U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies of pancreatic cancer at age 87

[54212 432]

1 hour ago, Liquid said:

This was kind of unnecessary. Everyone is well aware how awesomely 3rd world edgy you try to be. 

 

Comical. The Left celebrated when Scalia died. 

[Goukosan 2,255]

2 hours ago, Teh_Diplomat said:

Well, this took a weird turn.

what did I miss? 

[54212 432]

That was slightly predictable.

 

 

Stole two seats. 😂 Hey Harry, are you still happy you killed the Senate's legislative filibuster and started this whole thing?

 

 

[54212 432]

Edit: I misread. I think. 👺

 

 

Edited September 19, 2020 by Saucer

[Teh_Diplomat 2,054]

1 hour ago, Goukosan said:

what did I miss? 

DC posted a gif of a guy gettin' lotion and sittin' down in front of his PC; along with a video from a musical with Whoopi Goldberg as a nun.

[Teh_Diplomat 2,054]

 

[54212 432]

 

We don't negotiate with terrorists, Cannibal Aslan. 

[jehurey 3,230]

1 minute ago, Saucer said:

 

We don't negotiate with terrorists, Cannibal Aslan. 

We sure don't

 

If McConnell pulls the trigger, the Democratic controlled Senate has been given permission to throw ALL Senate out the window and go full thermonuclear.

 

Minimum 51 majority needed for every type of vote, including Supreme Court nominations. No filibuster. And Biden should go ahead and declare to expand the Supreme Court to 13 justices, adding 2 per year for the next two years.

 

Go ahead McConnell. Pull the trigger.

[jehurey 3,230]

28 minutes ago, Saucer said:

 

Comical. The Left celebrated when Scalia died. 

Really?

 

Post some proof of that.

 

Surely there's gotta be tons of Daily Show and Colbert Report footage where they actively celebrate him dying.

 

I'll wait.

[jehurey 3,230]

Lisa Murkowski, just hours before the news broke, had already said that she wouldn't vote on a Supreme Court Justice until after the election.

 

 

Quote

 

Sen. Lisa Murkowski said she wouldn't vote to confirm a Supreme Court Justice until after the election

9:51 p.m.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) says she won't vote on a Supreme Court nomination until after the election. Or at least that's what she said in an interview with Alaska Public Media only hours before the news of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's passing was reported late Friday.

 

"I would not vote to confirm a Supreme Court nominee. We are 50 some days away from an election," she reportedly said, referencing the 2016 case of Merrick Garland, when Republicans in the Senate, led by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.), blocked President Obama's nomination to replace Justice Antonin Scalia after he died that February. "That was too close to an election, and the people needed to decide."

 

 

So Murkowski is a No. Previous statements from Grassley suggest that he is a No.

 

Mitt Romney has pretty much said that he considered the Trump Presidency to be illegitmate, and he appears to be the strongest institutionalist among Republican Senators, he's more than likely to be a No.

 

And Susan Collins is polling 12 points behind her Democratic opponent, she's getting trashed for her vote on Kavanaugh. Her giving the wrong answer on this issue could be the difference between winning or losing her re-election.

 

Democrats absolutely should be threatening Mitch McConnell on him pulling the trigger. Because the threat isn't meant to fall entirely on McConnell, but other Senators who are thinking about their futures.

 

 

Edited September 19, 2020 by jehurey

[54212 432]

9 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Really?

 

It takes one minute to Google. Stop being lazy. Have you even cleaned your room yet? Post pics or I'm blocking you again. Your poor mum shouldn't have to put up with a giant loser like you.

 

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kristine-marsh/2016/02/15/twelve-tweets-liberal-journalists-celebrating-scalias-death

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/red-alert-politics/liberals-celebrate-scalias-death-twitter

 

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-02-16/antonin-scalias-death-unleashes-a-twitter-hate-storm-against-the-late-justice

[Vini 430]

22 minutes ago, Saucer said:

 

We don't negotiate with terrorists, Cannibal Aslan. 

 

What does that even mean? This guy's a tool and always has been

 

Edited September 19, 2020 by Vini

[54212 432]

But can they get past the filibuster? If so I'm thinking you have to replace RPG with Cruz instead of Barrett just to infuriate the Commies even more. Half their cities will be cinders by election day. 😂

 

 

[jehurey 3,230]

8 minutes ago, Saucer said:

 

It takes one minute to Google. Stop being lazy. Have you even cleaned your room yet? Post pics or I'm blocking you again. Your poor mum shouldn't have to put up with a giant loser like you.

 

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kristine-marsh/2016/02/15/twelve-tweets-liberal-journalists-celebrating-scalias-death

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/red-alert-politics/liberals-celebrate-scalias-death-twitter

 

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-02-16/antonin-scalias-death-unleashes-a-twitter-hate-storm-against-the-late-justice

So absolute no-name journalists who have twitter followings of:

 

426 people

 

726 people

 

1,356 people

 

1,067 people

 

996 people And those numbers are actually from today, and not 4 years ago.

 

And Glenn Greenwald, who isn't an actual liberal journalist.

 

That list is fantastic.........they even tried to pad the list by including a Sex Columnist.

 

This is terrific................you don't have any real major liberal voices. Thank you for this confirmation.

[Ike★ 2,908]

Wait you really trying to pull precedent when McConnell stole the fucking Garland seat saying it was an election year? 
 

Please, kindly fuck off. 

[54212 432]

Leftist terrorists are already trying to intimidate Cocaine Mitch at his house again. 

 

[54212 432]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

So absolute no-name journalists who have twitter followings of

 

That's not a picture of your bedroom cleaned up. Blocked. 

[jehurey 3,230]

4 minutes ago, Saucer said:

But can they get past the filibuster? If so I'm thinking you have to replace RPG with Cruz instead of Barrett just to infuriate the Commies even more. Half their cities will be cinders by election day. 😂

 

 

No that's fine.

 

The official Democratic platform will be eliminating the filibuster and expanding the Supreme Court.

 

C'mon, Mitch. Pull the trigger.

 

The great thing about eliminating the filibuster is that it means that the Democratic controlled Senate will easily be able to REMOVE federal judges and replace them.

 

They'll be very busy. Woo boy, the right-wing neighborhoods will start needing more blood thinner medications.

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, Saucer said:

 

That's not a picture of your bedroom cleaned up. Blocked. 

Thanks for proving that you couldn't find proof.

[54212 432]

2 minutes ago, Ike said:

Wait you really trying to pull precedent when McConnell stole the fucking Garland seat saying it was an election year? 
 

Please, kindly fuck off. 

 

By that logic the Dems are now trying to steal the RBG seat. And worse because the Republicans control both the White House and Senate unlike the Dems in 2015 who didn't control either the Senate or even the House.

 

Thieves by your own standards.