the country so far to the left. Whoops @Vini Edited November 7, 2018 by Goukosan Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 "Who knows.....................all of these Democrats winning these house seats may CAUSE the voters across the nation to move to the right." -Vini Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) Let's some it up @jehurey ITT You misinterpreted an obvious intention in a tweet You failed to even understand what court stacking means You posted a link trying to prove the wrong definition of court stacking that actually proved the opposite You tried to claim that republicans are stacking the Supreme Court You tried to claim posting the original tweet after a retweet constitutes changing sources You tried to hinge your victory over things of no significance like posting a picture of a tweet instead of the video or who brought up FDR first and You were just literally defending a bad idea from a president simply because he got re-elected. Did I miss anything? Edited November 7, 2018 by Vini Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, Goukosan said: Whoops Vini Yea keep acting like that comparison made sense. Dems losing both = Republicans losing just the house. Yeah same amount of reflection needed. Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, Vini said: Yea keep acting like that comparison made sense. Dems losing both = Republicans losing just the house. Yeah same amount of reflection needed. You do know what republicans losing the house of representatives mean right? Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, Vini said: Let's some it up @jehurey ITT You misinterpreted an obvious intention in a tweet You failed to even understand what court stacking means You posted a link trying to prove the wrong definition of court stacking that actually proved the opposite You tried to claim that republicans are stacking the Supreme Court You tried to claim posting the original tweet after a retweet constitutes changing sources You tried to pivot your victory over things of no significance to the argument like posting a picture of a tweet instead of the video or who brought up FDR first and You were just literally defending a bad idea from a president simply because he got re-elected. Did I miss anything? No. You clearly wanted to talk about Ocasio-Cortez being "so fucking stupid" You were clearly trying to imply that she is so dumb that she doesn't understand basic fundamentals of American governance. You posted a tweet headline............and the main part you wanted to show was JUST THE HEADLINE...........and that headline purposely made a point to add the words "control by Congress" which insinuated that Ocasio-Cortez THOUGHT that they (Democrats) can appoint Supreme Court justices by just controlling Congress. Two different people on this forum, me and Teh_Diplo, both interpreted that in the same exact way, and we clearly TOLD YOU that it looked like a misleading headline and we TOLD YOU what about it seemed misleading. You never clarified yourself. After I said that the right-winger is probably taking her out of context.......you post a video, implying that he wasn't taking her out of context. The video clearly showed that he DID OMIT the rest of her sentence. Once again, two different posters pointed this out to you. And ONLY THEN.............after that, did you attempt to shift over to "nah, nah...........its packing the courts, in general, that makes her stupid." Which, of course, makes no logical sense to assess intelligence on something like that. And you've been avoiding explaining that obvious flaw in logic, ever since. Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, jehurey said: No. You clearly wanted to talk about Ocasio-Cortez being "so fucking stupid" You were clearly trying to imply that she is so dumb that she doesn't understand basic fundamentals of American governance. You posted a tweet headline............and the main part you wanted to show was JUST THE HEADLINE...........and that headline purposely made a point to add the words "control by Congress" which insinuated that Ocasio-Cortez THOUGHT that they (Democrats) can appoint Supreme Court justices by just controlling Congress. Two different people on this forum, me and Teh_Diplo, both interpreted that in the same exact way, and we clearly TOLD YOU that it looked like a misleading headline and we TOLD YOU what about it seemed misleading. You never clarified yourself. After I said that the right-winger is probably taking her out of context.......you post a video, implying that he wasn't taking her out of context. The video clearly showed that he DID OMIT the rest of her sentence. Once again, two different posters pointed this out to you. And ONLY THEN.............after that, did you attempt to shift over to "nah, nah...........its packing the courts, in general, that makes her stupid." Which, of course, makes no logical sense to assess intelligence on something like that. And you've been avoiding explaining that obvious flaw in logic, ever since. That was all nonsense. And I don't have to explain you and diplo's misinterpretation of someone else's tweet that I never myself articulated. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Its amazing how both me and Teh_Diplo both responded to you............and then you posted a video, and then both me and Teh_Diplo responded to you AGAIN...........STILL TALKING about Ocasio-Cortez clearly mentioning the proper procedure for passing Supreme Court justices through both Congress and the democrats having the Presidency. ................and at no point you never bothered to offer a clarification to two different people telling you the same thing. until AFTER we made fun of you and the video you posted. lol Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, Goukosan said: You do know what republicans losing the house of representatives mean right? President Mike Pence? Great job. Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, jehurey said: Its amazing how both me and Teh_Diplo both responded to you............and then you posted a video, and then both me and Teh_Diplo responded to you AGAIN...........STILL TALKING about Ocasio-Cortez clearly mentioning the proper procedure for passing Supreme Court justices through both Congress and the democrats having the Presidency. ................and at no point you never bothered to offer a clarification to two different people telling you the same thing. until AFTER we made fun of you and the video you posted. lol lmao two different idiots misread something and I have to clarify it even though I didn't even write it. I have no doubt there's two more idiots on this forum you can find who would also have misread that. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, Vini said: That was all nonsense. And I don't have to explain you and diplo's misinterpretation of someone else's tweet that I never myself articulated. Yes you do................you're the one posting it..............and the tweet consist of nothing but a headline. And the MOST NOTABLE thing about the headline is how someone could believe that they could pass through Supreme Court Justices ONLY having needed to control Congress. And the most logical association to your claim of her being "so.................fucking....................stupid" is to point out the most stupid insinuation in that tweet you posted. Which was..........[drumroll]..........the part about just needing Congress. Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 That's the most notable thing if you're mentally retarded sure To me the most notable thing was the thing in quotes "pack the Supreme Court". Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Vini said: lmao two different idiots misread something and I have to clarify it even though I didn't even write it. I have no doubt there's two more idiots on this forum you can find who would also have misread that. Except for the fact that our interpretation makes more sense than your (latter) explaination???????? Its amazing, Vini. You honesty cannot get out of this perfect checkmate I got you in. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, Vini said: That's the most notable thing if you're mentally retarded sure To me the most notable thing was the thing in quotes "pack the Supreme Court". No. Its the most logical interpretation. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...............Vini, if YOUR (latter) interpreation is MORE LOGICAL. Then explain it to me!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, jehurey said: Its amazing, Vini. You honesty cannot get out of this perfect checkmate I got you in. That's your delusion. The only checkmate here is the infinite reply loop I have you in. Cause you're going to give up the last word before me I promise you that. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts