jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Vini said: Maybe we should ask the communist gender studies chick from New York. I'm pretty sure she knows more about it than you. Ah........another attempt at a topic change. I am surely not keeping track of these. And they definitely do not demonstrate how you seem to be trying to get out of this through gimmicks. Link to post Share on other sites
Hot Sauce 2,734 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 17 minutes ago, Vini said: Congress already deemed unconstitutional 1. That's not what Congress does. 2. Because of 1, it wasn't deemed unconstitutional. It simply didn't have the support to pass. 3. Nothing in the constitution says anything about the number of supreme court judges, so there's no unconstitutional argument against it. 4. Federal law dictates the number of supreme court judges and Congress can change laws with enough votes. 5. I don't support packing the courts. Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, jehurey said: Ah........another attempt at a topic change. I am surely not keeping track of these. And they definitely do not demonstrate how you seem to be trying to get out of this through gimmicks. So let me get your argument straight I posted a tweet that took her out of context to prove that she was stupid, then I went out of my way to post the video of her IN context to contradict myself. Hmm I wonder if that's more likely than making fun of the second half of her sentence that was perfectly in context and much more retarded than the out of context first part. hmmmmm Edited November 7, 2018 by Vini Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Vini said: So let me get your argument straight I posted a tweet that took her out of context to prove that she was stupid, then I went out of my way to post the video of her IN context to contradict myself. Hmm I wonder if that's more likely than making fun of the second half of her sentence that was perfectly in context and much more retarded than the out of context first part. hmmmmm Yup. Because that would mean that you are trying to insinuate that packing a court is an act of immense stupidity. .........which makes no logical sense to describe it as such. You could argue its HIGHLY UNETHICAL. You could argue that its politically toxic. But your argument centers on Ocasio-Cortez intelligence........that she is "so stupid" like really, really stupid. And one can only interpret that you are saying that she doesn't understand the most fundamental of things. And we know exactly what you were trying to say that she "did not understand"...........you were trying to cling onto the "only take control of Congress" aspect of her comment. Notice how I don't have to change my argument...........because its solid from all around. You're on your.............6th, or 7th different attempt now???? Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, Hot Sauce said: 1. That's not what Congress does. 2. Because of 1, it wasn't deemed unconstitutional. It simply didn't have the support to pass. 3. Nothing in the constitution says anything about the number of supreme court judges, so there's no unconstitutional argument against it. 4. Federal law dictates the number of supreme court judges and Congress can change laws with enough votes. 5. I don't support packing the courts. You're right the new deal legislation itself was deemed unconstitutional not the court packing. I'm glad at least you know what court packing means Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, jehurey said: Yup. Because that would mean that you are trying to insinuate that packing a court is an act of immense stupidity. It is when it's coming from a do gooder socialist who doesn't know any better. Forgive me if I don't think she's some evil mastermind. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Yeah i didn't want to argue further on...........because Vini was trying to change the topic. But, what Hot Sauce pointed out also defeats Vini's retcon, as well You CAN theoretically add more supreme court justices. Its not clean-cut because there is no defined law either way. But we know for a fact that the Supreme Court has increased over time. It was never 9 judges to begin with. Thus Vini's calim of it being "so stupid" makes no sense in that context. IF that was his intended context (which it wasn't). Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Vini said: It is when it's coming from a do gooder socialist who doesn't know any better. Forgive me if I don't think she's some evil mastermind. But, according to Hot Sauce.............Ocasio Cortez having SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE to know that you can theoretically increase the number of justices to a Supreme Court completely DEFEATS your theory of her being stupid in the first place. Pick your poison. LOL Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, jehurey said: But, according to Hot Sauce.............Ocasio Cortez having SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE to know that you can theoretically increase the number of justices to a Supreme Court completely DEFEATS your theory of her being stupid in the first place. Pick your poison. LOL I have no doubt she knows what packing the court means (even though you didn't lol), I just don't think she can even begin to fathom how improbable and irresponsible something like that would be. Kinda like Socialism actually. Edited November 7, 2018 by Vini Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Vini said: I have no doubt she knows what packing the court means Wow.................more ret-conning. This is satisfying. He's now introducing a THIRD claim. She's not "so fucking stupid".............you were apparently saying she's "so fucking crazy." LOL. yeah right. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Brian Kemp is leading the Georgia Governor's race by 111k votes (2.9 percentage points)............in a state where he oversaw the removal of about 340k voters from the rolls because they claimed that their address didn't exactly match. Such bullshit. Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, jehurey said: Wow.................more ret-conning. This is satisfying. He's now introducing a THIRD claim. She's not "so fucking stupid".............you were apparently saying she's "so fucking crazy." LOL. yeah right. Nope. She's stupid. That's my claim. Not because she thinks Congress can pack courts, not because she doesn't know what packing courts means. It's because she thinks packing the courts is a viable solution. That's what I said from the start. Your hoop jumping rhetoric aside. Edited November 7, 2018 by Vini Link to post Share on other sites
Teh_Diplomat 2,054 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 lol, so both Chris Collins AND Duncan Hunter were re-elected? Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) And by the way @jehurey the original tweet came from Fox and Friends. And if you watch the video you'll see exactly what they meant. And you won't like it Nothing to do with her saying "Congress" alone. Edited November 7, 2018 by Vini Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Vini said: Nope. She's stupid. That's my claim. Not because she thinks Congress can pack courts, not because she doesn't know what packing courts means. It's because she thinks packing the courts is a viable solution. That's what I said from the start. Your hoop jumping rhetoric aside. I have you jumping trying to cover every single thing that I keep exposing. lol And you're trying to say that I'm "hoop jumping" None of this is working for you. Not a single thing. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, Vini said: And by the way @jehurey the original tweet came from Fox and Friends. And if you watch the video you'll see exactly what they meant. And you won't like it he just tried to go back and change his source Oh my god, as if he couldn't look any more guiltier. Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, jehurey said: he just tried to go back and change his source Oh my god, as if he couldn't look any more guiltier. My source was googling "ocasio pack supreme court" and posted the first tweet that came up You're just a dishonest twat literally grasping at any straw. Edited November 7, 2018 by Vini Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, Vini said: My source was googling "ocasio pack supreme court" and posted the first tweet that came up You're just a dishonest that literally grasping at any straw. It's sad right.................because in that fox and friend clip............they tried to promote the idea of her being "so fucking stupid" Oh wait, they didn't. Which means it doesn't line up with your first post. You literally cannot ret-con your original claim to save your life, I can poke the exposed flaws all day long. Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, jehurey said: right.................because in that fox and friend clip............they tried to promote the idea of her being "so fucking stupid" Oh wait, they didn't. Which means it doesn't line up with your first post. You literally cannot ret-con your original claim to save your life, I can poke the exposed flaws all day long. You're not poking shit faggot the only thing you expose on this forum is your own bad faith. Over and over again. Fuckin sociopath acting like a champion of the downtrodden I see right through you. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,231 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Vini said: You're not poking shit faggot the only thing you expose on this forum is your own bad faith. Over and over again. Fuckin sociopath acting like a champion of the downtrodden I see right through you. Of course I am......because I wasn't I would have you attempting to change your story multiple times, and even getting you to go back and try and change your source. Notice how one of us keeps their argument simple and consistent. And the other one doesn't. Notice how one of us is getting mad every 30 minutes, and the other one isn't. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts