Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, nitric said: You know the story is fucked when your credible sources are nyp and Fox News. Next thing you know you’ll post something from daily mail. @-GD-X lock this fake news thread up See that's the endless loop we are in. The left wing media won't report negative things on their guy and the right wing won't post negative things on their guy. It's so this side and that side that the truth goes unreported or gets distorted. Twitter execs now has to go before the Senate and explain themselves. The FBI has Hunter Biden's laptop now. There's something there. Edited October 16, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said: Yeah I read it. So unnamed sources are no longer allowed on Twitter? So all that Russia stuff should never have been allowed.? Is this what you are saying gouk? You're comparing vetted sources who provide actual vetted proof to this story that has no vetted sources with zero vetted proof? ..... lmfao...how dumb can you be? If you actually read the article you would see that NO WHERE IN THERE it talks about anything or anyone being vetted and is all speculation. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 Just now, Goukosan said: You're comparing vetted sources who provide actual vetted proof to this story that has no vetted sources with zero vetted proof? ..... lmfao...how dumb can you be? If you actually read the article you would see that NO WHERE IN THERE it talks about anything or anyone being vetted and is all speculation. Vetted by whom? Why was the pee tape conspiracy allowed? Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: See that's the endless loop we are in. The left wing media won't report negative things on their guy and the right wing won't post negative things on their guy. It's so this side and that side that the truth goes unreported or gets distorted. Twitter execs now has to go before the Senate and explain themselves. The FBI has Hunter Biden's laptop now. There's something there. What's your source for this? That have Hunter Biden's Laptop? That link you posted doesn't say they have his laptop. From the link - "House Republicans are calling on the FBI to reveal whether it was in possession of a laptop that reportedly contained emails by Hunter Biden" “If the FBI was, in fact, in possession of this evidence..." Cooke reads that and says" OMG they have the laptop " I swear you cannot read and comprehend Edited October 16, 2020 by Goukosan Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: Vetted by whom? Why was the pee tape conspiracy allowed? You mean like the Pizza Gate? Or Obama Gate? You mean stories like that? After all the. misinformation that flooded teh election 4 years ago. The social media sites started fact checking stories about maybe 2 years ago to avoid the same thing from happening this election. any fact checked story gets flagged on FB now...doesn't matter which side it came from. Edited October 16, 2020 by Goukosan Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 48 minutes ago, Goukosan said: You mean like the Pizza Gate? Or Obama Gate? You mean stories like that? After all the. misinformation that flooded teh election 4 years ago. The social media sites started fact checking stories about maybe 2 years ago to avoid the same thing from happening this election. any fact checked story gets flagged on FB now...doesn't matter which side it came from. Simple test for you Gouk. If this story were about Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr would you spend half a second trying to tear it down? Edited October 16, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 37 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: Simple test for you Gouk. If this story were about Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr would you spend half a second trying to tear it down? What part about the fact checked fake stories get flagged don't you get? Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 409 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Goukosan said: Tell that to yourself. I swear you have the memory of a single cell organism. You're talking to the same guy who posted the Biden talking on stage clip that was debunked last year as if he just dug up some hot content. Cooke's problem is half of the shit he post he doesn't even understand. He just sees some alt right people get upset about something then he decides he's upset about it too. Link to post Share on other sites
lostfool 680 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) Do you know what a Tabloid is? Tabloids run hard hitting stories Hillary clinton raised a lizard baby and shit like that. Funny how this is almost the same story that popped up right before the election in 2016. A laptop abandoned at a repair shop with supposedly incriminating emails to someone close to the Clintons that involved the Clintons. God Cooke you are stupid. Edited October 16, 2020 by lostfool Link to post Share on other sites
lostfool 680 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 17 minutes ago, Goukosan said: What part about the fact checked fake stories get flagged don't you get? I think Cooke gets the NY Times (real journalism) confused with the NY Post a tabloid magazine. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Goukosan said: What part about the fact checked fake stories get flagged don't you get? How has twitter proved it fake? They didn't. They simply said you can't use unnamed sources. Yet that shit has gone on for years for anti trump stuff. a vetted source. lmao, by who? Who does the vetting? What makes the vetting reliable? Its just a bunch of bullshit. If you cannot admit the news media and tech media are biased to the left you're fucking insane. Edited October 16, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 11 minutes ago, lostfool said: I think Cooke gets the NY Times (real journalism) confused with the NY Post a tabloid magazine. Both post garbo tabloid awfulness. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 27 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said: You're talking to the same guy who posted the Biden talking on stage clip that was debunked last year as if he just dug up some hot content. Cooke's problem is half of the shit he post he doesn't even understand. He just sees some alt right people get upset about something then he decides he's upset about it too. explain alt right to us. You seem to blanket use the word like people use racist and nazi. Link to post Share on other sites
lostfool 680 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: Do you think twitter spends even a fraction of the time fact checking negative stories on Trump as they do on Biden? Honestly? How much time do they need on a rag mag that has headlines like this? Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 5 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: How has twitter proved it fake? They didn't. They simply said you can't use unnamed sources. Yet that shit has gone on for years for anti trump stuff. a vetted source. lmao, by who? Who does the vetting? What makes the vetting reliable? Its just a bunch of bullshit. If you cannot admit the news media and tech media are biased to the left you're fucking insane. 1 hour ago, Goukosan said: You mean like the Pizza Gate? Or Obama Gate? You mean stories like that? After all the. misinformation that flooded teh election 4 years ago. The social media sites started fact checking stories about maybe 2 years ago to avoid the same thing from happening this election. any fact checked story gets flagged on FB now...doesn't matter which side it came from. its like talking in circles with you. I said vetted source and vetted proof. Your story has neither a vetted source or vetted proof. You are legit brain dead. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, lostfool said: How much time do they need on a rag mag that has headlines like this? lol thats actually pretty funny. And also true, the justices are supposed to not have public opinions on sitting presidents. Edited October 16, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, Goukosan said: its like talking in circles with you. I said vetted source and vetted proof. Your story has neither a vetted source or vetted proof. You are legit brain dead. WHO DOES THE VETTING? what does vetting mean to you? Someone biased can do the vetting and then its unreliable. what makes the vetting reliable and who gets to decide that it is??? Edited October 16, 2020 by Cooke (not admin cant help Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said: lol thats actually pretty funny what's funny is you reading that story in your link and coming to the conclusion that the FBI has Hunter laptop. From the link - "House Republicans are calling on the FBI to reveal whether it was in possession of a laptop that reportedly contained emails by Hunter Biden" “If the FBI was, in fact, in possession of this evidence..." Cooke reads that and says" OMG they have the laptop " Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,029 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 1 minute ago, Goukosan said: what's funny is you reading that story in your link and coming to the conclusion that the FBI has Hunter laptop. From the link - "House Republicans are calling on the FBI to reveal whether it was in possession of a laptop that reportedly contained emails by Hunter Biden" “If the FBI was, in fact, in possession of this evidence..." Cooke reads that and says" OMG they have the laptop " And if they do? Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,255 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 1 minute ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: WHO DOES THE VETTING? what does vetting mean to you? Someone biased can do the vetting and then its unreliable. what makes the vetting reliable and who gets to decide that it is??? It's like you don't know what a vetted source and vetted proof means.....that's quite obvious because your story has neither any proof or a vetted source They story said "if" and cooke said confirmed Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts